Skip to main content
Log in

Some Remarks on the Convexity Number of a Graph

  • Published:
Graphs and Combinatorics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Given a subgraph H in a graph G, we say H is convex if given any two vertices u and v in H, then H contains each shortest uv path in G. As defined in [5], [8] and other places the convexity number of G, denoted con(G), is the order of a largest convex proper subgraph of G. We note that if G is not a complete graph, then the clique number of G forms a lower bound on con(G). As we shall see, in many graphs the clique number and convexity number are equal. We exploit this equality to show that computation of con is NP-complete, provide a Nordhaus-Gaddum type bound for con and produce a Ramsey type theorem for con. We shall see the latter two problems are closely related to classical Ramsey theory. In doing so, we answer a problem posed by Chartrand and Zhang in [5].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Gimbel.

Additional information

Acknowledgments. Respectfully dedicated to Professor Edgar M. Palmer, on the happy occasion of his retirement from Michigan State University. Professor Palmer's kind generosity to his students, colleagues and family is deeply appreciated by many. Salmon beware!!!

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gimbel, J. Some Remarks on the Convexity Number of a Graph. Graphs and Combinatorics 19, 357–361 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-002-0518-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-002-0518-4

Keywords

Navigation