Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changes in intracranial CSF distribution after ETV

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this prospective study was to analyze the changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) distribution after endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy (ETV).

Methods

Twenty-two hydrocephalic children (eight boys, aged 3 months to 17 years) candidates for ETV were studied by preoperative brain magnetic resonance (MR) and repeated post-ETV MRs at established time intervals. A volumetric analysis of CSF distribution after ETV was performed using a specific software.

Results

Fifteen children had an uneventful follow-up, whereas four required a second ETV due to a secondary closure of the stoma, one died of acute intracranial hypertension, and two needed an extrathecal shunt. A progressive reduction in the volume of the ventricles was found in case of successful ETV during the follow-up period. The ventricular volumes were reduced in average of 76 % of the initial volume at day 3, 69 % at 2 weeks, 42 % at 2 months, and 40 % at 6 months. This finding was associated with an enlargement of subarachnoid spaces which increased in case of successful ETV (192 % of initial volume at day 3; 210 % at day 15; 428 % at 2 months; and 468 % at 6 months). In case of secondary closure of the stoma, the distribution of intra- and extraventricular CSF tended to go back to the preoperative status.

Conclusion

Volume variations of the ventricles and the subarachnoid spaces are a good indicator of the efficacy of the ETV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goumnerova LC, Frim DM (1997) Treatment of hydrocephalus with third ventriculocisternostomy: outcome and CSF flow patterns. Pediatr Neurosurg 27(3):149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nishiyama K, Mori H, Tanaka R (2003) Changes in cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics following endoscopic third ventriculostomy for shunt-dependent noncommunicating hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 98(5):1027–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feng H, Huang G, Liao X, Fu K, Tan H, Pu H, Cheng Y, Liu W, Zhao D (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of obstructive hydrocephalus: an outcome analysis. J Neurosurg 100(4):626–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Erşahin Y, Arslan D (2008) Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst 24(8):943–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kadrian D, van Gelder J, Florida D, Jones R, Vonau M, Teo C, Stening W, Kwok B (2005) Long-term reliability of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 56(6):1271–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Navarro R, Gil-Parra R, Reitman AJ, Olavarria G, Grant JA, Tomita T (2006) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children: early and late complications and their avoidance. Childs Nerv Syst 22(5):506–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Drake JM (2007) Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study Group. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in pediatric patients: the Canadian experience. Neurosurgery 60(5):881–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xenos C, Sgouros S, Natarajan K (2002) Ventricular volume change in childhood. J Neurosurg 97(3):584–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bargalló N, Olondo L, Garcia AI, Capurro S, Caral L, Rumia J (2005) Functional analysis of third ventriculostomy patency by quantification of CSF stroke volume by using cine phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(10):2514–2521

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buxton N, Turner B, Ramli N, Vloeberghs M (2002) Changes in third ventricular size with neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy: a blinded study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72(3):385–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Armstrong DC, Dirks PB (2000) Imaging correlates of successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 92:915–919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwartz TH, Ho B, Prestigiacomo CJ, Bruce JN, Feldstein NA, Goodman RR (1999) Ventricular volume following third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 91(1):20–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. St George E, Natarajan K, Sgouros S (2004) Changes in ventricular volume in hydrocephalic children following successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst 20(11–12):834–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Preul C, Tittgemeyer M, Lindner D, Trantakis C, Meixensberger J (2004) Quantitative assessment of parenchymal and ventricular readjustment to intracranial pressure relief. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25(3):377–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Chumas P, Zerah M, Brunelle F, Lot G, Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D (1999) Failure of third ventriculostomy in the treatment of aqueductal stenosis in children. J Neurosurg 90(3):448–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Sainte-Rose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Rocco, F., Grevent, D., Drake, J.M. et al. Changes in intracranial CSF distribution after ETV. Childs Nerv Syst 28, 997–1002 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1752-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1752-6

Keywords

Navigation