Abstract
The mean and turbulent flow fields were measured upstream, within, and downstream of a non-resonating shallow wall cavity subject to low Mach number flows with both laminar and turbulent upstream boundary layers. The laminar case displayed a cavity vortex that was stronger and more localized towards the trailing edge compared to the turbulent case with the same freestream velocity. The location of the maximum Reynolds shear stress in the shear layer rises slightly above the cavity mouth near the cavity centerline for the laminar case in contrast to the turbulent case, where it remains near or slightly below the cavity mouth across the entire cavity. Downstream of the cavity, the laminar and turbulent cases converged towards a common turbulent boundary layer. The non-resonating condition of the cavity was explored through comparisons with resonance criteria from previous experimental investigations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- D :
-
Depth of cavity
- L :
-
Length of cavity in streamwise direction
- M :
-
Mach number
- Re :
-
Reynolds number based on U and L
- Re δ :
-
Reynolds number based on U and δ
- St :
-
Strouhal number based on frequency, L, and U
- U :
-
Velocity of freestream (streamwise) flow
- W :
-
Width of cavity
- x, y, z :
-
Coordinates in streamwise, cavity depth, and cavity width directions
- u :
-
Velocity in streamwise direction
- v :
-
Velocity normal to streamwise direction (in cavity depth direction)
- \(\langle {u}\ifmmode{'}\else$'$\fi{v}\ifmmode{'}\else$'$\fi\rangle \) :
-
Reynolds shear stress
- \(\langle \rangle \) :
-
Average of the quantity
- δ :
-
Boundary layer thickness immediately upstream of the cavity opening
- δ*:
-
Boundary layer displacement thickness immediately upstream of the cavity opening
- ε t :
-
Eddy viscosity
- θ :
-
Boundary layer momentum thickness immediately upstream of the cavity opening
- ω :
-
Vorticity
References
Ahuja KK, Mendoza J (1995) Effects of cavity dimensions, boundary layer, and temperature on cavity noise with emphasis on benchmark data to validate computational aeroacoustic codes. NASA contractor report: final report contract NAS1–19061, task 13
Block PJW (1976) Noise response of cavities of varying dimensions at subsonic speeds. NASA TN D-8351
Charwat AF, Roos JN, Dewey FC, Hitz J (1961) An investigation of separated flows. Part 1: The pressure field. J Aerosp Sci 28:457–470
Compton DA, Eaton JK (1996) A high resolution laser Doppler anemometer for three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids 22:111–117. DOI 10.1007/s003480050028
DeMetz FC, Farabee TM (1977) Laminar and turbulent shear flow induced cavity resonances. AIAA paper 77–1293
Dewar WG (2002) Experimental investigation of the flow characteristics within a shallow wall cavity for both laminar and turbulent upstream boundary layers. PhD thesis, Boston University
Dix RE, Bauer RC (2000) Experimental and predicted acoustic amplitudes in a rectangular cavity. AIAA paper 2000–0472
East LF (1966) Aerodynamic induced resonance in rectangular cavities. J Sound Vib 3:277–287
Elder SA, Farabee TM, DeMetz FC (1982) Mechanisms of flow-excited cavity tones at low mach number. J Acoust Soc Am 72(2):532–549
Gharib M, Roshko A (1987) The effect of flow oscillations on cavity drag. J Fluid Mech 177:501–530
Lin JC, Rockwell D (2001) Organized oscillations of initially turbulent flow past a cavity. AIAA J 39(6):1139–1151
Neary MD, Stephanoff KD (1987) Shear-layer-driven transition in a rectangular cavity. Phys Fluids 30(10):2936–2946
Pereira JCF, Sousa JJMM (1994) Influence of impingement edge geometry on cavity flow oscillations. AIAA J 32(8):1737–1740
Plentovich E (1992) Three-dimensional cavity flow fields at subsonic and transonic speeds. Technical report TM-4209, NASA Langley Research Center
Raman G, Envia E, Bencic TJ (1998) Tone noise and nearfield pressure produced by jet-cavity interaction. Technical report TM-1998–208836, AIAA paper 99–0604, NASA Lewis Research Center
Rockwell D, Knisely C (1979) Unsteady features of flow past a cavity. J Hydr Eng Div-ASCE 105(HY8): 969–979
Rockwell D, Naudascher E (1979) Self-sustained oscillations of impinging free shear layers. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 11:67–94
Rossiter JE (1966) Wind-tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds. Technical reports. Reports and memo no 3438, Aeronautical Research Council
Sarohia V (1977) Experimental investigation of oscillations in flows over shallow cavities. AIAA J 15(7):984–991
Srinivasan S, Baysal O (1991) Navier-Stokes calculations of transonic flow past cavities. J Fluid Eng-T ASME 113:369–376
Tam CKW, Block PJW (1978) On the tones and pressure oscillations induced by flow over rectangular cavities. J Fluid Mech 89(2):373–399
Tracy MB, Plentovich E (1992) Measurements of fluctuating pressure in a rectangular cavity in transonic flow at high Reynolds numbers. Technical report TM-4363, NASA Langley Research Center
Xie Q (1996) Periodic unsteady effects on turbulent boundary layer transport and heat transfer: An experimental Investigation In a cylinder-wall junction flow. PhD thesis, Boston University
Zoccola PJ Jr (2000) Experimental investigation of flow-induced cavity resonance. PhD thesis, The Catholic University of America, Washington
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at Boston University for its financial support of this project. The experimental measurements were possible due to the efforts of Debora Compton and her graduate student John Stadnicki. Joe Estano is recognized for his help in producing the cavity models. Finally, Ted Farabee’s willingness to share his experienced insights into the cavity flow problem was greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
M. Grace, S., Dewar, W.G. & E. Wroblewski, D. Experimental investigation of the flow characteristics within a shallow wall cavity for both laminar and turbulent upstream boundary layers. Exp Fluids 36, 791–804 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0761-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0761-3