Skip to main content
Log in

Originalpräparat versus Generika – Latanoprost

Wie gleich ist unterschiedlich?

Original preparations versus generics – Latanoprost

How similar is different?

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Um die Vergleichbarkeit aller Latanoprost-Präparate bzw. deren Generika zu prüfen, wurde die Wirkstoffkonzentration der in Deutschland verfügbaren Präparate getestet. In Europa wird für einen Bereich von (− 20 bis + 25 %) von einer Bioäquivalenz ausgegangen.

Material und Methoden

Verfügbare Präparate wurden beschafft und erfasst. Die Konzentration von Latanoprost und Benzalkoniumchlorid wurde bei 23 Produkten mittels „high-performance liquid chromatography“ (HPLC) in einem validierten Referenzlabor bestimmt. Außerdem wurden noch das mittlere Tropfenvolumen und der pH der Wirkstoffformulierung getestet. Die Verpackungen wurden erfasst und die Lesbarkeit der Gebrauchsinformationen überprüft.

Ergebnisse

Alle Produkte enthielten weniger als 50 μg/ml Latanoprost. Die unterschiedlich erniedrigte Wirkstoffmenge (mittlere Abweichung: − 7,39 %,  ± 2,8 %) wurde noch von Schwankungen der Tropfenmenge (mittleres Gewicht 0,03 g,  ± 0,002 g) überlagert. Dafür war die Benzalkoniumchlorid-Konzentration zum Teil deutlich höher (Median Abweichung 5,45 %, min: − 2,5 %, max: 11,5 %). Der pH-Wert des ursprünglichen Originalpräparates und seiner Generika hatte einen Median von 6,78 (min: 6,62, max: 6,81) und unterschied sich somit von einer unkonservierten Latanoprost-Formulierung (pH 7,18). Die beiliegende Gebrauchsinformation der meisten Generika war aufgrund einer zu kleinen Schriftgröße für Menschen mit reduzierter Sehschärfe nicht lesbar.

Schlussfolgerungen

Für die Verordnung von Ophthalmologika ist zu berücksichtigen, dass verschiedene Einflussfaktoren zu einer schwankenden Drucksenkung im Ergebnis beitragen können. Angesichts einer fehlenden Versorgungsforschung ist unklar, inwieweit sich auch deutliche Unterschiede einer Tropfflasche mit anderem Erscheinungsbild und erhöhtem Druckpunkt auf die nicht unproblematische Adhärenz von Glaukompatienten auswirken können.

Abstract

Background

To test the interchangeability of the commercially available (in Germany) latanoprost drugs and their generics respectively, the concentration of the active substance was tested. Guidelines of the European Medicines Agency postulate a sufficient bioequivalence, if the range of the agent is within 80–125 % of the original drug.

Methods

All compounds of latanoprost were procured registered. The concentration of latanoprost and benzalkoniumchloride was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in a validated reference labroratory for 23 generics. In addition, the mean volume of drops and the pH of the formulation were measured. The packaging label and the readability of the enclosed information leaflet were checked.

Results

All products contained less than 50 μg/ml latanoprost. The deviating reduction of the active substance (mean: − 7.39 %, ± 2.8 %) was accompanied by fluctions of the eyedrops’ mass (mean: 0.03 g, ± 0.002 g). The concentration of benzalkonium chloride was mostly increased (median: 5.45 %, min: − 2.5 %, max: 11.5 %). The pH of the original drug and the generics (median 6.78, min: 6.62, max: 6.81) was similar to the original drug, but was significantly different from an unpreserved formulation (pH 7.18). Due to type size, the packaging leaflet was illegible for humans with impaired vision.

Conclusions

Before prescribing generics in ophthalmology, different factors have to be considered, which might influence the amount of IOP lowering in effect. In the absence of healthcare research it is still unclear, how different bottle forms of eyedrops—such as appearance (e.g. Cyrillic characters) or pressure point (administration)—reduce the adherence of glaucoma patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Agency EM (2010) Guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence. In: Agency EM (Hrsg). http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2010/01/WC500070039.pdf

  2. Agency EM (1995) Note for guidance on the clinical requirements for locally applied, locally acting products containing known constituents. European Medicines Agency. http://ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003687.pdf, S 4

  3. Allaire C, Dietrich A, Allmeier H et al (2012) Latanoprost 0.005 % test formulation is as effective as Xalatan® in patients with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 22:19–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Almuzaini T, Choonara I, Sammons H (2013) Substandard and counterfeit medicines: a systematic review of the literature. BMJ Open 3:e002923

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roche.de (2013) Informationen für Patienten: Aussehen der Roche-Fertigspritze Pegasys. Roche Deutschland Holding GmbH. http://www.roche.de/presse/meldungen/Informationen-fuer-Patienten-Aussehen-der-Original-Fertigspritze-Pegasyssupsup-3464. html?sid=01e4b1cedbb57fc42687f171747b77d3&bereich=Alle

  6. Bernauer W, Thiel MA, Rentsch KM (2007) Phosphate concentrations in antiglaucoma medication. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 224:249–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Borgheini G (2003) The bioequivalence and therapeutic efficacy of generic versus brand-name psychoactive drugs. Clin Ther 25:1578–1592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Briesen S, Guthoff R, Kilangalanga N et al (2012) Counterfeiting of eye drops? A laboratory study of antibiotic eye drops purchased in two African countries. Ophthalmologe 109:1207–1210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cantor LB (1997) Ophthalmic generic drug approval process: implications for efficacy and safety. J Glaucoma 6:344–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chambers WA (2012) Ophthalmic generics – are they really the same? Ophthalmology 119:1095–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang DS, Friedman DS, Frazier T et al (2013) Development and validation of a predictive model for nonadherence with once-daily glaucoma medications. Ophthalmology 120:1396–1402

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Commission E (2009) Guideline on the readability of the label and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use. Revision 1, S 27. http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-2/c/2009_01_12_readability_guideline_final_en.pdf

  13. Desbenoit N, Schmitz-Afonso I, Baudouin C et al (2013) Localisation and quantification of benzalkonium chloride in eye tissue by TOF-SIMS imaging and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:4039–4049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Diestelhorst M, Roters S, Krieglstein GK (1997) The effect of latanoprost 0.005 % once daily versus 0.0015 % twice daily on intraocular pressure and aqueous humour protein concentration in glaucoma patients. A randomized, double-masked comparison with timolol 0.5 %. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:20–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Friedlaender MH, Breshears D, Amoozgar B et al (2006) The dilution of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) in the tear film. Adv Ther 23:835–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukuda M, Shibata S, Shibata N et al (2013) Safety comparison of additives in antiglaucoma prostaglandin (PG) analog ophthalmic formulations. Clin Ophthalmol 7:515–520

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goff SL, Mazor KM, Meterko V et al (2008) Patients‘ beliefs and preferences regarding doctors‘ medication recommendations. J Gen Intern Med 23:236–241

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hermann MM, Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher CP et al (2011) Measurement of adherence to brimonidine therapy for glaucoma using electronic monitoring. J Glaucoma 20:502–508

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inc P (1996) Xalatan Produkt-Monography. Prostaglandin F2α analogue. Control No. 158286 FDA Zulassungsunterlagen NDA 20-597

  20. Johnson TV, Gupta PK, Vudathala DK et al (2011) Thermal stability of bimatoprost, latanoprost, and travoprost under simulated daily use. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 27:51–59

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kahook MY, Fechtner RD, Katz LJ et al (2012) A comparison of active ingredients and preservatives between brand name and generic topical glaucoma medications using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Curr Eye Res 37:101–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaur IP, Kanwar M (2002) Ocular preparations: the formulation approach. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 28:473–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kesselheim AS, Misono AS, Lee JL et al (2008) Clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 300:2514–2526

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khan A (2004) WHO drops two generics from approved HIV drugs list. Lancet 363:2147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim EJ, Kim YH, Kang SH et al (2013) In vitro effects of preservative-free and preserved prostaglandin analogs on primary cultured human conjunctival fibroblast cells. Korean J Ophthalmol 27:446–453

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Law SK (2009) Switching within glaucoma medication class. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20:110–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mammo ZN, Flanagan JG, James DF et al (2012) Generic versus brand-name North American topical glaucoma drops. Can J Ophthalmol 47:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Masri MA, Andrysek T, Rizk S et al (2004) The role of generics in transplantation: TM-MMF versus Cellcept in healthy volunteers. Transplant Proc 36:84–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morgan PV, Proniuk S, Blanchard J et al (2001) Effect of temperature and light on the stability of latanoprost and its clinical relevance. J Glaucoma 10:401–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pauly A, Roubeix C, Liang H et al (2012) In vitro and in vivo comparative toxicological study of a new preservative-free latanoprost formulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:8172–8180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pellinen P, Lokkila J (2009) Corneal penetration into rabbit aqueous humor is comparable between preserved and preservative-free tafluprost. Ophthalmic Res 41:118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Products TEaFTEOMP-CFPOM (2001) Note for guidance on the investigation of bioavailability and bioequivalence. In: Products TEAftEoMP-CfPoM (Hrsg). http://www.ema.europe.eu

  33. Progenerika_E.V. (2013) http://www.progenerika.de/downloads/10408/Marktdaten2012

  34. Schlote T (2002) Side-effects and risk profile of latanoprost 0.005 % (Xalatan). Ophthalmologe 99:724–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Simmenroth-Nayda A, Hummers-Pradier E, Ledig T et al (2006) Prescription of generic drugs in general practice. Results of a survey of general practitioners. Med Klin 101:705–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sjoquist B, Stjernschantz J (2002) Ocular and systemic pharmacokinetics of latanoprost in humans. Surv Ophthalmol 47(Suppl 1):S6–S12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Takada Y, Okada Y, Fujita N et al (2012) A patient with corneal epithelial disorder that developed after administration of a latanoprost generic, but not a brand-name drug, eye drop. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. doi: 10.1155/2012/536746

  38. Van Santvliet L, Ludwig A (2004) Determinants of eye drop size. Surv Ophthalmol 49:197–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu M, Sivak JG, Mccanna DJ (2013) Comparison of the effects of ophthalmic solutions on human corneal epithelial cells using fluorescent dyes. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 29:794–802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yee RW (2007) The effect of drop vehicle on the efficacy and side effects of topical glaucoma therapy: a review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 18:134–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zachry WM III, Doan QD, Clewell JD et al (2009) Case-control analysis of ambulance, emergency room, or inpatient hospital events for epilepsy and antiepileptic drug formulation changes. Epilepsia 50:493–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zore M, Harris A, Tobe LA et al (2013) Generic medications in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol 97:253–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. M.A. Leitritz, H.-P. Lipp, B. Voykov und F. Ziemssen geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.A. Leitritz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leitritz, M., Lipp, HP., Voykov, B. et al. Originalpräparat versus Generika – Latanoprost. Ophthalmologe 112, 127–139 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-014-3097-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-014-3097-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation