Abstract
There are large uncertainties in the quantitative assessment of radiative effects due to atmospheric dust aerosol. The optical properties contribute much to those uncertainties. The authors perform several sensitivity experiments to estimate the impacts of optical characteristics on regional radiative forcing in this paper. The experiments involve in refractive indices, single scattering albedo, asymmetry factor and optical depth. An updated dataset of refractive indices representing East Asian dust and the one recommended by the World Meteorology Organization (WMO) are contrastively analyzed and used. A radiative transfer code for solar and thermal infrared radiation with detailed aerosol parameterization is employed. The strongest emphasis is on the refractive indices since other optical parameters strongly depend on it, and the authors found a strong sensitivity of radiative forcing on refractive indices. Studies show stronger scattering, weaker absorption and forward scattering of the East Asian dust particles at solar wavelengths, which leads to higher negative forcing, lower positive forcing and bigger net forcing at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) than that of the WMO dust model. It is also found that the TOA forcings resulting from these two dust models have opposite signs in certain regions, which implies the importance of accurate measurements of optical properties in the quantitative estimation of radiative forcing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, S. A., and H. Chung, 1992: Radiative effects of airborne dust on regional energy budgets at the top of the atmosphere. J. Appl. Meteor., 31, 223–233.
Fouquart, Y., B. Bronnel, and D. Brognig, 1987: Observation of Saharan aerosols: Results of ECLATS field experiment, part II—Broadland radiative characteristics of the aerosols and vertical radiative flux divergences. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 26, 38–25.
Gong, S. L.,X. Y. Zhang, T. L. Zhao, I. G. McKendry, D. A. Jaffe, and N. M. Lu., 2003a: Characterization of soil dust aerosol in China and its transport and distribution during 2001 ACE-Asia: 2. Model simulation and validation. J. Geophys Res., 108, 4262, doi:10.1029/2002JD002633.
Gong, S. L., and Coauthors, 2003b: Canadian Aerosol Module: A size-segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol processes for climate and air quality models: 1. Module development. J. Geophys. Res., 108(D1), 4007, doi:10.1029/2001JD002002.
Hanson, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 956–957.
Hanson, J., M. Sato, and R. Rueby, 1997: Radiative forcing and climate response. J. Geophys Res., 102, 6831–6861.
Haywood, J., and O. Boucher, 2000: Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols. Rev. Geophys., 38, 513–543.
Haywood, J., P. N. Francis, and M. D. Glew, 2001: Optical properties and direct radiative effect of Sahara dust: A case study of two Sahara dust outbreaks using aircraft data. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 18417–18430.
Niu, S. J., C. C. Zhang, and J. M. Sun, 2001: The observational studies of size distribution of dust aerosols over Helan Mountain area. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 25, 243–252.
Sokolik, I. N., and G. Golitsyn, 1993: Radiative properties of atmospheric dust aerosols. Atmos. Environ., 27A(16), 2509–2517.
Sokolik, I. N., and O. B. Toon, 1996: Direct radiative forcing by anthropogenic airborne mineral aerosols. Nature, 381, 681–683.
Sokolik, I. N., and O. B. Toon, 1998: Modeling the radiative characteristics of airborne mineral aerosols at infrared wavelengths. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 8813–8826.
Sokolik, I. N., and Coauthors, 2001: Introduction to special section: Outstanding problems in quantifying the radiative impacts of mineral dust. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 18015–18028.
Shi Guangyu, 1998: The model of absorbing coefficient distribution in atmospheric radiation calculating. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 22, 659–676.
Takemura, T., T. Nakajima, O. Dubovik, B. Holben, and S. Kinne, 2002: Single-scattering albedo and radiative forcing of various aerosol species with a global three-dimensional model. J. Climate, 15(D4), 333–352.
Tegen, I., and I. Fung, 1996: The influence on climate forcing of mineral aerosols from disturbed soils. Nature, 380, 419–422.
WCP, 1983: WMO Report of the Experts Meeting on Aerosol and Their Climate Effects. Rep. WCP-55, A. Deepak and H.E. Gerber, eds., World Climate Program, Geneva.
Woodword, S., 2001: Modeling the atmospheric life cycle and radiative impact of mineral dust in the Hadley Centre climate model. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 18155–18166.
Yabuki, S. and Coauthors, 2002: Physical and chemical characteristics of aeolian dust collected over Asian dust source regions in China: Comparison with atmospheric aerosols in an urban area at Wako Japan. Journal of Arid Land Studies, 11, 273–289.
Zhang, H. and G. Y. Shi, 2002: Numerical explanation for accurate radiative cooling rates resulting from the correlated K-distribution hypothesis. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 74, 299–306.
Zhang Lisheng, and Shi Guangyu, 2001: The simulation and estimation of radiative properties and radiative forcing due to sulfate and soot aerosols. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 25(2), 231–242.
Zhang Xiaoye, and Coauthers, 1991: The studies of three dust storms in North and Northwest China. Chinese Science Bulliten, 19, 1487–1490.
Zhang, X. Y., S. L. Gong, T. L. Zhao, R. Arimoto, Y. Q. Wang, and Z. J. Zhou, 2003a: Sources of Asian dust and role of climate change versus desertification in Asian dust emission. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(24), 2272–2275.
Zhang, X. Y., and Coauthors, 2003b: Characterization of soil dust aerosol in China and its transport and distribution during 2001 ACEAsia: Network observations. J. Geophys. Res., 108(D9), doi: 10.1029/2002JD002632.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Shi, G., Li, S. et al. The impacts of optical properties on radiative forcing due to dust aerosol. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 23, 431–441 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-006-0431-5
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-006-0431-5