Skip to main content
Log in

Reflectance difference spectroscopy – a powerful tool to study adsorption and growth

  • Published:
Applied Physics A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in the optical anisotropy of the Cu(110) surface due to adsorption and growth have been studied by reflectance difference spectroscopy (RDS). The optical anisotropy signal at 2.13 eV was found to be extremely sensitive to small quantities of CO, while the signal at 4.3 eV turned out to be particularly sensitive to the transition from a (3×1) to a (2×1) CO superstructure. In the case of the oxygen covered Cu(110), we have successfully monitored and analyzed the transition between two oxygen induced Cu(110) reconstructions: The c(6×2)O and the (2×1)O phases have clearly distinguishable RDS features, and the transition between them leads to a gradual transformation of the related RDS spectra. For the system Co on Cu(110)(2×1)O characteristic features of a CoCuO alloy phase have been identified, which allow to monitor the crucial stages of the Co thin film growth. The alloying and de-alloying are easily recognized with RDS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y.C. Chang, S.F. Ren, D.E. Aspnes: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 10, 1956 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. L.F. Lastras-Martínez, D. Rónnow, P.V. Santos, M. Cardona, K. Eberl: Phys. Rev. B 64, 245303 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. R.E. Balderas-Navarro, K. Hingerl, A. Bonanni, H. Sitter, D. Stifter: Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3615 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. W.L. Mochan, R. Barrera: Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1192 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. P.H. Hahn, G.W. Schmidt, F. Bechstedt: Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 016402 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.T. Zettler, T. Wethkamp, M. Zorn, M. Pristovsek, C. Meyne, K. Ploska, W. Richter: Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 3783 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Hofmann, K.C. Rose, V. Fernandez, A.M. Bradshaw: Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2039 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Stahrenberg, T. Herrmann, N. Esser, W. Richter: Phys. Rev. B 61, 3043 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.K. Hansen, J. Bremer, O. Hunderi: Surf. Sci. 418, 58 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. D.S. Martin, A.M. Davarpanah, S.D. Barrett, P. Weightman: Phys. Rev. B 62, 15417 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. L.D. Sun, M. Hohage, P. Zeppenfeld, R.E. Balderas-Navarro, K. Hingerl: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 106104 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. L.D. Sun, M. Hohage, P. Zeppenfeld, R.E. Balderas-Navarro, K. Hingerl: Surf. Sci. 527, 148 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Stahrenberg, T. Herrmann, N. Esser, W. Richter, S.V. Hoffmann, P. Hofmann: Phys. Rev. B 58, 10207 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Mazine, Y. Borensztein: Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 147403 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. D.E. Aspnes: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 3, 1498 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Rogozik, H. Scheidt, V. Dose, K.C. Prince, A.M. Bradshaw: Surf. Sci. 145, 481 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. B.G. Briner, M. Doering, H.-P. Rust, A.M. Bradshaw: Science 278, 257 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Kern, H. Niehus, A. Schatz, P. Zeppenfeld, J. Goerge, G. Comsa: Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 855 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Zeppenfeld, V. Diercks, C. Tölkes, R. David, M.A. Krzyzowski: Appl. Surf. Sci. 130132, 484 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Besenbacher, J.K. Nørskov: Prog. Surf. Sci. 44, 5 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. G.R. Gruzalski, D.M. Zehner, J.F. Wendelken: Surf. Sci. 147, 623 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. G.R. Gruzalski, D.M. Zehner, J.F. Wendelken, R.S. Hathcock: Surf. Sci. 151, 430 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. L.D. Sun, M. Hohage, P. Zeppenfeld: Phys. Rev. B 69, 045407 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. S.S.P. Parkin, Z.G. Li, D.J. Smith: Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2710 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. S.S.P. Parkin, R. Bhadra, K.P. Roche: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2152 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Tölkes, R. Struck, R. David, P. Zeppenfeld, G. Comsa: Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2877 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. C. Tölkes, R. Struck, R. David, P. Zeppenfeld, G. Comsa: Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1059 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. T. Hermann, K. Lüdge, W. Richter, N. Esser, P. Poulopoulos, J. Lindner, K. Baberschke: Phys. Rev. B 64, 184424 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. W.L. Ling, O. Takeuchi, D.F. Ogletree, Z.Q. Qiu, M. Salmeron: Surf. Sci. 450, 227 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Hohage.

Additional information

PACS

78.40.-q; 68.35.-p; 68.43.-h; 68.55.-a; 78.66.Bz; 78.68.+m

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hohage, M., Sun, L. & Zeppenfeld, P. Reflectance difference spectroscopy – a powerful tool to study adsorption and growth. Appl. Phys. A 80, 1005–1010 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-004-3128-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-004-3128-6

Keywords

Navigation