Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of sinus rhythm maintenance on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from AF frontier ablation registry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) on cardiovascular events and mortality is controversial. We investigated the impact of sinus rhythm maintenance on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after AF ablation from a Japanese multicenter cohort of AF ablation. We investigated 3326 consecutive patients (25.8% female, mean age 63.3 ± 10.3 years) who underwent catheter ablation for AF from the atrial fibrillation registry to follow the long-term outcomes and use of anti coagulants after ablation (AF frontier ablation registry). The primary endpoint was a composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack, cardiovascular events, and all-cause death. During a mean follow-up of 24.0 months, 2339 (70.3%) patients were free from AF after catheter ablation, and the primary composite endpoint occurred in 144 (4.3%) patients. The AF nonrecurrence group had a significantly lower incidence of the primary endpoint (1.8 per 100 person-years) compared with the AF recurrence group (3.0 per 100 person-years, p = 0.003). The multivariate analysis revealed that freedom from AF (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.44–0.86, p = 0.005) was independently associated with the incidence of the composite event. In the multicenter cohort of AF ablation, sinus rhythm maintenance after catheter ablation was independently associated with lower rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability and materials

The deidentified participant data will not be shared.

References

  1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB (1991) Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 22:983–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ (2002) A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20 year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med 113:359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D (1998) Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 98:946–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunch TJ, Crandall BG, Weiss JP, May HT, Bair TL, Osborn JS, Anderson JL, Muhlestein JB, Horne BD, Lappe DL, Day JD (2011) Patients treated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation have long-term rates of death, stroke, and dementia similar to patients without atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 22:839–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang CH, Lin JW, Chiu FC, Caffrey JL, Wu LC, Lai MS (2014) Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation on morbidity and mortality: a nationwide cohort study and propensity score analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7:76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Friberg L, Tabrizi F, Englund A (2016) Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with lower incidence of stroke and death: data from Swedish health registries. Eur Heart J 37:2478–2487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Modin D, Claggett B, Gislason G, Hansen ML, Worck R, Johannessen A, Hansen J, Svendsen JH, Pallisgaard JL, Schou M, Køber L, Solomon SD, Torp-Pedersen C, Biering-Sørensen T (2020) Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with lower incidence of heart failure and death. Europace 22:74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reynolds MR, Gunnarsson CL, Hunter TD, Ladapo JA, March JL, Zhang M, Hao SC (2012) Health outcomes with catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy in atrial fibrillation: results of a propensity-matched analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 5:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Okumura Y, Nagashima K, Arai M, Watanabe R, Yokoyama K, Matsumoto N, Otsuka T, Suzuki S, Hirata A, Murakami M, Takami M, Kimura M, Fukaya H, Nakahara S, Kato T, Shimizu W, Iwasaki YK, Hayashi H, Harada T, Nakajima I, Okumura K, Koyama J, Tokuda M, Yamane T, Momiyama Y, Tanimoto K, Soejima K, Nonoguchi N, Ejima K, Hagiwara N, Harada M, Sonoda K, Inoue M, Kumagai K, Hayashi H, Satomi K, Yazaki Y, Watari Y (2019) Current Status and clinical outcomes of oral anticoagulant discontinuation after ablation for atrial fibrillation in Japan—findings from the AF frontier ablation registry. Circ J 83:2418–2427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:e1-76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Cosedis Nielsen J, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d’Avila A, Natasja de Groot NMS, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T (2018) 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 20:e1–e160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 37:2893–2962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Métayer P, Clémenty J (1998) Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 339:659–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, Elvan A, Arentz T, Bestehorn K, Pocock SJ, Albenque JP, Tondo C (2016) Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 374:2235–2245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Watson T, Shantsila E, Lip GY (2009) Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: Virchow’s triad revisited. Lancet 373:155–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Naito M, David D, Michelson EL, Schaffenburg M, Dreifus LS (1983) The hemodynamic consequences of cardiac arrhythmias: evaluation of the relative roles of abnormal atrioventricular sequencing, irregularity of ventricular rhythm and atrial fibrillation in a canine model. Am Heart J 106:284–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gopinathannair R, Etheridge SP, Marchlinski FE, Spinale FG, Lakkireddy D, Olshansky B (2015) Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathies: mechanisms, recognition, and management. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:1714–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD (2002) A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 347:1825–1833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Geller N, Greene HL, Josephson RA, Kellen JC, Klein RC, Krahn AD, Mickel M, Mitchell LB, Nelson JD, Rosenberg Y, Schron E, Shemanski L, Waldo AL, Wyse DG (2004) Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the atrial fibrillation follow-up investigation of rhythm management (AFFIRM) study. Circulation 109:1509–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin YJ, Chao TF, Tsao HM, Chang SL, Lo LW, Chiang CE, Hu YF, Hsu PF, Chuang SY, Li CH, Chung FP, Chen YY, Wu TJ, Hsieh MH, Chen SA (2013) Successful catheter ablation reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation patients with CHA2DS2-VASc risk score of 1 and higher. Europace 15:676–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter RJ, McCready J, Diab I, Page SP, Finlay M, Richmond L, French A, Earley MJ, Sporton S, Jones M, Joseph JP, Bashir Y, Betts TR, Thomas G, Staniforth A, Lee G, Kistler P, Rajappan K, Chow A, Schilling RJ (2012) Maintenance of sinus rhythm with an ablation strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with a lower risk of stroke and death. Heart 98:48–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghanbari H, Başer K, Jongnarangsin K, Chugh A, Nallamothu BK, Gillespie BW, Başer HD, Suwanagool A, Crawford T, Latchamsetty R, Good E, Pelosi F Jr, Bogun F, Morady F, Oral H (2014) Mortality and cerebrovascular events after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 11:1503–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, Pogue J, Reilly PA, Themeles E, Varrone J, Wang S, Alings M, Xavier D, Zhu J, Diaz R, Lewis BS, Darius H, Diener HC, Joyner CD, Wallentin L (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361:1139–1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, Al-Khalidi HR, Ansell J, Atar D, Avezum A, Bahit MC, Diaz R, Easton JD, Ezekowitz JA, Flaker G, Garcia D, Geraldes M, Gersh BJ, Golitsyn S, Goto S, Hermosillo AG, Hohnloser SH, Horowitz J, Mohan P, Jansky P, Lewis BS, Lopez-Sendon JL, Pais P, Parkhomenko A, Verheugt FW, Zhu J, Wallentin L (2011) Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:981–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamashita T, Koretsune Y, Yang Y, Chen SA, Chung N, Shimada YJ, Kimura T, Miyazaki K, Abe K, Mercuri M, Ruff CT, Giugliano RP (2016) Edoxaban vs. Warfarin in East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation—an ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Subanalysis. Circ J 80:860–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chai-Adisaksopha C, Hillis C, Isayama T, Lim W, Iorio A, Crowther M (2015) Mortality outcomes in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Thromb Haemost 13:2012–2020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Appleton CP, Douglas PS, Oh JK, Tajik AJ, Tsang TS (2006) Left atrial size: physiologic determinants and clinical applications. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2357–2363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ (2001) Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 285:2864–2870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Atrial Fibrillation Investigators (1994) Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 154:1449–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamamoto K, Ikeda U, Furuhashi K, Irokawa M, Nakayama T, Shimada K (1995) The coagulation system is activated in idiopathic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:1634–1640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

None.

Funding

This study was supported by a research grant from Bristol-Meyers Squibb.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Kato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The following authors have potential conflicts of interest: T.K. received a research grant from Daiichi-Sankyo, and lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and honoraria for writing promotional material for Bristol-Myers Squibb. S.S. received research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo and Mitsubishi-Tanabe. A.H. accepted remuneration from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo. M. Kimura accepted remuneration from Johnson & Johnson K.K., Medtronic Japan, Bayer Healthcare. H. Fukaya received lecture fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi-Sankyo. S. Nakahara received lecture fees from Bayer Healthcare, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Pfizer Japan, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. W.S. received research funding from Bristol–Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and patent royalties/licensing fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer Healthcare, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. T.H. serves as a consultant to Medtronic Japan and has received lecture fees from Daiichi-Sankyo. I.N. received a scholarship from the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society and speaking honoraria from Medtronic Japan. K.O. received remuneration from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Medtronic Japan. M. Tokuda serves as a consultant to Medtronic Japan. T.Y. received lecture fees from Daiichi-Sankyo and Abbott Medical Japan. K.T. received lecture fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer Japan, Bayer Healthcare. K. Soejima received research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and accepted remuneration from Medtronic Japan, Jonson & Jonson, and Abbott Medical Japan. N.H. accepted remuneration from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer Healthcare, and research funding from Bayer Healthcare, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo. M.H. received lecture fee from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Johnson & Johnson. K. Satomi and Y.Y. received research funding from BIOTRONIK Japan. N.M. received research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo. Y.O. received research funding from Bayer Healthcare, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer Japan, TORAY, and Boston Scientific Japan and has accepted remuneration from Bayer Healthcare, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Bristol-Meyers Squibb. Other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The protocol of this study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Nihon University Itabashi Hospital (RK-161213–6) along with the Institutional Review Boards of all participating institutions.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Usuda, K., Kato, T., Tsuda, T. et al. Impact of sinus rhythm maintenance on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from AF frontier ablation registry. Heart Vessels 37, 327–336 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01929-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01929-5

Keywords

Navigation