Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comment on “Bladder infusion versus standard catheter removal for trial of void: a systematic review and meta-analysis”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 14 August 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Makary J, Phan K, McClintock G, Doctor M, Habashy D, Heywood S et al (2020) Bladder infusion versus standard catheter removal for trial of void: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03408-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mowat A, Brown B, Pelecanos A, Mowat V, Frazer M (2018) Infusion-fill method versus standard auto-fill trial of void protocol following a TVT-exact procedure: a randomised controlled trial. Austr N Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol 58(5):564–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma G, Sharma AP, Mavuduru RS, Devana SK, Bora GS, Singh SK (2020) Safety and efficacy of bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03201-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma G, Sharma S, Parmar K (2020) Buccal mucosa or penile skin for substitution urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Urol 36:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India

    Gopal Sharma, Shantanu Tyagi, Kalpesh Parmar & Santosh Kumar

Authors
  1. Gopal Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shantanu Tyagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kalpesh Parmar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Santosh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GS: protocol development, data collection and management, data analysis and manuscript writing. ST: protocol development, data collection and management, data analysis and manuscript writing. KP: protocol development, data collection and management, data analysis and manuscript writing. SK: manuscript writing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gopal Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, G., Tyagi, S., Parmar, K. et al. Comment on “Bladder infusion versus standard catheter removal for trial of void: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. World J Urol 40, 293–294 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03424-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03424-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation