Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Challenging the dogma of 6 steps for anastomotic urethroplasty in posterior urethral stricture: introducing step 3a

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Webster GD, Goldwasser B (1986) Perineal transpubic repair: a technique for treating post-traumatic prostatomembranous urethral strictures. J Urol 135:278–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Joshi PM, Kulkarni SB (2020) Management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries in the developing world. World J Urol 38:3027–3034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandini M, Barbagli G, Leni R et al (2021) Assessing in-hospital morbidity after urethroplasty using the European Association of Urology Quality Criteria for standardized reporting. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03692-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnsen NV, Moses RA, Elliott SP et al (2020) Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury. World J Urol 38:1073–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horiguchi A, Shinchi M, Ojima K et al (2019) Single-surgeon series of delayed anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury: an analysis of surgical and patient-reported outcomes of a 10-year experience in a Japanese referral center. World J Urol 37:655–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Joshi PM, Kulkarni SB (2020) 3D printing of pelvic fracture urethral injuries-fusion of technology and urethroplasty. Turk J Urol 46:76–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kulkarni SB, Barbagli G, Kulkarni JS et al (2010) Posterior urethral stricture after pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects in developing and developed countries, and choice of surgical technique. J Urol 183:1049–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Pankaj Joshi and Marco Bandini have equally contributed to the manuscript.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India

    Pankaj Joshi, Marco Bandini & Sanjay B. Kulkarni

  2. Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy

    Marco Bandini & Francesco Montorsi

  3. Centro Chirurgico Toscano, Arezzo, Italy

    Marco Bandini

Authors
  1. Pankaj Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Bandini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesco Montorsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sanjay B. Kulkarni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MB: protocol/project development, data collection or management, and manuscript writing/editing. PJ: data collection or management, and manuscript writing/editing. SK: manuscript writing/editing, and protocol/project development. FM: protocol/project development.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Bandini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

None to declare.

Informed consent

All patients signed an informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshi, P., Bandini, M., Montorsi, F. et al. Challenging the dogma of 6 steps for anastomotic urethroplasty in posterior urethral stricture: introducing step 3a. World J Urol 40, 1277–1278 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03823-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03823-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation