Abstract
Equality of opportunity is an ethical goal with almost universal appeal. The interpretation taken here is that a society has achieved equality of opportunity if it is the case that what individuals accomplish, with respect to some desirable objective, is determined wholly by their choices and personal effort, rather than by circumstances beyond their control. We use data for Swedish men born between 1955 and 1967 for whom we measure the distribution of long-run income, as well as several important background circumstances, such as parental education and income, family structure and own IQ before adulthood. We address the question: in Sweden, given its present constellation of social policies and institutions, to what extent is existing income inequality due to circumstances, as opposed to ‘effort’? Our results suggest that several circumstances, importantly both parental income and own IQ, are important for long-run income inequality, but that variations in individual effort account for the most part of that inequality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arneson RJ (1989) Equality and equality of opportunity for welfare. Philos Stud 56: 77–93
Betts JR, Roemer JE (2007) Equalizing opportunity for racial and socioeconomic groups in the United States through educational finance reform. In: Woessmann L, Peterson PE (eds) Schools and the equal opportunity problem, chapter 9. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 209–238
Bingley P., Corak M, Westergrd-Nielsen N (2010a) Families, firms, and labour market inequalities: the long run consequences of the intergenerational transmission of employers in Canada and Denmark. In: Ermisch J, Jäntti M, Smeeding T (eds) Inequality from childhood to adulthood: a cross-national perspective on the transmission of advantage. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Björklund A, Jäntti M, Solon G (2007) Nature and nurture in the intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic status: evidence from Swedish children and their biological and rearing parents. B.E. J Econ Anal Policy 7(2(Advances)), Article 4. http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/vol7/iss2/art4
Björklund A, Jäntti M, Lindquist MJ (2009) Family background and income during the rise of the welfare state: Brother correlations in income for Swedish men born 1932–1968. J Public Econ 93(5–6): 671–680. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.02.006
Björklund A, Eriksson HK, Jäntti M (2010b) IQ and family background: are associations strong or weak? B.E. J Econ Anal Policy 10(1), (Contributions) Article 1. doi:10.2202/1935-1682.2349. http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/vol10/iss1/art2
Björklund A, Roine J, Waldenström D (2010c) Intergenerational top income mobility in Sweden: capitalist dynasties in the land of equal opportunity? Working Paper 9/2010, Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University
Bourguignon F, Ferreira FH (2007) Inequality of opportunity in Brazil. Rev Income Wealth 53(4): 585–618
Böhlmark A, Lindquist MJ (2006) Life-cycle variations in the association between current and lifetime income: replication and extension for Sweden. J Labor Econ 24(4): 879–896
Bratsberg B, Røed K, Raaum O, Naylor R, Jäntti M, Eriksson T, Österbacka E (2007) Nonlinearities in intergenerational earnings mobility: consequences for cross-country comparisons. Econ J 117(519): C72–C92
Carlstedt B (2000) Cognitive abilities: Aspects of structure, process and measurement. PhD thesis, Gothenburg University
Cesarini D (2009) Family influences on productive skills, human capital and lifecycle income. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Checchi D, Peragine V (2010) Inequality of opportunity in Italy. J Econ Inequal 8(4): 429–450
Cohen GA (1989) On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99(4): 906–944
Corak M, Piraino P (2011) The intergenerational transmission of employers and earnings. J Labor Econ 29(1): 37–68
de Barros RP, Ferreira FHG, Vega JM, Chanduri JS (2009) Measuring inequalities of opportunities in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank, Washington, DC
Dworkin R (1981) What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philos Public Aff 10(4): 283–345
Fleurbaey M (2008) Fairness, responsibility, and welfare. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5(3): 299–314
Keane MP, Roemer JE (2009) Assessing policies to equalize opportunity using an equilibrium model of educational and occupational choices. J Public Econ 93(7-8): 879–898. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.04.002
Lee W (2008) Empirical estimation of the share of observed income inequality due to unequal circumstance (memo to authors)
Lefranc A, Pistolesi N, Trannoy A (2009) Equality of opportunity and luck: definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in France. J Public Econ 93(11–12): 1189–1207
Mårdberg B, Carlstedt B (1998) Swedish enlistment battery (SEB): construct validity and latent variable estimation of cognitive abilities by the CAT-SEB. Int J Sel Assess 6(2): 107–114
Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state, Utopia. Basic Books, New York
O’Neill D, Sweetman O, Vande Gaer D (2000) Equality of opportunity and kernel density estimation: an application to intergenerational mobility. Adv Econom 14: 259–274
Roemer JE (1993) A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philos Public Aff 22(2): 146–166
Roemer JE (1998) Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press, New York
Roemer JE (2004) Equal opportunity and intergenerational mobility: going beyond intergenerational transition matrices. In: Corak M (eds) Generational income mobility in North America and Europe, Chapter 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 48–57
Shorrocks AF (1999) Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: a unified framework based on the Shapley value. Unpublished manuscript. University of Essex and Institute for Fiscal Studies
Solon G (1999) Intergenerational mobility in the labor market. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, volume 3. Elsevier Science BV, New York, pp 1761–1800
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Björklund, A., Jäntti, M. & Roemer, J.E. Equality of opportunity and the distribution of long-run income in Sweden. Soc Choice Welf 39, 675–696 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0609-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0609-3