Skip to main content
Log in

Diaphragmless shock tube with multiple air-operated valves

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a novel diaphragmless shock tube driven by a driver valve system consisting of multiple air-operated valves was developed. The novel shock tube can generate shock waves with high repeatability, which are required for statistical investigations of shock waves. The main valve of the driver valve system is opened by decompressing the air in the sub-high-pressure room behind the main valve using “sub-valves”; this results in a shock wave formation inside the shock tube. Three different driver valves (driver valve with “a single solenoid sub-valve,” “a single air-operated sub valve,” and “three air-operated sub-valves”) were developed. For each of the three driver valves, the overpressure waveforms of the shock waves were measured with pressure sensors installed on the inner wall of the shock tube and in front of the open end of the shock tube. Furthermore, the shock Mach number was calculated from the overpressure behind the shock waves. The shock Mach number was the largest for the driver valve with the air-operated sub-valve(s). The standard deviation of the peak overpressure fluctuations of the shock waves ejected from the open end of the shock tube was the smallest for the driver valve with the three air-operated sub valves. From the results, it was observed that the quick opening time of the main valve realized by the multiple sub-valves increased the shock wave strength and improved the repeatability of the shock wave generation.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agui JH, Briassulis G, Andreopoulos Y (2005) Studies of interactions of a propagating shock wave with decaying grid turbulence: velocity and vorticity fields. J Fluid Mech 524:143–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aruga K, Inokuma K, Watanabe T, Nagata K, Sakai Y (2020) Experimental investigation of interactions between turbulent cylinder wake and spherical shock wave. Phys Fluids 32(1):016101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolling DS (2001) Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: what next? AIAA J 39(8):1517–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey MS, Cloete TJ, Yates ADB (2011) A rapid opening sleeve valve for a diaphragmless shock tube. Shock Waves 21(4):315–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima G, Tamba T, Iwakawa A, Sasoh A (2020) Influence of cellophane diaphragm rupture processes on the shock wave formation in a shock tube. Shock Waves 30(5):545–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller ME, Skowron M, Tranter RS, Goldsmith CF (2019) A modular, multi-diagnostic, automated shock tube for gas-phase chemistry. Rev Sci Instrum 90(6):064104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hariharan MS, Janardhanraj S, Saravanan S, Jagadeesh G (2011) Diaphragmless shock wave generators for industrial applications of shock waves. Shock Waves 21(3):301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini SHR, Takayama K (2010) Experimental study of toroidal shock wave focusing in a compact vertical annular diaphragmless shock tube. Shock Waves 20(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini SHR, Onodera O, Takayama K (2000) Characteristics of an annular vertical diaphragmless shock tube. Shock Waves 10(3):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inokuma K, Watanabe T, Nagata K, Sasoh A, Sakai Y (2017) Finite response time of shock wave modulation by turbulence. Phys Fluids 29(5):051701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inokuma K, Watanabe T, Nagata K, Sakai Y (2019) Statistical properties of spherical shock waves propagating through grid turbulence, turbulent cylinder wake, and laminar flow. Phys Scr 94:044004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inokuma K, Watanabe T, Nagata K, Sakai Y (2019) Statistics of overpressure fluctuations behind a weak shock wave interacting with turbulence. Phys Fluids 31(8):085119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inokuma K, Watanabe T, Nagata K, Sakai Y (2021) Experimental study of shock wave modulation caused by velocity and temperature fluctuations in cylinder wakes. Phys Rev Fluids 6(6):063401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janardhanraj S, Karthick SK, Cohen J, Farooq A (2021) A review of diaphragmless shock tubes for interdisciplinary applications. http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.02679

  • Kim JH, Sasoh A, Matsuda A (2010) Modulations of a weak shock wave through a turbulent slit jet. Shock Waves 20(4):339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura T, Nagata K, Sakai Y, Sasoh A, Ito Y (2017) Changes in divergence-free grid turbulence interacting with a weak spherical shock wave. Phys Fluids 29(6):065114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau LD (1945) On shock waves at large distances from the place of their origin. J Phys USSR 9(6):496–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkens B, Blackstock DT (1998) Model experiment to study sonic boom propagation through turbulence. part i: General results. J Acoust Soc Am 103(1):148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Low MM, Klessen RS (2004) Control of star formation by supersonic turbulence. Rev Mod Phys 76(1):125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglieri DJ (1966) Some effects of airplane operations and the atmosphere on sonic-boom signatures. J Acoust Soc Am 39:S36–S42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejia-Alvarez R, Wilson B, Leftwich MC, Martinez AA, Prestridge KP (2015) Design of a fast diaphragmless shock tube driver. Shock Waves 25(6):635–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham CE (2010) Blast waves, vol 402. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Samimi MA, Zamani J, Sardarzadeh F (2021) Shock wave pressure and velocity measuring using a novel optic sensor in a newly designed diaphragm-less shock tube. Exp Tech 45(1):55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasoh A, Harasaki T, Kitamura T, Takagi D, Ito S, Matsuda A, Nagata K, Sakai Y (2014) Statistical behavior of post-shock overpressure past grid turbulence. Shock Waves 24(5):489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svete A, Kutin J (2020) Characterization of a newly developed diaphragmless shock tube for the primary dynamic calibration of pressure meters. Metrologia 57(5):055009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svete A, Kutin J (2022) Identifying the high-frequency response of a piezoelectric pressure measurement system using a shock tube primary method. Mech Syst Signal Process 162:108014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svete A, Hernández Castro FJ, Kutin J (2022) Effect of the dynamic response of a side-wall pressure measurement system on determining the pressure step signal in a shock tube using a time-of-flight method. Sensors 22(6):2103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swietek B, Skotak M, Chandra N, Pfister BJ (2019) Characterization of a controlled shock wave delivered by a pneumatic table-top gas driven shock tube. Rev Sci Instrum 90(7):075116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi M, Kashitani M, Nishiyama M (2018) Fundamental study on operational conditions of diaphragmless shock tube driven by pneumatic piston. Int J Mech Eng Rob Res 7(6):649–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano Y, Akamatsu T (1984) A diaphragmless shock tube. J Phys E: Sci Instrum 17(8):644–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamba T, Fukushima G, Kayumi M, Iwakawa A, Sasoh A (2019) Experimental investigation of the interaction of a weak planar shock with grid turbulence in a counter-driver shock tube. Phys Rev Fluids 4(7):073401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas VA, Kares RJ (2012) Drive asymmetry and the origin of turbulence in an ICF implosion. Phys Rev Lett 109(7):075004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranter RS, Lynch PT (2013) A miniature high repetition rate shock tube. Rev Sci Instrum 84(9):094102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranter RS, Sikes T (2020) Solenoid actuated driver valve for high repetition rate shock tubes. Rev Sci Instrum 91(5):056101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udagawa S, Maeno K, Golubeva I, Garen W (2009) Interferometric signal measurement of shock waves and contact surfaces in small scale shock tube. shock waves. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Profs. A. Sasoh, Y. Sakai, A. Murata, and K. Mori for their help and valuable comments to this work. Part of this work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 22K14419, 21H04589, and 18K13682.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kento Inokuma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inokuma, K., Maeda, T., Watanabe, T. et al. Diaphragmless shock tube with multiple air-operated valves. Exp Fluids 63, 121 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03473-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03473-y

Navigation