Skip to main content
Log in

A qualitative framework of non-selection factors for cytoreductive nephrectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) benefits a subset of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), however proper patient selection remains complex and controversial. We aim to characterize urologists’ reasons for not undertaking a CN at a quaternary cancer center.

Methods

Consecutive patients with mRCC referred to MSKCC urologists for consideration of CN between 2009 and 2019 were included. Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics were used to compare patients selected or rejected for CN. The reasons cited for not operating and the alternative management strategies recommended were extrapolated. Using an iterative thematic analysis, a framework of reasons for rejecting CN was designed. Kaplan–Meier estimates tested for associations between the reasons for not undertaking a CN and overall survival (OS).

Results

Of 297 patients with biopsy-proven mRCC, 217 (73%) underwent CN and 80 (27%) did not. Median follow-up of patients alive at data cut-off was 27.3 months. Non-operative patients were older (p = 0.014), had more sites of metastases (p = 0.008), harbored non-clear cell histology (p = 0.014) and reduced performance status (p < 0.001). The framework comprised seven distinct themes for recommending non-operative management: two patient-fitness considerations and five oncological considerations. These considerations were associated with OS; four of the oncological factors conferred a median OS of less than 12 months (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

We developed a framework of criteria by which patients were deemed unsuitable candidates for CN. These new insights provide a novel perspective on surgical selection, could potentially be applicable to other malignancies and possibly have prognostic implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Statistical analyses were completed using R version 3.5.1 (R Core Development Team, Vienna, Austria). Code can be provided upon request.

References

  1. Conti SL, Thomas IC, Hagedorn JC, Chung BI, Chertow GM, Wagner TH, Brooks JD, Srinivas S, Leppert JT (2014) Utilization of cytoreductive nephrectomy and patient survival in the targeted therapy era. Int J Cancer 134(9):2245–2252. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gershman B, Moreira DM, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, Costello BA, Leibovich BC, Thompson RH (2016) Comprehensive characterization of the perioperative morbidity of cytoreductive nephrectomy. Eur Urol 69(1):84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Flanigan RC, Salmon SE, Blumenstein BA, Bearman SI, Roy V, McGrath PC, Caton JR Jr, Munshi N, Crawford ED (2001) Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. N Engl J Med 345(23):1655–1659. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa003013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mickisch GH, Garin A, van Poppel H, de Prijck L, Sylvester R (2001) Radical nephrectomy plus interferon-alfa-based immunotherapy compared with interferon alfa alone in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised trial. Lancet 358(9286):966–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06103-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mejean A, Ravaud A, Thezenas S, Colas S, Beauval JB, Bensalah K, Geoffrois L, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Cormier L, Lang H, Guy L, Gravis G, Rolland F, Linassier C, Lechevallier E, Beisland C, Aitchison M, Oudard S, Patard JJ, Theodore C, Chevreau C, Laguerre B, Hubert J, Gross-Goupil M, Bernhard JC, Albiges L, Timsit MO, Lebret T, Escudier B (2018) Sunitinib alone or after nephrectomy in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 379(5):417–427. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1803675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arora S, Sood A, Dalela D, Tang HJ, Patel A, Keeley J, Trinh QD, Rogers CG, Menon M, Abdollah F (2019) Cytoreductive nephrectomy: assessing the generalizability of the CARMENA trial to real-world national cancer data base cases. Eur Urol 75(2):352–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Motzer RJ, Russo P (2018) Cytoreductive nephrectomy—patient selection is key. N Engl J Med 379(5):481–482. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1806331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Culp SH, Tannir NM, Abel EJ, Margulis V, Tamboli P, Matin SF, Wood CG (2010) Can we better select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma for cytoreductive nephrectomy? Cancer 116(14):3378–3388. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, Warren MA, Golshayan AR, Sahi C, Eigl BJ, Ruether JD, Cheng T, North S, Venner P, Knox JJ, Chi KN, Kollmannsberger C, McDermott DF, Oh WK, Atkins MB, Bukowski RM, Rini BI, Choueiri TK (2009) Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27(34):5794–5799. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.21.4809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Murphy BA, Russo P, Mazumdar M (2002) Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20(1):289–296. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.20.1.289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Finelli A, Ismaila N, Bro B, Durack J, Eggener S, Evans A, Gill I, Graham D, Huang W, Jewett MAS, Latcha S, Lowrance W, Rosner M, Shayegan B, Thompson RH, Uzzo R, Russo P (2017) Management of small renal masses: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 35(6):668–680. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Briganti A, Fossati N, Catto JWF, Cornford P, Montorsi F, Mottet N, Wirth M, Van Poppel H (2018) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: the European Association of Urology position in 2018. Eur Urol 74(3):357–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME, Bass EB, Cadeddu JA, Chang A, Clark PE, Davis BJ, Derweesh IH, Giambarresi L, Gervais DA, Hu SL, Lane BR, Leibovich BC, Pierorazio PM (2017) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol 198(3):520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bex A, Mulders P, Jewett M, Wagstaff J, van Thienen JV, Blank CU, van Velthoven R, Del Pilar LM, Wood L, van Melick HHE, Aarts MJ, Lattouf JB, Powles T, de Jong MdPhDI, Rottey S, Tombal B, Marreaud S, Collette S, Collette L, Haanen J (2019) Comparison of immediate vs deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib: the SURTIME Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA oncology 5(2):164–170. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhindi B, Graham J, Wells JC, Bakouny Z, Donskov F, Fraccon A, Pasini F, Lee JL, Basappa NS, Hansen A, Kollmannsberger CK, Kanesvaran R, Yuasa T, Ernst DS, Srinivas S, Rini BI, Bowman I, Pal SK, Choueiri TK, Heng DYC (2020) Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rini BI, Dorff TB, Elson P, Rodriguez CS, Shepard D, Wood L, Humbert J, Pyle L, Wong YN, Finke JH, Rayman PA, Larkin JM, Garcia JA, Plimack ER (2016) Active surveillance in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a prospective, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 17(9):1317–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30196-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bimbatti D, Ciccarese C, Fantinel E, Sava T, Massari F, Bisogno I, Romano M, Porcaro A, Brunelli M, Martignoni G, Mazzarotto R, Artibani W, Tortora G, Iacovelli R (2018) Predictive role of changes in the tumor burden and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium class during active surveillance for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 36(12):526.e513-526.e518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marcus SG, Choyke PL, Reiter R, Jaffe GS, Alexander RB, Linehan WM, Rosenberg SA, Walther MM (1993) Regression of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after cytoreductive nephrectomy. J Urol 150(2 Pt 1):463–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35514-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Supported by: the Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers and the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center through the Cancer Center Support Grant, award number P30 CA008748.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AWS: Data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. KA: Data collection, manuscript writing. RGD: Project development, manuscript writing, data analysis. KW: Project development, data collection. SW: Manuscript writing. RM: Project development, manuscript editing. SI: Data collection. JM: Project development, data collection. ER: Project development, data analysis. RRK: Project development, manuscript editing. RJM: Project development, manuscript editing. MHV: Project development, manuscript editing. JAC: Project development, data collection, manuscript editing. AAH: Project development, data collection, manuscript editing. PR: Project development, data collection, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Russo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant disclosures pertaining to this manuscript.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research involving human participants/Ethical approval retrospective studies

This research was conducted after obtaining Institutional Review Board approval.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 38 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silagy, A.W., Attalla, K., Dinatale, R.G. et al. A qualitative framework of non-selection factors for cytoreductive nephrectomy. World J Urol 39, 3359–3365 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03650-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03650-4

Keywords

Navigation