Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term follow-up of paediatric anorectal anomalies and the role and efficacy of parent support groups for such conditions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/Purpose

There are a multitude of parent support groups for most life situations and medical conditions. The aim of this study was to discover defining characteristics and to evaluate the structure and effectiveness of parent support groups in paediatric anorectal anomalies.

Methods

Over 200 non-profit organisations and parent support groups were sent questionnaires to determine their effectiveness. Many of these were excluded as they were deemed not relevant to the final study. A final 20 groups were included for review, questions were based around origins, activities, education and evaluation, organisational structure and their affiliations with the health care team.

Results

Most groups had similar origins, usually an educated parent who had a child born with the condition and a zest for further knowledge and understanding and a desire to share this with others in a similar situation. Only 20 % received government funding; few had paid staff and half had good relations with the local medical and paramedical fraternity. The majority had a team of long-term enthusiastic volunteers who remained with the group to support others long after their own child was no longer a concern.

Conclusions

Some support groups offer a valuable service to families alongside the medical and paramedical fraternity. These groups provide families with the day-to-day lived experiences through social media, networking and meetings. Some provide more formal educational conferences designed to bring families, the medical and paramedical fraternity together to learn valuable lessons from each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McDonald P (1992) Extended family in Australia: the family beyond the household. Fam Matters 32:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gaudron M (2008) The Gift of Hope, a special report published in the Sydney Morning Herald

  3. Rathbone RW (1994) A very present help: caring for Australians since 1813: the history of the Benevolent Society of New South Wales. State Library of New South Wales Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ritchie J, Stewart M et al (2000) Parents’ perceptions of the impact of a telephone support group intervention. J Fam Nurs 6(1):25–45 (Educ. 2005: 31:825–8, 825–2, 834, 836)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC et al (2009) Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients’ empowerment. Patient Educ Couns 74(1):61–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hillan J (2003) PatchWorx: connecting unhealthy and disabled children in an online community. Clin Med Res 1(3):259–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Online document: Deductible Tax Recipient. http://www.ato.gov.au/nonprofit/pathway.aspx?pc=001/004/006. Accessed 16 May 2013

  8. Law M, King S et al (2001) The perceived effects of parent-led support groups for parents of children with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 21(2/3):29–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dadich A (2008) What can self-help support groups offer clinicians? Australas Med J 1(2):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyle FM, Posner TN, Del Mar CB, McLean J, Bush RA (2003) Self-help organisations: a qualitative study of successful collaboration with general practice. Aust J Prim Health 9:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson D, Faga P et al (2004) Raising families: urban women’s experiences of requiring support. Contemp Nurse J Aust Nurs Prof 18(1–2):97–107

    Google Scholar 

  12. O’Connor JB, Johanson JF (2000) Use of the web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population. JAMA 284(15):1962–1964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nolbris M, Abrahamsson J, Hellstrom A-L, Olofsson L, Enskar K (2010) The experience of therapeutic support groups by siblings of children with cancer. Pediatr Nurs 36(6):298–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zrebiec JF (2005) Internet communities: do they improve coping with diabetes? Diabetes Educ 31:825–828 (825–832, 834, 836)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cassano J, Nagel K et al (2008) Talking with others who “just know”: perceptions of adolescents with cancer who participate in a teen group. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 25(4):193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yardley IA, Pauniaho S-L, Baillie CT, Turnock RR, Coldicutt P, Lamont GL, Kenny SE (2009) After the honeymoon comes divorce: long-term use of the antegrade continence enema procedure. J Pediatr Surg 44:1274–1277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McDonnell GV, McCann JP (2000) Why do adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus die? A clinic-based study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 10(Suppl 1):31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Riessman F (1965) The “Helper” therapy principle. Soc Work 10:27–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the organisations involved in this research for their insight into the services they provide.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Croaker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gribbin, E., Croaker, D. Long-term follow-up of paediatric anorectal anomalies and the role and efficacy of parent support groups for such conditions. Pediatr Surg Int 29, 931–936 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3360-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3360-2

Keywords

Navigation