Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced atrial conduction velocity is associated with the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA) is still an unsolved issue. Although structural remodeling is relatively well defined, the method to assess electrical remodeling of the atrium is not well established. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between atrial conduction properties and recurrence after CA for AF. One hundred six consecutive patients (66 ± 11 years old, male: 68%) who underwent CA for AF with a CARTO system from July 2016 to July 2019 were enrolled in this study. An activation map of both atria was constructed to precisely evaluate the total conduction time, distance, and conduction velocity between the earliest and latest activation sites during sinus rhythm. All parameters were compared between the patients with or without AF recurrence. Of the patients, 27 had an AF recurrence (Rec group). The left atrial (LA) conduction velocity was significantly slower in the Rec group than in the non-Rec group (101.2 ± 17.9 vs. 116.9 ± 18.0 cm/s, P < 0.01). Likewise, the right atrial (RA) conduction velocity was significantly slower in the Rec group than in the non-Rec group (81.1 ± 17.5 vs. 103.6 ± 25.4 cm/s, P < 0.01). A multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that the LA and RA conduction velocities were independent predictors of AF recurrence, with adjusted odds ratios of 0.95 (95% confidential interval: 0.91–0.98, P < 0.01) and 0.94 (0.89–0.98, P < 0.01), respectively. In conclusion, slower conduction velocity of the atrium was associated with AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Lundqvist CB, Boriani G, Castella M, Dan GA, Dilaveris PE, Fauchier L, Filippatos G, Kalman JM, Meir ML (2021) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS) the task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the Europe. Eur Heart J 42(5):373–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blanche C, Tran N, Rigamonti F, Burri H, Zimmermann M (2013) Value of P-wave signal averaging to predict atrial fibrillation recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation. Europace 15(2):198–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuppahally SS, Akoum N, Burgon NS, Badger TJ, Kholmovski EG, Vijayakumar S, Rao SN, Blauer J, Fish EN, DiBella EVR, MacLeod RS, McGann C, Litwin SE, Marrouche NF (2010) Left atrial strain and strain rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: relationship to left atrial structural remodeling detected by delayed-enhancement MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3(3):231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Masuda M, Fujita M, Iida O, Okamoto S, Ishihara T, Nanto K, Kanda T, Tsujimura T, Matsuda Y, Okuno S, Ohashi T, Tsuji A, Mano T (2018) Left atrial low-voltage areas predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 257:97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang YS, Chen GY, Li XH, Zhou X, Li YG (2017) Prolonged P-wave duration is associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 227:355–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chao TF, Sung SH, Wang KL, Lin YJ, Chang SL, Lo LW, Hu YF, Tuan TC, Suenari K, Li CH, Ueng KC, Wu TJ, Chen SA (2011) Associations between the atrial electromechanical interval, atrial remodeling and outcome of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart 97(3):225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Higuchi S, Ejima K, Shoda M, Yamamoto E, Iwanami Y, Yagishita D, Hagiwara N (2019) Impact of a prolonged interatrial conduction time for predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Vessels 34(4):616–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ehrlich JR, Nattel S, Hohnloser SH (2002) Atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure: Specific considerations at the intersection of two common and important cardiac disease sets. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 13:399–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshizawa T, Niwano S, Niwano H, Igarashi T, Fujiishi T, Ishizue N, Oikawa J, Satoh A, Kurokawa S, Hatakeyama Y, Fukaya H, Ako J (2014) Prediction of new onset atrial fibrillation through P wave analysis in 12 lead ECG. Int Heart J 55:422–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurata N, Masuda M, Kanda T, Asai M, Iida O, Okamoto S, Ishihara T, Nanto K, Tsujimura T, Matsuda Y, Hata Y, Mano T (2020) Slow whole left atrial conduction velocity after pulmonary vein isolation predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 31(8):1942–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Parkash R, Green MS, Kerr CR, Connolly SJ, Klein GJ, Sheldon R, Talajic M, Dorian P, Humphries KH (2004) The association of left atrial size and occurrence of atrial fibrillation: a prospective cohort study from the Canadian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. Am Heart J 148(4):649–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Corradi D, Callegari S, Benussi S, Maestri R, Pastori P, Nascimbene S, Bosio S, Dorigo E, Grassani C, Rusconi R, Vettori MV, Alinovi R, Astorri E, Pappone C, Alfieri O (2005) Myocyte changes and their left atrial distribution in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation related to mitral valve disease. Hum Pathol 36(10):1080–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kostin S, Klein G, Szalay Z, Hein S, Bauer EP, Schaper J (2002) Structural correlate of atrial fibrillation in human patients. Cardiovasc Res 54(2):361–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burstein B, Nattel S (2008) Atrial fibrosis: mechanisms and clinical relevance in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(8):802–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li D, Fareh S, Leung TK, Nattel S (1999) Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort. Circulation 100(1):87–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Verheule S, Wilson E, Everett T IV, Shanbhag S, Golden C, Olgin J (2003) Alterations in atrial electrophysiology and tissue structure in a canine model of chronic atrial dilatation due to Mitral Regurgitation. Circulation 107(20):2615–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lau DH, Psaltis PJ, Mackenzie L, Kelly DJ, Carbone A, Worthington M, Nelson AJ, Zhang Y, Kuklik P, Wong CX, Edwards J, Saint DA, Worthley SG, Sanders P (2011) Atrial remodeling in an ovine model of anthracycline-induced nonischemic cardiomyopathy: Remodeling of the same sort. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 22(2):175–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Verma A, Jiang C, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P (2015) Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 372(19):1812–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Knecht S, Hocini M, Wright M, Lellouche N, Oneill MD, Matsuo S, Nault I, Chauhan VS, Makati KJ, Bevilacqua M, Lim KT, Sacher F, Deplagne A, Derval N, Bordachar P, Jais P, Clementy J, Haissaguerre M (2008) Left atrial linear lesions are required for successful treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 29(19):2359–2366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. He X, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Wu L, Huang Y, He J (2016) Left atrial posterior wall isolation reduces the recurrence of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 46(3):267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Willems S, Klemm H, Rostock T, Brandstrup B, Ventura R, Steven D, Risius T, Lutomsky B, Meinertz T (2006) Substrate modification combined with pulmonary vein isolation improves outcome of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized comparison. Eur Heart J 27(23):2871–2878

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidehira Fukaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sato, T., Fukaya, H., Oikawa, J. et al. Reduced atrial conduction velocity is associated with the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. Heart Vessels 37, 628–637 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01952-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01952-6

Keywords

Navigation