Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of sacral magnetic stimulation on the anorectal manometric activity: a new modality for examining sacro-rectoanal interaction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the interaction between the sacral neural system and the anorectal activity using a technique comprising repetitive magnetic stimulation. Thirteen control children without any bowel dysmotility (age range; 3 month old to 15 year old), 20 patients with chronic constipation (1 month old to 14 year old), and nine pre-operative patients with Hirschsprung’s disease (1 month old to 6 year old) were examined. Magnetic stimulation was applied at the S3 level using the MagPro (Medtronic) device while simultaneously performing manometric recordings of the anorectal activity. In the 13 controls and the 20 patients with chronic constipation, the rectoanal reflex was demonstrated by balloon rectal dilatation. The sphincter response to magnetic stimulation was biphasic in the controls, consisting of an initial rise followed by a decrease in the sphincter pressure, while it varied among the patients with chronic constipation including a biphasic response in 16 patients, no response in three patients, and only a transient rise in pressure in one patient. In nine pre-operative patients with Hirschsprung’s disease, no rectoanal reflex was observed, however, the sphincter pressure increased due to magnetic stimulation in six patients, while three patients exhibited no recordable responses. These results suggest that the repetitive magnetic stimulation technique is a valuable modality for investigating the neural interaction between the sacral nervous system and the anorectum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marte A, Cotrufo AM, Di Iorio G et al (2001) Electromyographic and manometric anorectal evaluation in children affected by neuropathic bladder secondary to myelomeningocele. Minerva Pediatr 53:171–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morera C, Nurko S (2003) Rectal manometry in patients with isolated sacral agenesis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 37:47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tjandra JJ, Ooi BS, Han WR (2000) Anorectal physiologic testing for bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord lesions. Dos Colon Rectum 43:927–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Correa GI, Rotter KP (2000) Clinical evaluation and management of neurogenic bowel after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 38:301–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujishiro T, Takahashi S, Enomoto H et al (2002) Magnetic stimulation of the sacral roots for the treatment of urinary frequency and urge incontinence: an investigational study and placebo controlled trial. J Urol 168:1036–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiarelli P, Murphy B, Cockburn J (2003) Fecal incontinence after high-risk delivery. Obstet Gynecol:1299–1305

  7. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner U et al (1995) Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 346:1124–1127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Turner IC et al (1999) Effects of short tem sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence. Gut 44:407–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kubota M, Suita S (2002) Assessment of the sphincter muscle function before and after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty using a magnetic spinal stimulation technique. J Pediatr Surg 37:617–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fasth S, Hulten L, Nordgren S (1980) Evidence for a dual pelvic nerve influence on large bowel motility in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 298:159–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maccabee PJ, Lipitz ME, Desudchit T, et al (1996) A new method using neuromagnetic stimulation to measure conduction time within the cauda equina. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 101:153–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shafik A, El-Sibai O (2000) Effect of magnetic stimulation on the contractile activity of the rectum in humans. Am Surg 66:491–494

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubota M, Suita S, Szurszewski JH (1998) Membrane properties and the neuro-effector transmission of smooth muscle cells in the canine internal anal sphincter. J Smooth Muscle Res 34:173–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kubota M, Suita S, Kamimura T (1997) Abnormalities in visceral evoked potentials from the anal canal in children with chronic constipation. Surg Today 27:632–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Emir H, Akman M, Sarimurat N et al (1999) Anorectal manometry during the neonatal period: its specificity in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 9:101–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Brian Quinn for his critical reading of the manuscript. Grant Support: Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (B) (No.14370566) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayuki Kubota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kubota, M., Okuyama, N., Hirayama, Y. et al. Effect of sacral magnetic stimulation on the anorectal manometric activity: a new modality for examining sacro-rectoanal interaction. Pediatr Surg Int 23, 741–745 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1963-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1963-1

Keywords

Navigation