Abstract
The main sound localisation cues in the horizontal plane are interaural time and level differences (ITDs and ILDs, respectively). ITDs are thought to be the dominant cue in the low-frequency range, ILDs the dominant cue in the high-frequency range. ITDs and ILDs co-occur. Their interaction and contribution to the lateralisation of pure tones by Mongolian gerbils was investigated behaviourally using cross-talk cancellation techniques for presenting ITDs and ILDs independently. First, ITDs were applied to pure tones with frequencies ≤ 2 kHz to the ongoing waveform, at the onsets and offsets, or in both the ongoing waveform and at the onsets and offsets. Gerbils could lateralise tones only if ongoing ITDs were present indicating that ongoing ITDs are decisive for the lateralisation of low-frequency tones. Second, an ITD was added to 2-to-6-kHz tones with varying ILD. Gerbils’ lateralisation was unaffected by the ITD indicating that a large ILD provides a strong lateralisation cue at those frequencies. Finally, small ILDs were applied to 2-kHz tones with an ongoing ITD, pointing either to the same or opposing sides as the ITD. Gerbils’ lateralisation was driven by the ITD but strongly affected by the ILD indicating that both interaural cues contribute to the lateralisation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann CF, Terada S, Kashino M, Goto K, Mima T, Fukuyama H, Furukawa S (2014) Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex? Hear Res 312:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.03.009
Altmann CF, Ueda R, Furukawa S, Kashino M, Mima T, Fukuyama H (2017) Auditory mismatch negativity in response to changes of counter-balanced interaural time and level differences. Front Neurosci 11:387. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00387
Benichoux V, Rébillat M, Brette R (2016) On the variation of interaural time differences with frequency. J Acoust Soc Am 139:1810. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4944638
Buell TN, Trahiotis C, Bernstein LR (1991) Lateralization of low-frequency tones: relative potency of gating and ongoing interaural delays. J Acoust Soc Am 90:3077–3085. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.401782
Damaske P (1971) Head-related two-channel stereophony with loudspeaker reproduction. J Acoust Soc Am 50:1109. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912742
Diedesch AC, Stecker GC (2015) Temporal weighting of binaural information at low frequencies: discrimination of dynamic interaural time and level differences. J Acoust Soc Am 138:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4922327
Dietz M, Ewert SD, Hohmann V (2009) Lateralization of stimuli with independent fine-structure and envelope-based temporal disparities. J Acoust Soc Am 125:1622–1635. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3076045
Dietz M, Marquardt T, Salminen NH, McAlpine D (2013) Emphasis of spatial cues in the temporal fine structure during the rising segments of amplitude-modulated sounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:15151–15156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309712110
Feinkohl A, Borzeszkowski KM, Klump GM (2016) Azimuthal sound localization in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): III. Comparison of sound localization measures. Hear Res 332:238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.001
Furukawa S (2008) Detection of combined changes in interaural time and intensity differences: segregated mechanisms in cue type and in operating frequency range? J Acoust Soc Am 123:1602–1617. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2835226
Gaik W (1993) Combined evaluation of interaural time and intensity differences: psychoacoustic results and computer modeling. J Acoust Soc Am 94:98–110. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406947
Green DM, Swets JA (2000) Signal detection theory and psychophysics, Repr. ed. Peninsula Publ, Los Altos Hills
Greene NT, Anbuhl KL, Williams W, Tollin DJ (2014) The acoustical cues to sound location in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Hear Res 316:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.07.004
Grothe B, Pecka M, McAlpine D (2010) Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals. Physiol Rev 90:983–1012. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00026.2009
Hafter ER, Jeffress LA (1968) Two-image lateralization of tones and clicks. J Acoust Soc Am 44:563–569. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1911121
Hafter ER, Dye RH, Gilkey RH (1979) Lateralization of tonal signals which have neither onsets nor offsets. J Acoust Soc Am 65:471–477. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.382346
Hartmann WM, Rakerd B, Crawford ZD, Zhang PX (2016) Transaural experiments and a revised duplex theory for the localization of low-frequency tones. J Acoust Soc Am 139:968–985. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4941915
Hsieh I-H, Petrosyan A, Gonçalves ÓF, Hickok G, Saberi K (2011) Observer weighting of interaural cues in positive and negative envelope slopes of amplitude-modulated waveforms. Hear Res 277:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.008
Irvine DR (1987) Interaural intensity differences in the cat: changes in sound pressure level at the two ears associated with azimuthal displacements in the frontal horizontal plane. Hear Res 26:267–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(87)90063-3
Jeffress LA, McFadden D (1971) Differences of interaural phase and level in detection and lateralization. J Acoust Soc Am 49:1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912479
Keating P, Nodal FR, King AJ (2014) Behavioural sensitivity to binaural spatial cues in ferrets: evidence for plasticity in the duplex theory of sound localization. Eur J Neurosci 39:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12402
Kettler L, Griebel H, Ferger R, Wagner H (2017) Combination of interaural level and time difference in azimuthal sound localization in owls. eNeuro 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0238-17.2017
Klein-Hennig M, Dietz M, Hohmann V, Ewert SD (2011) The influence of different segments of the ongoing envelope on sensitivity to interaural time delays. J Acoust Soc Am 129:3856–3872. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3585847
Koehnke J, Colburn HS, Durlach NI (1986) Performance in several binaural-interaction experiments. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1558–1562. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.393682
Kuhn GF (1977) Model for the interaural time differences in the azimuthal plane. J Acoust Soc Am 62:157–167. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381498
Lang A-G, Buchner A (2008) Relative influence of interaural time and intensity differences on lateralization is modulated by attention to one or the other cue. J Acoust Soc Am 124:3120–3131. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2981041
Lang A-G, Buchner A (2009) Relative influence of interaural time and intensity differences on lateralization is modulated by attention to one or the other cue: 500-Hz sine tones. J Acoust Soc Am 126:2536–2542. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3212927
Macpherson EA, Middlebrooks JC (2002) Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. J Acoust Soc Am 111:2219–2236. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1471898
Maki K, Furukawa S (2005) Acoustical cues for sound localization by the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. J Acoust Soc Am 118:872–886. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1944647
McFadden D, Jeffress LA, Russell WE (1973) Individual differences in sensitivity to interaural differences in time and level. Percept Mot Skills 37:755–761. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1973.37.3.755
Ochi A, Yamasoba T, Furukawa S (2014) Factors that account for inter-individual variability of lateralization performance revealed by correlations of performance among multiple psychoacoustical tasks. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00027
Palmer AR, Russell IJ (1986) Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells. Hear Res 24:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(86)90002-X
Schroger E (1996) Interaural time and level differences: integrated or separated processing? Hear Res 96:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(96)00066-4
Shaw EAG (1974) Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. J Acoust Soc Am 56:1848–1861. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1903522
Stecker GC, Bibee JM (2014) Nonuniform temporal weighting of interaural time differences in 500 Hz tones. J Acoust Soc Am 135:3541–3547. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4876179
Stecker GC, Brown AD (2010) Temporal weighting of binaural cues revealed by detection of dynamic interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains. J Acoust Soc Am 127:3092–3103. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3377088
Sumner CJ, Palmer AR (2012) Auditory nerve fibre responses in the ferret. Eur J Neurosci 36:2428–2439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08151.x
Tobias JV, Schubert ED (1959) Effective onset duration of auditory stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 31:1595–1605. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907665
Tolnai S, Dolležal L-V, Klump GM (2015) Binaural cues provide for a release from informational masking. Behav Neurosci 129:589–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000091
Tolnai S, Beutelmann R, Klump GM (2017) Exploring binaural hearing in gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) using virtual headphones. PLoS One 12:e0175142. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175142
Versteegh CPC, Meenderink SWF, van der Heijden M (2011) Response characteristics in the apex of the Gerbil cochlea studied through auditory nerve recordings. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:301–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-010-0255-y
Whitworth RH, Jeffress LA (1961) Time vs intensity in the localization of tones. J Acoust Soc Am 33:925. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908849
Wightman FL, Kistler DJ (1992) The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. J Acoust Soc Am 91:1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402445
Yost WA (1977) Lateralization of pulsed sinusoids based on interaural onset, ongoing, and offset temporal differences. J Acoust Soc Am 61:190–194. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381254
Yost WA (1981) Lateral position of sinusoids presented with interaural intensive and temporal differences. J Acoust Soc Am 70:397. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.386775
Zurek PM (1993) A note on onset effects in binaural hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 93:1200–1201. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.405516
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB/TRR31 and EXC1077). We wish to thank Linda Arfmann, Jérémy Giroud, and Lisa Kraus for their contribution to data collection and excellent care of the animals during the time of data collection. Jérémy Giroud was supported by the A*MIDEX Grant (no. ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02) funded by the French Government «Investissements d’Avenir» programme. We also wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: ST, RB, GMK. Formal analysis: ST. Funding acquisition: GMK. Investigation: ST. Methodology: ST, RB, GMK. Project administration: ST, GMK. Resources: GMK. Software: ST, RB. Supervision: ST, GMK. Visualisation: ST. Writing—original draft preparation: ST. Writing—review and editing: ST, RB, GMK.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in the study involving the animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Oldenburg and approved by the Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LAVES), Lower Saxony, Germany.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tolnai, S., Beutelmann, R. & Klump, G.M. Interaction of interaural cues and their contribution to the lateralisation of Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). J Comp Physiol A 204, 435–448 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-018-1253-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-018-1253-5