Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ICP monitoring in children: why are we not adhering to guidelines?

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite pediatric guidelines, variability exists in the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), as somewhere between 7 and 60 % of children undergo intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. Reasons for this low adherence to TBI management guidelines remain unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the current practices at CHU Sainte-Justine with regards to ICP monitoring in severe TBI and explore the reasons why ICP monitoring is not undertaken.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients age 1 month to 18 years, with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤8) from 2007 to 2014. Presence of ICP monitoring, head imaging reports, and reasons for lack of monitoring were recorded.

Results

Sixty-four patients with severe TBI were admitted. Twenty (31 %) patients had invasive ICP monitoring in the first 6 h and 5 in the following 24 h. Improvement of the GCS on arrival to tertiary care center (20 %, n = 13) and moribund status (20 %, n = 13) were the two main reasons ICP monitoring was not undertaken. Fourteen patients (21 %) with reassuring cerebral tomography (Rotterdam scores 1–3) and median GCS 7 (IQR 6–8) were initially followed with clinical surveillance, five of which ended up with an ICP monitor (>6 h).

Conclusion

Our study confirms that many children with severe TBI do not undergo ICP monitoring, mainly due to rapid improvement or moribund status. A subgroup of patients, with reassuring cerebral CT scan, was not monitored. Further research is necessary to assess if imaging should be considered in ICP indication, as in adult guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center from Prevention and Injury Control (2012) 10 leading causes of death by age group. http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/pdf/leading_causes_of_death_by_age_group_2012-a.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2015

  2. Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM (2006) Epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil 21:375–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ducrocq SC, Meyer PG, Orliaguet GA et al (2006) Epidemiology and early predictive factors of mortality and outcome in children with traumatic severe brain injury: experience of a French pediatric trauma center. Pediatr Crit Care Med 7:461–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tude Melo JR, Di Rocco F, Blanot S et al (2010) Mortality in children with severe head trauma: predictive factors and proposal for a new predictive scale. Neurosurgery 67:1542–1547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar, J et al. (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 24; suppl 1.

  6. Kochanek PM, Carney N, Adelson PD et al (2012) Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children and adolescents—second edition. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13(Suppl 1):S1–S82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keenan HT, Nocera M, Bratton SL (2005) Frequency of intracranial pressure monitoring in infants and young toddlers with traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6(5):537–541

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morris K, Forsythe R, Parslow R et al (2006) Intracranial pressure complicating severe traumatic brain injury in children: monitoring and management. Intensive Care Med 32:1606–1612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alkhoury F, Kyriakides TC (2014) Intracranial pressure monitoring in children with severe traumatic brain injury. JAMA Surg 149(6):544–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Cleve W, Kernic MA, Ellenbogen RG et al (2013) National variability in the intracranial pressure monitoring and craniotomy for children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery 73:746–752

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maas AI, Hukkelkoven CW, Marshall L et al (2005) Predictors of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison of between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery 57(6):1173–1182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liesemer K, Riva-Cambrin J, Bennett KS et al (2014) Use of Rotterdam CT scores for mortality risk stratification in children with traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med 15(6):554–562

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical standard statement

Study was conducted with ethics board approval and met highest ethical standards.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Critical Care, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montréal, 3175 Cote Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3T 1C5

    Nadia Roumeliotis, Géraldine Pettersen & Guillaume Émeriaud

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montréal, 3175 Cote Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3T 1C5

    Louis Crevier

Authors
  1. Nadia Roumeliotis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Géraldine Pettersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Louis Crevier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guillaume Émeriaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Roumeliotis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roumeliotis, N., Pettersen, G., Crevier, L. et al. ICP monitoring in children: why are we not adhering to guidelines?. Childs Nerv Syst 31, 2011–2014 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2837-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2837-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation