Skip to main content
Log in

Correcting outliers in GARCH models: a weighted forward approach

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we develop a weighted forward search (WFS) approach to the correction of outliers in GARCH(1,1) models relying on the foward search (FS) method introduced by Atkinson and Riani (Robust diagnostic regression analysis. Springer, New York, 2000). The WFS is based on a weighting system of each unit and is an extension of the FS from independent to dependent observations. We propose a WFS test for the detection of outliers in GARCH(1,1) models and a WFS estimator of GARCH(1,1) coefficients which automatically corrects outliers. Extensive Monte Carlo simulations show the good performance of the WFS test with respect to other methods of outlier detection for the same models. The marked similarity between the distribution of MLE before strong contamination of the time series and after decontamination through the WFS proves the reliability of the WFS estimator. Finally, the application of the WFS procedure to several financial time series of the NYSE reveals the effectiveness of the method when extreme returns are observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This point was suggested by a referee.

  2. We are very grateful to a referee who brought our attention to this point.

  3. In all simulations and applications (see Sect. 5) the distribution of the standardized squared residuals used to compute the unit weights has always been the \(\chi ^2_1\) (see Sect. 3.2 for details).

  4. Weekly frequency makes it possible to analyze long time periods with not too long time series. On the other hand, the presence of extreme returns is more probable than in the case of daily returns.

  5. The same plots are available for the remaining companies analyzed and can be obtained from the authors upon request.

Abbreviations

FS:

Forward search

WFS:

Weighted forward search

CDS:

Clean data set

References

  • Atkinson A, Riani M (2000) Robust diagnostic regression analysis. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AC (1994) Fast very robust methods for the detection of multiple outliers. J Am Stat Assoc 89(428):1329–1339

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bahamonde N, Veiga H (2016) A robust closed-form estimator for the garch(1,1) model. J Stat Comput Simul 86(8):1605–1619

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bali R, Guirguis H (2007) Extreme observations and non-normality in ARCH and GARCH. Int Rev Econ Financ 16(3):332–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilen C, Huzurbazar S (2002) Wavelet-based detection of outliers in time series. J Comput Gr Stat 11(2):311–327

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econ 31(3):307–327

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev T (1987) A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. Rev Econ Stat 69(3):542–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondon P, Bahamonde N (2012) Least squares estimation of ARCH models with missing observations. J Time Ser Anal 33(6):880–891

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carnero M, Peña D, Ruiz E (2007) Effects of outliers on the identification and estimation of GARCH models. J Time Ser Anal 28(4):471–497

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen K (2003) The finite-sample performance of robust unit root tests. Stat Pap 44(4):469

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Catalan B, Trivez FJ (2007) Forecasting volatility in GARCH models with additive outliers. Quant Financ 7(6):591–596

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cerioli A, Riani M (2002) Robust methods for the analysis of spatially autocorrelated data. Stat Methods Appl 11(3):335–358

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cerioli A, Farcomeni A, Riani M (2014) Strong consistency and robustness of the forward search estimator of multivariate location and scatter. J Multivar Anal 126:167–183

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Charles A (2008) Forecasting volatility with outliers in GARCH models. J Forecast 27(7):551–565

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Charles A, Darnè O (2005) Outliers and GARCH models in financial data. Econ Lett 86(3):347–352

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Liu LM (1993a) Forecasting time series with outliers. J Forecast 12(1):13–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Liu LM (1993b) Joint estimation of model parameters and outlier effects in time series. J Am Stat Assoc 88(421):284–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Doornik JA, Ooms M (2005) Outlier detection in GARCH models, economics papers 2005-W24. Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford

  • Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50(4):987–1007

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Franses PH, Ghijsels H (1999) Additive outliers, GARCH and forecasting volatility. Int J Forecast 15(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Franses PH, Van Dijk D (2000) Non-linear time series models in empirical finance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeano P, Tsay RS (2010) Shifts in individual parameters of a GARCH model. J Financ Econ 8(1):122–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez V, Maraval A, Peña D (1999) Missing observations in ARIMA models: skipping approach versus additive outlier approach. J Econom 88(2):341–363

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grané A, Veiga H (2010) Wavelet-based detection of outliers in financial time series. Comput Stat Data Anal 54(11):2580–2593

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grané A, Veiga H (2014) Outliers, GARCH-type models and risk measures: a comparison of several approaches. J Empir Financ 26:26–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossi L (2004) Analyzing financial time series through robust estimators. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econ 8(2), article 3

  • Grossi L, Laurini F (2009) A robust forward weighted Lagrange multiplier test for conditional heteroscedasticity. Comput Stat Data Anal 53(6):2251–2263

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hampel FR, Ronchetti EM, Rousseeuw PJ, Stahel WA (1986) Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heagerty PJ, Lumley T (2000) Window subsampling of estimating functions with application to regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 95(449):197–211

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JB (2015) Robust estimation and inference for heavy tailed GARCH. Bernoulli 21(3):1629–1669

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JB, Prokhorov A (2016) GEL estimation for heavy-tailed GARCH models with robust empirical likelihood inference. J Econom 190(1):18–45

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hotta LK, Tsay R (2012) Outliers in GARCH processes. In: Bell WR, Holan SH, McElroy T (eds) Economic time series: modeling and seasonality. Chapman and Hall, pp 337–358

  • Huber PJ, Ronchetti EM (2009) Robust statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert M, Rousseeuw PJ, Van Aelst S (2008) High-breakdown robust multivariate methods. Stat Sci 23(1):92–119

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang S, Pereira PLV (2006) Small sample properties of GARCH estimates and persistence. Eur J Financ 12(6–7):473–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent S, Lecourt C, Palm FC (2016) Testing for jumps in conditionally gaussian ARMA-GARCH models, a robust approach. Comput Stat Data Anal 100:383–400

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Ke R (2016) A generalized least squares estimation method for the autoregressive conditional duration model. Stat Pap 1–24

  • Maronna RA, Martin DR, Yohai VJ (2006) Robust statistics. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley

  • Mendes BVDM (2000) Assessing the bias of maximum likelihood estimates of contaminated GARCH models. J Stat Comput Simul 67(4):359–376

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Muler N, Yohai VJ (2008) Robust estimates for GARCH models. J Stat Plan Inference 138(10):2918–2940

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ossandón S, Bahamonde N (2011) On the nonlinear estimation of GARCH models using an extended Kalman filter. In: Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science. Proceedings of the world congress on engineering, WCE 2011, 6–8 July, 2011, London, UK, pp 148–151

  • Pelagatti M, Lisi F (2009) Variance initialisation in GARCH estimation. In: Complex data modeling and computationally intensive statistical methods for estimation and prediction, S.Co 2009, 14–16 September, 2009, Milan, Italy, Maggioli Editore, pp 323–328

  • Penzer J (2007) Inference for GARCH and related models with incomplete data, Working Paper, LSE

  • Proietti T (2008) Missing data in time series: a note on the equivalence of the dummy variable and the skipping approaches. Stat Probab Lett 78(3):257–264

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Riani M (2004) Extensions of the forward search to time series. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econom 8(2), article 2

  • Riani M, Cerioli A, Atkinson AC, Perrotta D (2014) Monitoring robust regression. Electron J Stat 8(1):646–677

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Riani M, Perrotta D, Cerioli A (2015) The forward search for very large datasets. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelant E, Van Aelst S, Willems G (2009) The minimum weighted covariance determinant estimator. Metrika 70(2):177

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw P, Leroy A (1987) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sakata S, White H (1998) High breakdown point conditional dispersion estimation with application to S&P 500 daily returns volatility. Econometrica 66(3):529–567

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salini S, Cerioli A, Laurini F, Riani M (2016) Reliable robust regression diagnostics. Int Stat Rev 84(1):99–127

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk D, Franses PH, Lucas A (1999) Testing for ARCH in the presence of additive outliers. J Appl Econom 14(5):539–562

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to two anonymous referees and the Editor who gave valuable suggestions to improve the paper. They also wish to thank all the participants at the final conference of Project MIUR (2012) in Benevento, at Sco Meeting (2013) in Milan, and at the meeting on Robust Statistics at the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission in Ispra (2014) where preliminary versions of the present work were presented. All comments and suggestions have been considered and have contributed to improve the quality of the manuscript. We thank Matteo M. Pelagatti for the use of his R-codes for GARCH estimation. This work was supported by the project MIUR 2012-MISURA and by the Department of Economics (University of Verona), Grant FAR/2015. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Grossi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crosato, L., Grossi, L. Correcting outliers in GARCH models: a weighted forward approach. Stat Papers 60, 1939–1970 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-017-0903-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-017-0903-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation