Abstract
Purpose
Various reconstruction options are available for the soft-tissue coverage of meningomyelocele defects. For small defects, primary closure or local single flaps may be sufficient, while large defects require more complex reconstructive techniques. This study suggests an easy way for surgeons to close large meningomyelocele defects using triple rhomboid flaps.
Methods
The hexagonal structure of a honeycomb was considered when planning for the coverage of large meningomyelocele defects. The intact skin around the defect was imagined as multiple hexagons, which allowed us to plan triple rhomboid flaps correctly and more easily. This technique was used in seven patients with defects ranging from 7 × 5 to 12 × 8 cm in size.
Results
No major postoperative complications were seen. Minimal dehiscence was observed in two patients and healed secondarily.
Conclusions
The honeycomb modification for planning triple rhomboid flaps is an easy, practical, and memorable approach for surgeons reconstructing large meningomyelocele defects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Akan IM, Ulusoy MG, Bilen BT, Kapucu MR (1999) Modified bilateral advancement flap: the slide-in flap. Ann Plast Surg 42(5):545–548
Blanco-Davila F, Luce EA (2000) Current considerations for myelomeningocele repair. J Craniofac Surg 11:500–508
Chasmar LR (2007) The versatile rhomboid (Limberg) flap. Can J Plast Surg 15(2):67–71
Cole P, Armenta A, Dauser R, Hollier L Jr (2008) Simplifying soft tissue closure of the large meningomyelocele defect: a technical note. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(2):192–194
Duffy FJ, Weprin BE, Swift DM (2004) A new approach to closure of large meningomyeloceles: the superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(7):1864–1868
Emsen IM (2015) Closure of large myelomeningocele defects using the O-S flap technique. J Craniofac Surg 26(7):2167–2170
Habibi Z, Nejat F (2014) Myelomeningocele defect closure. Childs Nerv Syst 30(12):2001
Jovanović MD, Colić MM (2004) Design of the Limberg flap by specially designed ruler: a personal approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(2):653–658
Luce EA, Walsh J (1985) Wound closure of the myelomeningocoele defect. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:389–393
Sarifakioglu N, Bingül F, Terzioglu A, Ates L, Aslan G (2003) Bilateral split latissumus dorsi V-Y flaps for closure of large thoracoloumbar meningomyelocel defects. Br J Plast Surg 56(3):303–306
Scheflan M, Mehrhof AI, Ward JD (1988) Meningomyelocele closure with distally based latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Rec Surg 81:454–456
Selcuk CT, Civelek B, Bozkurt M, Kapi E, Kuvat SV (2012) Reconstruction of large meningomyelocele defects with rotation-transposition fasciocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg 69(2):197–202
Ramirez OM, Ramasastry SS, Granick MS et al (1987) A new surgical approach to closure of large lumbosacral meningomyelocele defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:799
Turan T, Kuran I, Ozcan H, Baş L (1999) Geometric limit of multipl local Limberg flaps: a flap design. Plast Reconstr Surg 4(6):1675–1678
William J, Kenneth ES, Miguel AV, Ronald WA (1974) Further applications of the Limberg and Duformentel flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 54:335
Zakaria Y, Hasan EA (2010) Reversed turnover latissimus dorsi muscle flap for closure of large myelomeningocele defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(9):1513–1518
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patients whoparticipated in this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karacor-Altuntas, Z., Dadaci, M., Erdi, F. et al. Facilitating triple rhomboid flaps for meningomyelocele defect closure using a honeycomb structure as a template. Childs Nerv Syst 32, 845–848 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3038-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3038-x