Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A nationwide database analysis of demographics and outcomes related to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to understand the use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and its outcomes.

Methods

The 2016 Kid’s Inpatient Database (KID) obtained from the national Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) was used to obtain CDH birth, demographic, and outcome data associated with ECMO use. Categorical variables were analyzed and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported for variables found to have significance (p < 0.05). Appropriate regressions were used for comparing categorical and continuous data using SPSS 25 for Macintosh.

Results

The database contained 1189 cases of CDH, of which 133 (11.2%) received ECMO. The overall mortality of neonates with CDH was 18.9% (225/1189). Newborns with CDH on ECMO had a survival of 46% (61/133) compared to 85.5% without ECMO (903/1056) (OR 6.966, p < 0.001, 95% CI 4.756–10.204). ECMO increased length of stay from 24.6 to 69.8 days (OR 2.834, p < 0.001, 95% CI 2.768–2.903) and average cost from $375,002.20 to $1641,586.83 (OR 4.378, p < 0.001, 95% CI 3.341–5.735).

Conclusions

Increased length of stay, costs, and outcomes with ECMO use in CDH should prompt an examination of criteria necessitating ECMO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CDH:

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia

ECMO:

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

HCUP:

Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project

KID:

Kid’s Inpatient Database

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Kosinski P, Wielgos M (2017) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: pathogenesis, prenatal diagnosis and management—literature review. Ginekol Pol 88:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ameis D, Khoshgoo N, Keijzer R (2017) Abnormal lung development in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg 26:123–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dingeldein M (2018) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: management and outcomes. Adv Pediatr 65:241–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leeuwen L, Fitzgerald DA (2014) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Paediatr Child Health 50:667–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Danzer E, Hoffman C, D’Agostino JA et al (2018) Short-term neurodevelopmental outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and timing of repair. Pediatr Crit Care Med 19:64–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vieira R, Pearse R, Rankin J (2018) Mortality factors in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review. Birth Defects Res 110:1241–1249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hinton CF, Siffel C, Correa A et al (2017) Survival disparities associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Birth Defects Res 109:816–823

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jenks CL, Raman L, Dalton HJ (2017) Pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Clin 33:825–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin JC (2017) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe pediatric respiratory failure. Respir Care 62:732–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grover TR, Rintoul NE, Hedrick HL (2018) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Perinatol 42:96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thiagarajan RR (2016) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac indications in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 17:S155-159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morini F, Valfre L, Bagolan P (2017) Long-term morbidity of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a plea for standardization. Semin Pediatr Surg 26:301–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. (HCUP) (2016) HCaUP, HCUP Kid’s Inpatient Database (KID). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville

  14. World Health Organization (2016) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th revision. https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en

  15. World Health Organization (2016) ICD-10 procedure coding system 2016 Tables and Index

  16. Song AY, Chen HA, Chapman R et al (2017) Utilization patterns of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates in the United States 1997–2012. J Pediatr Surg 52:1681–1687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barbaro RP, Paden ML, Guner YS et al (2017) Pediatric extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J 63:456–463

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McHoney M, Hammond P (2018) Role of ECMO in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 103:F178–F181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abdulhai S, Glenn IC, McNinch NL et al (2018) Current practices in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: results of an international survey of pediatric surgeons. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28:606–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cairo SB, Arbuthnot M, Boomer LA et al (2018) Controversies in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair using a Delphi approach: from the American Pediatric Surgical Association Critical Care Committee (APSA-CCC). Pediatr Surg Int 34:1163–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Danzer E, Hedrick HL (2014) Controversies in the management of severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 19:376–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katz AL, Wiswell TE, Baumgart S (1998) Contemporary controversies in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Clin Perinatol 25:219–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bryner BS, Kim AC, Khouri JS et al (2009) Right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia: high utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and high survival. J Pediatr Surg 44:883–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Snoek KG, Greenough A, van Rosmalen J et al (2018) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: 10-year evaluation of survival, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and foetoscopic endotracheal occlusion in four high-volume centres. Neonatology 113:63–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sola JE, Bronson SN, Cheung MC et al (2010) Survival disparities in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a national perspective. J Pediatr Surg 45:1336–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oyetunji TA, Thomas A, Moon TD et al (2013) The impact of ethnic population dynamics on neonatal ECMO outcomes: a single urban institutional study. J Surg Res 181:199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Daodu O, Brindle ME (2017) Predicting outcomes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg 26:136–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jancelewicz T, Brindle ME, Harting MT et al (2018) Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) risk stratification in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). J Pediatr Surg 53:1890–1895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vaja R, Bakr A, Sharkey A et al (2017) The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a 26-year experience from a tertiary centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 52:552–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cauley RP, Stoffan A, Potanos K et al (2013) Pulmonary support on day 30 as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 48:1183–1189

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Guner YS, Nguyen DV, Zhang L et al (2018) Development and validation of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation mortality-risk models for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. ASAIO J 64:785–794

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Murthy K, Pallotto EK, Gien J et al (2016) Predicting death or extended length of stay in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Perinatol 36:654–659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Seetharamaiah R, Younger JG, Bartlett RH et al (2009) Factors associated with survival in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a report from the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group. J Pediatr Surg 44:1315–1321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dalton HJ, Reeder R, Garcia-Filion P et al (2017) Factors associated with bleeding and thrombosis in children receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 196:762–771

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Millar JE, Fanning JP, McDonald CI et al (2016) The inflammatory response to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a review of the pathophysiology. Crit Care 20:387

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Turek JW, Nellis JR, Sherwood BG et al (2017) Shifting risks and conflicting outcomes-ECMO for neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the modern era. J Pediatr 190:163–168 (e164)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barton R, Ignjatovic V, Monagle P (2019) Anticoagulation during ECMO in neonatal and paediatric patients. Thromb Res 173:172–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Delaplain PT, Zhang L, Chen Y et al (2017) Cannulating the contraindicated: effect of low birth weight on mortality in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr Surg 52:2018–2025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kays DW, Islam S, Richards DS et al (2014) Extracorporeal life support in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: how long should we treat? J Am Coll Surg 218:808–817

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study, G (2001) Estimating disease severity of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the first 5 minutes of life. J Pediatr Surg 36:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cuevas Guaman M, Akinkuotu AC, Cruz SM et al (2018) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in premature infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. ASAIO J 64:e126–e129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. McMullan DM, Thiagarajan RR, Smith KM et al (2014) Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in term and premature neonates*. Pediatr Crit Care Med 15:e9–e16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. McEvoy CS, Ross-Li D, Held JM et al (2019) Geographic distance to pediatric surgical care within the continental United States. J Pediatr Surg 54:1112–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Storme L, Boubnova J, Mur S et al (2018) Review shows that implementing a nationwide protocol for congenital diaphragmatic hernia was a key factor in reducing mortality and morbidity. Acta Paediatr 107:1131–1139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang Y, Honeyford K, Aylin P et al (2019) One-year outcomes for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. BJS Open 3:305–313

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Harvey MJ, Gaies MG, Prosser LA (2015) U.S. and international in-hospital costs of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 13:341–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Raval MV, Wang X, Reynolds M et al (2011) Costs of congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair in the United States-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation foots the bill. J Pediatr Surg 46:617–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sathyaprasad Burjonrappa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

The following lists the categorical variables that were grouped differently than the HCUP groupings. Groups were only combined. Grouping was changed only when criteria for Pearson’s Chi-squared test was not met due to a cell size < 5.

A.1.1 Primary expected payer

The HCUP categorization of this variable an indicator of expected primary payer:

  1. (1)

    Medicare,

  2. (2)

    Medicaid,

  3. (3)

    Private including HMO,

  4. (4)

    Self-pay,

  5. (5)

    No charge,

  6. (6)

    Other.

This variable was regrouped as:

  1. (1)

    Medicare, Medicaid, or no charge or

  2. (2)

    Private, HMO, Self-pay, other.

A.1.2 Race

The HCUP categorization of this variable an indicator of race:

  1. (1)

    White,

  2. (2)

    Black,

  3. (3)

    Hispanic,

  4. (4)

    Asian or Pacific Islander,

  5. (5)

    Native American,

  6. (6)

    Other.

This variable was regrouped as:

  1. (1)

    White

  2. (2)

    Black

  3. (3)

    Hispanic

  4. (4)

    Other.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snyder, A.N., Cheng, T. & Burjonrappa, S. A nationwide database analysis of demographics and outcomes related to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Surg Int 37, 1505–1513 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04979-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04979-y

Keywords

Navigation