Abstract
Peritoneal drainage in children with uncomplicated perforated appendicitis (UPA) is still controversial. Many pediatric surgeons prefer not to drain the peritoneal cavity in such cases. However, there is no randomized controlled study performed in children. We aimed to study the effects of peritoneal drainage in children with UPA in a randomized prospective trial. One hundred and forty consecutive patients with UPA were divided randomly into 2 groups. Group I (70 patients) consisted of cases with peritoneal drainage, and group II (70 patients) without drainage. UPA is defined as perforated appendicitis with no more discoloration of peritoneal fluid after peritoneal wash out. Cases with localized abscess in the peritoneum were excluded from the study. In all patients, the ages, duration of symptoms, nasogastric drainage and hospitalization, and complications after surgery were recorded. The duration of hospitalization and nasogastric draining time were significantly lower in patients without peritoneal drainage. There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. The onset of oral intake after surgery was significantly earlier in group II patients. Placing drains in the peritoneum does not improve outcome in UPA. Therefore, we do not recommend routine drainage of children with UPA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbasoğlu O, Sayek İ, Hasçelik G (1994) The effects of peritoneal lavage on peritoneal cellular defense mechanisms. Acta Chir Belg 94:321–4
Cameron JS (1995) Host defences in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and the genesis of peritonitis. Pediatr Nephrol 9:647–62
Ciftci AO, Tanyel FC, Buyukpamukcu N, Hicsonmez A (1997) Comparative trial of four antibiotic combinations for perforated appendicitis in children. Eur J Surg 163:591–6
Curran TJ, Muenchow SK (1993) The treatment of perforated appendicitis in children: results from a public hospital. J Pediatr Surg 28:204–208
Dandapat MC, Panda C (1992) A perforated appendix. Should we drain? J Indian Med Assoc 90:147–148
Elmore JR, Dibbins AW, Curci MR (1987) The treatment of complicated appendicitis in children. What is the gold standard? Arch Surg. 122:424–7
Fishman SJ, Pelosi L, Klavon SL, O'Rourke EJ (2000) Perforated appendicitis: prospective outcome analysis for 150 children. J Pediatr Surg 35:923–6
Heel KA, Hall JC (1996) Peritoneal defences and peritoneum-associated lymphoid tissue. Br J Surg 83:1031–6
Lund DP; Murphy EU (1994) Management of perforated appendicitis in children: a decade of aggressive treatment. J Pediatr Surg, 29:1130–3
Pearl RH, Hale DA, Molloy M, Schutt DC, Jaques DP (1995) Pediatric appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 30:173–8
Samuelson SL, Reyes HM (1987) Management of perforated appendicitis in children. Arch Surg 122:691–696
Schwartz MZ, Tapper D, Solenberger RI (1983) Management of perforated appendicitis in children. Ann Surg 197:407–411
Street D, Bodai BI, Owens LJ (1988) Simple ligation vs Stump inversion in Appendectomy. Arch Surg 123:689–690
Toki A, Ogura K, Horimi T, Tokuoka H, Todani T, Watanabe Y, Uemura S, Urushihara N, Noda T, Sato Y (1995) Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children. Surg Today 25:207–10
Yamini D, Vargas H, Bongard F, Klein S, Stamos MJ (1998) Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency? Am Surg 64:970–5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tander, B., Pektas, O. & Bulut, M. The utility of peritoneal drains in children with uncomplicated perforated appendicitis. Ped Surgery Int 19, 548–550 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-003-1029-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-003-1029-y