Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

From laser-on time to lithotripsy duration: how neural networks can refine “KIDNEY STONE CALCULATOR” predictions for ureteroscopic lithotripsy duration: preliminary results

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Data availability

All data is available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Stamatelou K, Goldfarb DS (2023) Epidemiology of kidney stones. Healthcare Basel Switz 11:424. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:475–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Turing AM (1950) I.—computing machinery and intelligence. Mind. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Panthier F, Doizi S, Lapouge P et al (2020) Comparison of the ablation rates, fissures and fragments produced with 150 µm and 272 µm laser fibers with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03186-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Panthier F, Traxer O, Yonneau L et al (2021) Evaluation of a free 3D software for kidney stones’ surgical planning: “kidney stone calculator” a pilot study. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03671-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwok J-L, De Coninck V, Ventimiglia E et al (2023) Laser ablation efficiency, laser ablation speed, and laser energy consumption during lithotripsy: what are they and how are they defined? A systematic review and proposal for a standardized terminology. Eur Urol Focus S2405–4569(23):00222–00225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cumpanas AD, Chantaduly C, Morgan KL et al (2023) Efficient and accurate computed tomography-based stone volume determination: development of an automated artificial intelligence algorithm. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ito H, Sakamaki K, Fukuda T et al (2023) Models to predict the surgical outcome of mini-ECIRS (endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery) for renal and/or ureteral stones. Sci Rep 13:22848. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50022-6

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Corrales M, Sierra A, Doizi S, Traxer O (2022) Risk of sepsis in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol Open Sci 44:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Frédéric Panthier received a French Association of Urology research grant in 2023.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service d’Urologie, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France

    Frédéric Panthier & Olivier Traxer

  2. GRC N°20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France

    Frédéric Panthier & Olivier Traxer

  3. PIMM, UMR 8006 CNRS-Arts et Métiers ParisTech, 151 bd de L’Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France

    Frédéric Panthier, Laurent Berthe, Chady Ghnatios & Olivier Traxer

  4. Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital, and Clinical Microbiology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

    Frédéric Panthier & Daron Smith

Authors
  1. Frédéric Panthier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laurent Berthe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chady Ghnatios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daron Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Olivier Traxer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Frederic Panthier had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. F Panthier Protocol/project development, Data collection or management, Data analysis. D Smith Data analysis, Manuscript writing/editing. L Berthe Protocol/project development. C Ghatios Data analysis, Manuscript writing/editing. O Traxer Protocol/project development, Data analysis, Manuscript writing/editing.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest but: Frédéric Panthier has declared as consultant for Dornier. Olivier Traxer has declared as consultant for Karl Storz, Coloplast, IPG photonics, Ambu, Quanta System and Rocamed. Daron SMITH has declared as member of the Endourology Academy and Social Media Committee oft the Endourological Society.

Ethical approval

Approval from the ethical committee of the French Association of Urology (CERU-AFU) was obtained (reference:CERU_2020/003). An official declaration to the National Commission of Informatics and Freedoms (CNIL) was also made (reference: 2216615V0-MR-004).

Informed consent

A written informed consent was obtained from all patients after explaining the study protocol and giving an information sheet.

Research involving human participants

The present study included human participants, with an informed written consent. Data anonymization was assured by the principal investigator.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panthier, F., Berthe, L., Ghnatios, C. et al. From laser-on time to lithotripsy duration: how neural networks can refine “KIDNEY STONE CALCULATOR” predictions for ureteroscopic lithotripsy duration: preliminary results. World J Urol 42, 99 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04882-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04882-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation