Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring forest soil properties with electrical resistivity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maintenance and monitoring of soil fertility is a key issue for sustainable forest management. Vital ecosystem processes may be affected by management practices which change the physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil. This study is the first in Europe to use electrical resistivity (ER) as a non-invasive method to rapidly determine forest soil properties in the field in a monitoring purpose. We explored the correlations between ER and forest soil properties on two permanent plots of the French long-term forest ecosystem-monitoring network (International Cooperative Program Forests, Level II). We used ER measurements to determine soil-sampling locations and define sampling design. Soil cores were taken in the A horizon and analysed for pH, bulk density, residual humidity, texture, organic matter content and nutrients. Our results showed high variability within the studied plots, both in ER and analysed soil properties. We found significant correlations between ER and soil properties, notably cation exchange capacity, soil humidity and texture, even though the magnitude of the correlations was modest. Despite these levels of correlations, we were able to assess variations in soil properties without having to chemically analyse numerous samples. The sampling design based on an ER survey allowed us to map basic soil properties with a small number of samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1999) Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests—second edition 1999. The Montréal Process, Canada

  • Arpin P, Ponge JF, Faille A, Blandin P (1998) Diversity and dynamics of eco-units in the biological reserves of the Fontainebleau forest (France): contribution of soil biology to a functional approach. Eur J Soil Biol 34:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg B (2000) Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soils. For Ecol Manag 133:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin DL, Lesch SM (2003) Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: theory, principles, and guidelines. Agron J 95:455–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin DL, Lesch SM (2005a) Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 46:11–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin DL, Lesch SM (2005b) Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity: part I. Survey protocols. Comput Electron Agric 46:103–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin DL, Lesch SM (2005c) Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity: part II. Case study. Comput Electron Agric 46:135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin DL, Lesch SM, Oster JD, Kaffka SR (2006) Monitoring management-induced spatio-temporal changes in soil quality through soil sampling directed by apparent electrical conductivity. Geoderma 131:369–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin DL, Lesch SM, Shouse PJ, Soppe R, Ayars JE (2003) Identifying soil properties that influence cotton yield using soil sampling directed by apparent soil electrical conductivity. Agron J 95:352–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Corwin DL, Plant RE (2005) Applications of apparent soil electrical conductivity in precision agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 46:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doelman P, Eijsackers HJP (eds) (2004) Vital soil—function, value and properties, developments in soil science, vol 29. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 340 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettema CH, Wardle DA (2002) Spatial soil ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 17:177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahani HJ, Buchleiter GW, Brodahl MK (2005) Characterization of apparent soil electrical conductivity variability in irrigated sandy and non-saline fields in Colorado. Trans ASAE 48:155–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fedotov GN, Tret'yakov YD, Pozdnayakov AI, Zhukov DV (2005) The role of organomineral gel in the origin of soil resistivity: concept and experiments. Eurasian Soil Sci 38:492–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman SP (2005) Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review. Comput Electron Agric 46:45–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources, 2nd edn. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103, FAO, Rome

  • Johnson CK, Eskridge KM, Corwin DL (2005) Apparent soil electrical conductivity: applications for designing and evaluating field-scale experiments. Comput Electron Agric 46:181–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaffka SR, Lesch SM, Bali KM, Corwin DL (2005) Site-specific management in salt-affected sugar beet fields using electromagnetic induction. Comput Electron Agric 46:329–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen NR, Sudduth KA, Myers DB, Drummond ST, Hong SY (2005) Delineating productivity zones on claypan soil fields using apparent soil electrical conductivity. Comput Electron Agric 46:285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesch SM (2005) Sensor-directed response surface sampling designs for characterizing spatial variation in soil properties. Comput Electron Agric 46:153–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesch S, Rhoades JD, Corwin DL (2000) ESAP-95 version 2.01R—user manual and tutorial guide. USDA-ARS, George E. Brown, Jr., Salinity Laboratory, Research Report No. 146, Riverside, CA, 169 pp

  • Lesch S, Rhoades JD, Corwin DL (2003) ESAP-95 version 2.30 software. Software installation directions and overview of new features. USDA-ARS, George E. Brown, Jr., Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA, 21 pp

  • Lesch SM, Corwin DL, Robinson DA (2005) Apparent soil electrical conductivity mapping as an agricultural management tool in arid zone soils. Comput Electron Agric 46:351–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michot D et al (2003) Spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content with an irrigated corn crop cover using surface electrical resistivity tomography. Water Resour Res 39:1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponette Q, Ulrich E, Brethes A, Bonneau M, Lanier M (1997) RENECOFOR—Chimie des sols dans les 102 peuplements du réseau. Office National des Forêts, Département des Recherches Techniques, 427 pp

  • Pozdnyakov AI, Pozdnyakova L (2002) Electrical fields and soil properties. Proceedings of the 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Thailand, 14–21 Aug 2002

  • Rhoades JD, Chanduvi F, Lesch S (1999) Soil salinity assessment: methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 57, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

  • Robain H, Descloitres M, Ritz M, Atangana QY (1996) A multiscale electrical survey of a lateritic soil system in the rain forest of Cameroon. J Appl Geophys 34:237–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samouelian A, Cousin I, Richard G, Tabbagh A, Bruand A (2003) Electrical resistivity imaging for detecting soil cracking at the centimetric scale. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1319–1326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samouelian A, Cousin I, Tabbagh A, Bruand A, Richard G (2005) Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil Tillage Res 83:173–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenholtz SH, Van Miegroet H, Burger JA (2000) A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. For Ecol Manag 138:335–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein A, Ettema C (2003) An overview of spatial sampling procedures and experimental design of spatial studies for ecosystem comparisons. Agric Ecosyst Environ 94:31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabbagh A, Dabas M, Hesse A, Panissod C (2000) Soil resistivity: a non-invasive tool to map soil structure horizonation. Geoderma 97:393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafilis J, Lesch SM (2005) Mapping clay content variation using electromagnetic induction techniques. Comput Electron Agric 46:203–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich E (1997) Organisation of the system monitoring in France: the RENECOFOR network. Proceedings of the XI World Forestry Conference. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Antalya, Turkey, 13–22 Oct 1997

  • Zhu J-J, Kang H-Z, Gonda Y (2007) Application of Wenner configuration to estimate soil water content in pine plantations on sandy land. Pedosphere 17:801–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to S. Lesch for his comments on a previous version of this paper. P. Nannipieri and two anonymous reviewers provided interesting comments on the manuscript. We also thank E. Mermin and L. Cecillon for their numerous contributions and E. Ulrich for his help concerning the RENECOFOR plots. Victoria Moore significantly helped us to polish the language. This research was funded by the European Union as a part of the European Research Program “Forest Focus”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoan Paillet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paillet, Y., Cassagne, N. & Brun, JJ. Monitoring forest soil properties with electrical resistivity. Biol Fertil Soils 46, 451–460 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0453-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0453-0

Keywords

Navigation