Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Neurodevelopmental and esthetic results in children after surgical correction of metopic suture synostosis: a single institutional experience

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Metopic suture synostosis leading to trigonocephaly is considered the second most frequent type of craniosynostosis. Besides esthetic results, we present 25 consecutive pediatric cases operated upon metopic suture synostosis with a focus on the child’s motor, speech, and neurocognitive development.

Methods

Twenty-five children (aged 6 to 33 months; median 9.2 months) with trigonocephaly were operated upon between 2002 and 2012 with fronto-orbital advancement including frontal bone cranioplasty and fronto-orbital bandeau remodeling. Neurodevelopmental deficits were evaluated by a standardized questionnaire including gross motor function, manual coordination, speech, and cognitive function performed by independent pediatric/developmental neurologists before surgery and at 6 and 12 months of time interval postoperatively.

Results

Twenty-one (84 %) boys and four (16 %) girls were included in this study. Mean follow-up period was 33 ± 28 months. Outcome analysis for esthetic results showed a high degree of satisfaction by the parents and treating physicians in 23 cases (92 %). Preoperative evaluation revealed neurodevelopmental deficits in 10 children (40 %; six mild, four moderate degree). Twelve children (48 %) were proven to have a normal preoperative neuropediatric development. Mild or moderate developmental restraints were no longer apparent in 6/13, improved but still apparent in 3/13, and stable in 4/13, 6 months after cranial vault reconstruction. At 12 months of follow-up, deficits were no longer present in 9/13 and improved in 4/13. Apart from this cohort, two children were diagnosed with a syndromic form, and one child had a fetal valproate syndrome. In these three children, neurodevelopmental deficits were more pronounced. Neurocognitive progress was obvious, but was comparably slower, and major deficits were still apparent at last follow-up. All children with proven mild/moderate/severe deficits received intensive physiotherapy, logopedic, or neurobehavioral support.

Conclusions

As shown in a single-center observation, surgical correction of metopic suture synostosis not only refines esthetic appearance but also might improve neurodevelopmental outcome if deficits are apparent, even in syndromic forms of the deformity under additional physiotherapy, logopedic, or neurobehavioral support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van der Meulen J (2012) Metopic synostosis. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 28:1359–1367, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kweldam CF, van der Vlugt JJ, van der Meulen JJ (2011) The incidence of craniosynostosis in the Netherlands, 1997–2007. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg: JPRAS 64:583–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Rocco F, Arnaud E, Meyer P, Sainte-Rose C, Renier D (2009) Focus session on the changing “epidemiology” of craniosynostosis (comparing two quinquennia: 1985–1989 and 2003–2007) and its impact on the daily clinical practice: a review from Necker Enfants Malades. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 25:807–811, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Rocco F, Arnaud E, Renier D (2009) Evolution in the frequency of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 4:21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Meulen J, van der Hulst R, van Adrichem L, Arnaud E, Chin-Shong D, Duncan C, Habets E, Hinojosa J, Mathijssen I, May P, Morritt D, Nishikawa H, Noons P, Richardson D, Wall S, van der Vlugt J, Renier D (2009) The increase of metopic synostosis: a pan-European observation. J Craniofac Surg 20:283–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradley JP, Levine JP, Blewett C, Krummel T, McCarthy JG, Longaker MT (1996) Studies in cranial suture biology: in vitro cranial suture fusion. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 33:150–156, Official Publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley JP, Levine JP, Roth DA, McCarthy JG, Longaker MT (1996) Studies in cranial suture biology: IV. Temporal sequence of posterior frontal cranial suture fusion in the mouse. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:1039–1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tamburrini G, Caldarelli M, Massimi L, Santini P, Di Rocco C (2005) Intracranial pressure monitoring in children with single suture and complex craniosynostosis: a review. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 21:913–921, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Michaelis R, Niemann G (1999) Das Prinzip der essentiellen Grenzsteine. In: Niemann G, Krägeloh-Mann I, Mayerhofer-Kahle H (eds) Entwicklungsneurologie und Pädiatrie. Hippokrates, Stuttgart, pp 62–74

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michaelis Richard NG (2010) Entwicklungsneurologie und Neuropädiatrie: Grundlagen und diagnostische Strategien. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mendonca DA, White N, West E, Dover S, Solanki G, Nishikawa H (2009) Is there a relationship between the severity of metopic synostosis and speech and language impairments? J Craniofac Surg 20:85–88, discussion 89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kolar JC (2011) An epidemiological study of nonsyndromal craniosynostoses. J Craniofac Surg 22:47–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Engel M, Thiele OC, Muhling J, Hoffmann J, Freier K, Castrillon-Oberndorfer G, Seeberger R (2012) Trigonocephaly: results after surgical correction of nonsyndromatic isolated metopic suture synostosis in 54 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40:347–353, Official Publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hormozi AK, Shahverdiani R, Mohammadi HR, Zali A, Mofrad HR (2011) Surgical treatment of metopic synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 22:261–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenberg BM, Schneider SJ (2006) Trigonocephaly: surgical considerations and long term evaluation. J Craniofac Surg 17:528–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Meulen JJ, Nazir PR, Mathijssen IM, van Adrichem LN, Ongkosuwito E, Stolk-Liefferink SA, Vaandrager MJ (2008) Bitemporal depressions after cranioplasty for trigonocephaly: a long-term evaluation of (supra) orbital growth in 92 patients. J Craniofac Surg 19:72–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Renier D, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D (2000) Management of craniosynostoses. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 16:645–658, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bottero L, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D, Renier D (1998) Functional outcome after surgery for trigonocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:952–958, discussion 959-960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayward R, Jones B, Evans R (1999) Functional outcome after surgery for trigonocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:582–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kapp-Simon KA, Speltz ML, Cunningham ML, Patel PK, Tomita T (2007) Neurodevelopment of children with single suture craniosynostosis: a review. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 23:269–281, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelleher MO, Murray DJ, McGillivary A, Kamel MH, Allcutt D, Earley MJ (2006) Behavioral, developmental, and educational problems in children with nonsyndromic trigonocephaly. J Neurosurg 105:382–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kelleher MO, Murray DJ, McGillivary A, Kamel MH, Allcutt D, Earley MJ (2007) Non-syndromic trigonocephaly: surgical decision making and long-term cosmetic results. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 23:1285–1289, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Warschausky S, Angobaldo J, Kewman D, Buchman S, Muraszko KM, Azengart A (2005) Early development of infants with untreated metopic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1518–1523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aryan HE, Jandial R, Ozgur BM, Hughes SA, Meltzer HS, Park MS, Levy ML (2005) Surgical correction of metopic synostosis. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 21:392–398, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Collmann H, Sorensen N, Krauss J (2005) Hydrocephalus in craniosynostosis: a review. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 21:902–912, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Da Costa AC, Anderson VA, Savarirayan R, Wrennall JA, Chong DK, Holmes AD, Greensmith AL, Meara JG (2012) Neurodevelopmental functioning of infants with untreated single-suture craniosynostosis during early infancy. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 28:869–877, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shimoji T, Shimabukuro S, Sugama S, Ochiai Y (2002) Mild trigonocephaly with clinical symptoms: analysis of surgical results in 65 patients. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 18:215–224, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimoji T, Tomiyama N (2004) Mild trigonocephaly and intracranial pressure: report of 56 patients. Child’s Nerv Syst: ChNS 20:749–756, Official Journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery

    Google Scholar 

  29. Warren SM, Proctor MR, Bartlett SP, Blount JP, Buchman SR, Burnett W, Fearon JA, Keating R, Muraszko KM, Rogers GF, Rubin MS, McCarthy JG (2012) Parameters of care for craniosynostosis: craniofacial and neurologic surgery perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:731–737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany

    Mathias Kunz, Lena Armbruster & Aurelia Peraud

  2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Lindwurmstrasse 4, 80377, Munich, Germany

    Markus Lehner & Alfred Heger

  3. Department of Pediatric Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Lindwurmstrasse 4, 80377, Munich, Germany

    Heike Weigand

  4. Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Lindwurmstrasse 2a, 80377, Munich, Germany

    Gerson Mast

Authors
  1. Mathias Kunz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Lehner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alfred Heger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lena Armbruster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Heike Weigand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gerson Mast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Aurelia Peraud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurelia Peraud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunz, M., Lehner, M., Heger, A. et al. Neurodevelopmental and esthetic results in children after surgical correction of metopic suture synostosis: a single institutional experience. Childs Nerv Syst 30, 1075–1082 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2340-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2340-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation