Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate using split-bolus contrast injection (SPBI) with volume scanning of the heart and aortic root with helical scanning of the access route, compared to single bolus contrast injection (SI) with variable helical pitch scanning (VHP) of the heart and aortic root and access route in a preoperative evaluation before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Thirty-five patients who underwent preoperative CT before TAVI using SPBI (contrast media: 24.5 mgI /kg/s, injected for 12 s for heart scan and then injected for 8 s for access route) were examined. Electrocardiogram (ECG) gated scans of the heart were performed by volume scan, after a period of time, non-gated helical scans of the aorto-iliac were performed (SPBI method). For comparison, 40 patients who had a single bolus injection (26.5 mg I/kg/s, injected for period of the scan time plus 3 s) and a VHP scan (SI method) before the SPBI method was performed were included in the study. The image qualities of the coronary arteries, aortic root, and access route (aorta-iliac), as well as radiation and iodine doses, were assessed. In visual assessment, image quality of coronary artery was significantly better with the SPBI method (grade; excellent: 57.1% in SPBI vs. 24.3% in SI, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in image quality of the aortic root by visual assessment. The signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of coronary and aortic root were not significantly different between the two methods. The access route showed significantly higher SNR (45.7 ± 11.5 vs. 34.3 ± 9.8, p < 0.001) and CNR (36.0 ± 9.7 vs. 28.0 ± 8.8, p < 0.001) for the SPBI method. The SPBI method compared to SI method reduced iodine dose by 10% and radiation dose by 45%. Preoperative CT imaging before TAVI using SPBI with volume scan is useful and can reduce iodine and radiation doses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ADCT:
-
Area detector CT
- CM:
-
Contrast media
- SI:
-
Single bolus injection
- SPBI:
-
Split-bolus injection
- TAVI:
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- VHP:
-
Variable helical pitch
- TECs:
-
Time-enhanced curves
References
Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, Svensson LG, Webb JG, Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Dewey TM, Thourani VH, Pichard AD, Fischbein M, Szeto WY, Lim S, Greason KL, Teirstein PS, Malaisrie SC, Douglas PS, Hahn RT, Whisenant B, Zajarias A, Wang D, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Leon MB, Trial Investigators PARTNER (2012) Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 366(18):1686–1695
Webb JG, Wood DA (2012) Current status of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(6):483–492
Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Brown DL, Block PC, Guyton RA, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Douglas PS, Petersen JL, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock S, Trial Investigators PARTNER (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363(17):1597–1607
Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA (2012) SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6(6):366–380
Matsumoto S, Yamada Y, Hashimoto M, Okamura T, Yamada M, Yashima F, Hayashida K, Fukuda K, Jinzaki M (2017) CT imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using variable helical pitch scanning and its diagnostic performance for coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 27(5):1963–1970
Shin N, Kim SM, Choe YH (2019) Protocol using wide-detector CT with single contrast injection for the aorta and coronary artery: variable helical pitch versus volume scan following helical scan. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 35(10):1935–1942
Abbara S, Blanke P, Maroules CD, Cheezum M, Choi AD, Han BK, Marwan M, Naoum C, Norgaard BL, Rubinshtein R, Schoenhagen P, Villines T, Leipsic J (2016) SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10(6):435–449
Takagi M, Kaneko T, Kato R, Anno H, Yoshimi S, Ida Y, Sanda Y, Katada K (2011) Evaluation of 320-row area detector computed tomography (ADCT) coronary angiography for patients with atrial fibrillation. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 67(4):321–327
Pasricha SS, Nandurkar D, Seneviratne SK, Cameron JD, Crossett M, Schneider-Kolsky ME, Troupis JM (2009) Image quality of coronary 320-MDCT in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(6):1514–1521
Mata-Mbemba D, Labani A, El Ghannudi S, Jeung MY, Ohlmann P, Roy C, Ohana M (2018) 320-row CT transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning with a single reduced contrast media bolus injection. PLoS ONE 13(9):e0204145
Felmly LM, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, Varga-Szemes A, Mangold S, McQuiston AD, Litwin SE, Bayer RR 2nd, Vogl TJ, Wichmann JL (2017) Low contrast medium-volume third-generation dual-source computed tomography angiography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning. Eur Radiol 27(5):1944–1953
Ko SM, Kim NR, Kim DH, Song MG, Kim JH (2010) Assessment of image quality and radiation dose in prospective ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography compared with retrospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26(Suppl 1):93–101
Mori S, Nishizawa K, Ohno M, Endo M (2006) Conversion factor for CT dosimetry to assess patient dose using a 256-slice CT scanner. Br J Radiol 79(947):888–892
Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Vorobiof G, Nallamshetty L, Mitsouras D, Ersoy H, Mather RT, Judy PF, Cai T, Coyner K, Schultz K, Whitmore AG, Di Carli MF (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24(5):535–546
Hoe J, Toh KH (2009) First experience with 320-row multidetector CT coronary angiography scanning with prospective electrocardiogram gating to reduce radiation dose. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(4):257–261
Trattner S, Halliburton S, Thompson CM, Xu Y, Chelliah A, Jambawalikar SR, Peng B, Peters MR, Jacobs JE, Ghesani M, Jang JJ, Al-Khalidi H, Einstein AJ (2018) Cardiac-specific conversion factors to estimate radiation effective dose from dose-length product in computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11(1):64–74
Nerlekar N, Ko BS, Nasis A, Cameron JD, Leung M, Brown AJ, Wong DTL, Ngu PJ, Troupis JM, Seneviratne SK (2017) Impact of heart rate on diagnostic accuracy of second generation 320-detector computed tomography coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 7(3):296–304
Lee AB, Nandurkar D, Schneider-Kolsky ME, Crossett M, Seneviratne SK, Cameron JD, Troupis JM (2011) Coronary image quality of 320-MDCT in patients with heart rates above 65 beats per minute: preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(6):W729–W735
Sherwood MW, Vora AN (2018) Challenges in aortic stenosis: review of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy management with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): TAVR with recent PCI, TAVR in the patient with atrial fibrillation, and TAVR thrombosis management. Curr Cardiol Rep 20(12):130
Holmes DR Jr, Brennan JM, Rumsfeld JS, Dai D, O’Brien SM, Vemulapalli S, Edwards FH, Carroll J, Shahian D, Grover F, Tuzcu EM, Peterson ED, Brindis RG, Mack MJ, STS, ACC TVT Registry, (2015) Clinical outcomes at 1 year following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JAMA 313(10):1019–1028
Fei X, Du X, Yang Q, Shen Y, Li P, Liao J, Li K (2008) 64-MDCT coronary angiography: phantom study of effects of vascular attenuation on detection of coronary stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(1):43–49
Bruce RJ, Djamali A, Shinki K, Michel SJ, Fine JP, Pozniak MA (2009) Background fluctuation of kidney function versus contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. AJR Am J Roentgeno 192(3):711–718
Mack MJ, Brennan JM, Brindis R, Carroll J, Edwards F, Grover F, Shahian D, Tuzcu EM, Peterson ED, Rumsfeld JS, Hewitt K, Shewan C, Michaels J, Christensen B, Christian A, O’Brien S, Holmes D, STS, ACC TVT Registry, (2013) Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States. JAMA 310(19):2069–2077
Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Yu Z, Zhou J, Lu Y, Fujioka C, Kitagawa T, Kihara Y, Iida M, Awai K (2019) Deep learning-based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol 29(10):5322–5329
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koyanagi, H., Tsutsumi, Y., Tokuda, Y. et al. Computed tomography imaging using split-bolus contrast injection with volume scan of aortic root and heart for preoperative evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart Vessels 37, 132–141 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01899-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-021-01899-8