Skip to main content
Log in

Four-arm robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal cell carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) remains challenging to even experienced laparoscopists. Complex renal tumors add an additional challenge to a minimally invasive approach to nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). We represented our technique and results of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for hilar, endophytic, and multiple renal tumors.

Materials and methods

Between May 2006 and March 2008, 29 patients with complex renal tumors underwent RPN, including hilar (n = 14), endophytic (n = 12) and multiple tumors (n = 3).The hilar vessels were clamped with laparoscopic bulldog with warm ischemia. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 23 months (mean of 15 mo). The perioperative data and pathologic results were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Robotic partial nephrectomy procedures were performed successfully without complications. The mean diameter of tumors was 3.0 cm (range 2.0–4.0). The mean operative time was 197 minutes (range 172–259), and the mean blood loss was 220 ml (range 100–370). The mean warm ischemia time (WIT) was 25 min (range 16–43). The hospital stay averaged 2.5 days (range 2–3). Histopathology confirmed clear-cell carcinoma (n = 21), chromophobe cell carcinoma (n = 4), hybrid oncocytic tumor (n = 2), oncocytoma (n = 1), and cystic renal cell carcinoma (n = 1). All cases had negative surgical margins. At the 3–23 months (mean of 15 mo) follow-up, no patients experienced a significant change of glomerular filtration rate compared to preoperative levels and there was no evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

Robotic partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible procedure. RPN is a preferred approach for complex renal tumors when NSS is indicated. For complex and technical challenging renal tumors, robotic assistance may provide patients the benefit of minimally invasive surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al (2007) Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 178:41–46. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Erik S, Weise MD, Howard N (2005) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 19(6):634–642. doi:10.1089/end.2005.19.634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Phillips CK, Taneja SS, Stifelman MD (2005) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the NYU technique. J Endourol 19:441–445. doi:10.1089/end.2005.19.441 (discussion 445)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R et al (2007) Da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 51:186–192. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laura EC, Rebecca AN et al (2008) Multi-institutional study of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis pulmonary embolism in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 53:134–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jim CH, Timothy GW, Mark HK et al (2005) Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical rostatectomy. J Urol 175:541–546

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laura EC, Timothy GW, Rebecca AN et al (2008) Can robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy be recommended to obese patients? J Robotic Surg 1:297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64:914–918. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caruso RP, Phillips CK, Kau E, Taneja SS, Stifelman MD (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. J Urol 176(1):36–39. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00499-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Craig GR, Amar S, Adam MB et al (2008) Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol 53:514–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson T, Ng CF, Tolley D (2003) Renal parenchymal hemostatic aids: glues and things. Curr Opin Urol 13:209–214. doi:10.1097/00042307-200305000-00007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leslie AD, Hak JL, Geoffrey NB et al (2008) Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol 22(5):947–952. doi:10.1089/end.2007.0376

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Gong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gong, Y., Du, C., Josephson, D.Y. et al. Four-arm robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 28, 111–115 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0427-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0427-8

Keywords

Navigation