Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does percutaneous internal ring suturing contain risk of ilioinguinal nerve entrapment?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, we aim to assess the alteration of IIN functions in children with inguinal hernias operated on using open or ‘percutaneous internal ring suturing’ (PIRS).

Methods

This study was based on a prospective clinical trial of 60 pediatric patients. They were operated on using PIRS or conventional open hernia repair technique. Group 1 included 35 patients who were treated with PIRS technique. Group 2 included 22 patients who underwent a conventional open hernia repair. The ilioinguinal nerve stimuli in both the operational and non-operational areas were evaluated in patients with peripheral EMG for possible ilioinguinal nerve damage on the hernia side before the operation and to reevaluate ilioinguinal nerve function in the third postoperative week.

Result

In Group 1, 19 cases underwent a preoperative EMG examination and in 35 cases, EMG examination was obtained postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative EMG results were normal in all cases in Group 1 on both the operational and non-operational sides. In Group 2, 15 preoperative and 25 postoperative EMG examinations were obtained. In Group 2, only one case with a right inguinal hernia who had normal preoperative EMG results showed no IIN response in a postoperative EMG evaluation obtained in the third postoperative week, with a normal left-side response. The EMG was repeated at the three-month postoperative third mark and revealed the same result. In a six-year-old female case, there was a negative EMG response on the non-operative side both pre- and postoperatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liem MS et al (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mc Cormack K et al (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:1785

    Google Scholar 

  3. Patkowski D, Czernik J, Chrzan R, Jaworski W, Apoznański W (2006) Percutaneous internal ring suturing: a simple minimally invasive technique for inguinal hernia repair in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 16(5):513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klaassen Z, Marshall E, Tubbs RS, Louis RG Jr, Wartmann CT, Loukas M (2011) Anatomy of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves with observations of their spinal nerve contributions. Clin Anat 24(4):454–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meulen BC, Peters EW, Wijsmuller A, Kropman RF, Mosch A, Tavy DL (2007) Acute scrotal pain from idiopathic ilioinguinal neuropathy: diagnosis and treatment with EMG-guided nerve block. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109(6):535–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schier F (1998) Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in girls. J Pediatr Surg 33:1495–1497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chowbey PK, Pithawala M, Khullar R, Sharma A, Soni V, Baijal M (2006) Complications in groin hernia surgery and the way out. J MAS 2:174–177

    Google Scholar 

  8. Esposito C, Montinaro L, Aliccho F, Scermino S, Basile A, Armenise T, Settimi A (2009) Technical standardization of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in pediatric patients. World J Surg 33:1846–1850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ein SH, Njere I, Ein A (2006) Six thousand three hundred sixty-one pediatric inguinal hernia: a 35-year review. J Pediatr Surg 41:980–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takehara Hiroo, Yakabe Shigeru, Kameoka Kazuhiro (2006) Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia in children: clinical outcome of 972 repairs done in 3 pediatric surgical institutions. J Pediatr Surg 41:1999–2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tam YH, Lee KH, Sihoe JD, Chan KW, Wong PY, Cheung ST, Mou JW (2009) Laparoscopichernia repair in children by the hook method: a single-center series of 433 consecutive patients. J Pediatr Surg 44(8):1502–1505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dutta S, Albanese C (2009) Transcutaneous laparoscopic hernia repair in children: a prospective review of 275 hernia repairs with minimum 2-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 23(1):103–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kastenberg Z, Bruzoni M, Dutta S (2011) A modification of the laparoscopic transcutaneous inguinal hernia repair to achieve transfixation ligature of the hernia sac. J Pediatr Surg 46(8):1658–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uchida H, Kawashima H, Goto C, Sato K, Yoshida M, Takazawa S, Iwanaka T (2010) Inguinal hernia repair in children using single-incision laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous extraperitoneal closure. J Pediatr Surg 45(12):2386–2389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spurbeck WW, Prasad R, Lobe TE (2005) Two-year experience with minimally invasive herniorrhaphy in children. Surg Endosc 19:551–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schier F (2006) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair—a prospective personal series of 542 children. J Pediatr Surg 41:1081–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Treef Walid, Schier Felix (2009) Characteristics of laparoscopic inguinal hernia recurrences. Pediatr Serg Int 25:149–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Endo M, Ukiyama E (2001) Laparoscopic closure of patent processus vaginalis in girl with inguinal hernia using specially devised suture needle. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech 5:187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong JY, Kim WO, Koo BN, Kim YA, Jo YY, Kil HK (2010) The relative position of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves in different age groups of pediatric patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 54(5):566–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bademkıran F, Tataroglu C, Özdedeli K, Altay B, Aydogdu İ, Uludağ B, Ertekin C (2005) Electrophysiological evaluation of the genitofemoral nerve in patients with inguinal hernia. Muscle Nerve 32:600–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Soyer T, Tosun A, Aydın G, Kaya M, Arslan A, Orkun S, Çakmak M (2008) Evaluation of genitofemoral nerve motor conduction in inguinoscrotal pathologies. J Pediatr Surg 43:1540–1542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Disma N, Tuo P, Pellegrino S, Astuto M (2009) Three concentrations of levobupivacaine for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block in ambulatory pediatric surgery. J Clin Anesth 21(6):389–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Holzheimer RG, Gresser U (2007) Inguinal hernia vs. arthritis of the hip in sporting adolescents—case report and review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 12(7):314–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Dabbagh AK (2002) Anatomical variations of the inguinal nerves and risks of injury in 110 hernia repairs. Surg Radiol Anat 24:102–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdullah Yıldız.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kara, Ö., Yıldız, A., Toydemir, H.E. et al. Does percutaneous internal ring suturing contain risk of ilioinguinal nerve entrapment?. Pediatr Surg Int 31, 485–491 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3689-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3689-9

Keywords

Navigation