Skip to main content
Log in

Brain structure differences between solitary and social wasp species are independent of body size allometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolutionary transitions in social behavior are often associated with changes in species’ brain architecture. A recent comparative analysis showed that the structure of brains of wasps in the family Vespidae differed between solitary and social species: the mushroom bodies, a major integrative brain region, were larger relative to brain size in the solitary species. However, the earlier study did not account for body size effects, and species’ relative mushroom body size increases with body size in social Vespidae. Here we extend the previous analysis by measuring the effects of body size variation on brain structure differences between social and solitary vespid wasps. We asked whether total brain volume was greater relative to body size in the solitary species, and whether relative mushroom body size was greater in solitary species, after accounting for body size effects. Both total brain volume and relative mushroom body volume were significantly greater in the solitary species after accounting for body size differences. Therefore, body size allometry did not explain the solitary versus social species differences in brain structure. The evolutionary transition from solitary to social behavior in Vespidae was accompanied by decreases in total brain size and in relative mushroom body size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergman TJ, Beehner JC (2015) Measuring social complexity. Anim Behav 103:203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary R, Gingins S, Vail AL (2014) Social cognition in fishes. Trends Cogn Sci 18:465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burish MJ, Kueh HY, Wang SSH (2004) Brain architecture and social complexity in modern and ancient birds. Brain Behav Evol 63:107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danforth BN (2002) Evolution of sociality in a primitively eusocial lineage of bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:286–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeCasien AR, Williams SA, Higham JP (2017) Primate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality. Nat Ecol Evol 1:0112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar RI, Shultz S (2007) Evolution in the social brain. Science 317:1344–1347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrbach SE (2006) Structure of the mushroom bodies of the insect brain. Annu Rev Entomol 51:209–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farris SM (2016) Insect societies and the social brain. Curr Opin Insect Sci 15:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris SM, Van Dyke JW (2015) Evolution and function of the insect mushroom bodies: contributions from comparative and model systems studies. Curr Opin Insect Sci 12:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris SM, Robinson GE, Fahrbach SE (2001) Experience- and age-related outgrowth of intrinsic neurons in the mushroom bodies of the adult worker honeybee. J Neurosci 21:6395–6404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay BL, Darlington RB, Nicastro N (2001) Developmental structure in brain evolution. Behav Brain Sci 24:263–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gronenberg W, Riveros AJ (2009) Social brains and behavior—past and present. In: Gadau J, Fewell J (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 377–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager R, Lu L, Rosen GD, Williams RW (2012) Genetic architecture supports mosaic brain evolution and independent brain–body size regulation. Nat Commun 3:1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines HM, Hunt JH, O’Connor TK, Gillespie JJ, Cameron SA (2007) Multigene phylogeny reveals eusociality evolved twice in vespid wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:3295–3299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isler K, Van Schaik CP (2006) Metabolic costs of brain size evolution. Biol Lett 2:557–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isler K, Van Schaik CP (2009) The expensive brain: a framework for explaining evolutionary changes in brain size. J Hum Evol 57:392–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TA, Donlan NA, O’Donnell S (2009) Growth and pruning of mushroom body Kenyon cell dendrites during worker behavioral development in the paper wasp, Polybia aequatorialis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Neurobiol Learn Mem 92:485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating-Godfrey R, Wulfila Gronenberg W (2019) Brain evolution in social insects: advocating for the comparative approach. J Comp Physiol A 205:13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotrschal A, Rogell B, Bundsen A, Svensson B, Zajitschek S, Brännström I, Immler S, Maklakov AA, Kolm N (2013) Artificial selection on relative brain size in the guppy reveals costs and benefits of evolving a larger brain. Curr Biol 23:168–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kverková K, Bělíková T, Olkowicz S, Pavelková Z, O’Riain MJ, Šumbera R, Burda H, Bennett NC, Němec P (2018) Sociality does not drive the evolution of large brains in eusocial African mole-rats. Sci Rep 8:9203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lihoreau M, Latty T, Chittka L (2012) An exploration of the social brain hypothesis in insects. Front Physiol 3:442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven JE, Laughlin SB (2008) Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems. J Exp Biol 211:1792–1804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell S, Bulova SJ (2017) Development and evolution of brain allometry in wasps (Vespidae): size, ecology and sociality. Curr Opin Insect Sci 22:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell S, Bulova SJ, DeLeon S, Khodak P, Miller S, Sulger E (2015) Distributed cognition and social brains: reductions in mushroom body investment accompanied the origins of sociality in wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Proc R Soc B 282:20150791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell S, Bulova SJ, Barrett M, Fiocca K (2018) Size constraints and sensory adaptations affect mosaic brain evolution (paper wasps—Vespidae: Epiponini). Biol J Linn Soc 123:302–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Barberıa FJ, Shultz S, Dunbar RIM (2007) Evidence for coevolution of sociality and relative brain size in three orders of mammals. Evolution 61:2811–2821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piekarski PK, Carpenter JM, Lemmon AR, Moriarty Lemmon E, Sharanowski BJ, Crandall K (2018) Phylogenomic evidence overturns current conceptions of social evolution in wasps (Vespidae). Mol Biol Evol 35:2097–2109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reader SM, Laland KN (2002) Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:4436–4441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turillazzi S (2012) The biology of hover wasps. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW (2008) Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and character evolution. Bioinformatics 24:2098–2100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West RJ (2014) The evolution of large brain size in birds is related to social, not genetic, monogamy. Biol J Linn Soc 111:668–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (2005) Behavior of the primitively social wasp Montezumia cortesioides Willink (Vespidae Eumeninae) and the origins of vespid sociality. Ethol Ecol Evol 17:201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO, Hölldobler B (2005) Eusociality: origin and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:13367–13371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zars T (2000) Behavioral functions of the insect mushroom bodies. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:790–795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research was funded by NSF Grant 1209072, a Wistar Morris grant, and the College of Arts and Sciences of Drexel University (to S. O’D.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean O’Donnell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Donnell, S., Bulova, S., DeLeon, S. et al. Brain structure differences between solitary and social wasp species are independent of body size allometry. J Comp Physiol A 205, 911–916 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-019-01374-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-019-01374-w

Keywords

Navigation