Skip to main content
Log in

First identification of plant remains in earthen architecture of Argentina: constructive and domestic archaeological data from early colonial contexts (16th and 17th centuries)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses, from an archaeological and ethnobotanical perspective, the botanical remains recovered from earthen architecture of Ibatín and Esteco I/II sites, ruins of the first cities established and depopulated in North-western Argentina along the Spanish advance during the 16th and 17th centuries. Sampling procedure, processing of the sediments and identification of botanical macro and microremains, predominantly opal silica phytoliths, were carried out on the basis of standard methodology to identify botanical remains. Diatoms and microcharcoals were also recorded. Additionally, ethnobotanical research was conducted in order to obtain data from local inhabitants related to traditional earth construction techniques and vegetable fibres used in the process. The integration of the results obtained from both approaches allowed us to generate some proposals regarding the techniques for obtaining and using the plants used in the construction activity and associated practices in the region during the colonial period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(modified from Rivet 2009: p 179). a map showing provenience of M1-M4 samples and 1 Cabildo (colonial town hall), 2–5 churches; A indicates housing enclosures from which carporemains were recovered. b mudbrick from which M1 was obtained

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson PC (1999) Experimental cultivation, Harvest, and Threshing of Wild Cereals: their relevance for interpreting the Use of Epipaleolithic and neolithic artifacts. In: Anderson PC (ed) Prehistory of Agriculture. New Experimental and Ethnographic Approaches. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles, pp 118–144

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball TB, Ehlers R, Standing MD (2009) Review of typologic and morphometric analysis of phytoliths produced by wheat and barley. Breed Sci 59:505–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbarich MF (2023) Especies vegetales en la arquitectura vernácula de la región altoandina jujeña. Criterios locales y políticas públicas en torno a la conservación, sustentabilidad y uso. Huellas 27:75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugallo L (2019) Los puneños y la cría de sus cultivos. Prácticas agrícolas en la puna jujeña durante el siglo XX. Illes i Imperis 21:225–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxó R (1997) Arqueología de las plantas: La explotación económica de las semillas y los frutos en el marco mediterráneo de la Península Ibérica. Crítica, Grijalbo Mondadori, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxó R, Piqué R (2003) La recogida de muestras en arqueobotánica: Objetivos y propuestas metodológicas. Museu d’Arqueologia de Catalunya, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Canti MG (1997) An investigation of microscopic calcareous spherulites from herbivore dungs. J Archaeol Sci 24:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capparelli A, Raffino R (1997) La etnobotánica de El Shincal (Catamarca) y su importancia para la arqueología I: recursos combustibles y madereros. Parodiana 10:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Capparelli A, Zagorodny N, Balesta B (2003) Wood remains from Andean Argentina: the use of Prosopis sp. L. in hut construction. J Ethnobiol 23:143–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Capparelli A, Lema V, Giovannetti M, Raffino R (2005) The introduction of Old World crops (wheat, barley and peach) in Andean Argentina during the 16th century A.D.: archaeobotanical and ethnohistorical evidence. Veget Hist Archaeobot 14:472–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-005-0093-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capparelli A, Lema V, López ML et al (2015) Comechingonia Revista de Arqueología 19:19–54. https://doi.org/10.37603/2250.7728.v19.n2.18131. El estudio de la dinámica de interacciones humanos-plantas en Argentina: historia de la construcción de un abordaje interdisciplinar desde el Museo de La Plata (FCNyM-UNLP)

  • Castillón V (2021) Viñas y árboles frutales en el registro etnohistórico del noroeste Argentino: apuntes para la investigación arqueológica (vines and fruit trees in the ethnohistorical record of the Argentine Northwest: notes for archaeological research). Chungará (Arica) 53:103–116. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-73562021005000401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillón V (2022) Modos de uso y circulación de vegetales en contextos urbanos del Tucumán colonial (siglos XVI y XVII): Una aproximación con énfasis arqueobotánico. Doctoral Thesis. https://doi.org/10.35537/10915/146062. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier A, Bosquet D (2010) Apports de l’analyse des phytolithes en contexte détritique rubané: résultats obtenus sur cinq sites del hesbaye liégeoise (Belgique). In: Delhon C, Théry-Parisot I, Tiébault S (eds) Des homes et des plantes: Exploitaition du milieu et des ressources végétales de la Préhistoire à nos jours. Actes du XXXèmes recontres internationales d’archéologie et d’histoire d’Antibes (Juan-les-pins 22–24 octobre 2009). Éditions APDCA, Antibes, pp 31–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciampagna ML, Molares S, Ladio AH, Capparelli A (2021) Starchy food residue on a potsherd from a late Holocene hunter-gatherer site in Argentine Patagonia: towards the visibility of wild underground storage organs. Veget Hist Archaeobot 30:89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-020-00818-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colobig M, de los Miagros, Zucol A, Brea M, Franco MJ, Passeggi E, Cocco G, Sánchez-Pinto I (2017) Restos arqueobotánicos del sitio arqueológico fuerte sancti spiritus, Santa Fe, Argentina. Comechingonia 21:275–304. https://doi.org/10.37603/2250.7728.v21.n2.26784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coronel D, Velardez Fresia MB, Flores PE, Barazutti MJ (2016) Informe preliminar sobre la excavación del sitio Esteco II (Dpto. Metán, Salta). Serie Monográfica y Didáctica 54:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortella AR, Pochettino ML (1995) Comparative morphology of starch of three Andean Tubers. Starch - Stärke 47:455–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19950471202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fina A, Ravello AC (1975) Climatología y Fenología Agrícola, 2nd edn. Editorial Universitana de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Eudeba

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz BG, Zucchi MI, Alves-Pereira A et al (2021) Genome–wide SNP analysis to assess the genetic population structure and diversity of Acrocomia species. PLoS ONE 16:e0241025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst M, Jacomet S (2006) The value of the archaeobotanical analysis of desiccated plant remains from old buildings: methodological aspects and interpretation of crop weed assemblages. Veget Hist Archaeobot 15:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-005-0077-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero Baca LF (2007) Arquitectura en tierra: Hacia la recuperación de una cultura constructiva. Apuntes: Revista de estudios sobre patrimonio cultural /. J Cult Herit Stud 20:182–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Henn T, Nagy DU, Pál RW (2016) Adobe bricks can help identify historic weed flora – a case study from south-western Hungary. Plant Ecol Divers 9:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igareta A (2019) Evidencias arqueológicas del uso del barro como materia prima en la arquitectura argentina del periodo colonial temprano. Anales de Investigación en Arquitectura 9:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igareta A, Erra G (2015) Fitolitos presentes en material arqueológico colonial de Santiago de Estero (Argentina). Ameghiniana - Suplemento resúmenes 52:18. https://doi.org/10.5710/AMGH.v52i4.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISE (International Society of Ethnobiology) (2006) International Society of Ethnobiology (ISE) Code of Ethics (with 2008 additions). https://www.ethnobiology.net/what-we-do/core-programs/ise-ethics-program/code-of-ethics/code-in-english/

  • Korstanje A (2005) Microfossils in camelid dung: taphonomical consideration for the archaeological study of agriculture and pastoralism. In: O’Connor T (ed) Biosphere to Lithosphere: new studies in vertebrate taphonomy. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 69–77

    Google Scholar 

  • López ML (2007) Los vegetales comestibles en la economía prehispánica tardía de sierras centrales. Estudios arqueobotánicos en el valle de Punilla y el valle de Salsacate (provincia de Córdoba). Tesis de grado, Escuela de Historia, Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba

  • López L, Capparelli A, Nielsen A (2011) Traditional post-harvest processing to make quinoa grains (Chenopodium quinoa var. Quinoa) apt for consumption in Northern Lípez (Potosí, Bolivia): ethnoarchaeological and archaeobotanical analyses. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 3(1):49–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzon M (2021) From chaff to seagrass: the unique quality of Minoan mudbricks. A geoarchaeological approach to the study of architectural craft specialization in bronze age Crete. J Archaeol Sci Rep 40, Part A:103122

  • Mafferra L (2011) Interpretaciones del registro arqueobotánico en arqueología histórica. In: Ramos M, Tapia A, Bognanni F, Fernández M, Helfer V, Landa C, Lanza M, Montanari E, Néspolo E, Pineau V (eds) Temas y Problemas de la Arqueología Histórica, vol 1. Universidad Nacional de Luján, Luján, pp 43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinova E, van Loon GJM, De Meyer M, Willems H (2011) Plant economy and land use in Middle Egypt during the late Antique/early islamic period: archaeobotanical analysis of mud bricks and mud plasters from the area of Dayr al Barshā. In: Fahmy AG, Kahlheber S, D’Andrea AC (eds) Windows on the african past: current approaches to african archaeobotany. Reports in african archaeology 3. Africa Magna Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, pp 119–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Morello J, Matteucci SD, Rodríguez AF, Silva ME (2012) Ecorregiones y complejos ecosistémicos argentinos. Orientación Gráfica Editora, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Musaubach MG, Babot M, del Pilar (2019) Elementos para explorar el uso de gramíneas silvestres de ambientes áridos de los Andes Centro Sur: primeras aproximaciones desde los conjuntos fitolíticos de inflorescencias e infrutescencias. Revista del Museo de Antropología 12:57–72. https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v12.n1.20621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann K, Strömberg CAE, Ball T, Albert RM, Vrydaghs L, Scott Cummings L (2019) International Code for Phytolith nomenclature (ICPN) 2.0. Ann Bot 124:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otegui F, Herrera Cano A, Suárez ME (2021) Cenizas wichí: una revisión etnobiológica. Revista del Museo de La Plata - Suplemento Resúmenes (III JAES) 6:164R

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor Quiles M (2017) La construcción con tierra en arqueología: Teoría, método, técnicas y aplicación. Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante, Alicante

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterer NI, Passeggi E, Zucol AF (2011) Análisis fitolíticos de suelos del sudoeste de la provincia de Entre Ríos (Argentina) como una herramienta para comprender sus procesos pedológicos (Phytolith analysis of soils from the southwestern Entre Rios Province (Argentina) as a tool to understand their pedological processes). Revista Mexicana de ciencias geológicas 28:132–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall D (2015) Palaeoethnobotany: a handbook of procedures, 3rd edn. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Diosdado AM (2019) Reconstrucción medioambiental a través del análisis palinológico de adobes del sitio La Joya de San Martín Garabato, Veracruz, México (Preclásico Tardío-Clásico). Tesis que opta el título de licenciada en arqueología, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Ciudad de México

  • Piperno DR (2006) Phytoliths: a Comprehensive Guide for Archaeologists and Paleoecologists. AltaMira Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno DR (2009) Identifying crop plants with phytoliths (and starch grains) in Central and South America: a review and an update of the evidence. Quat Int 193:146–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokorná A, Beneš J (2014) Plant macroremains from the Old Kingdom mud brick construction of the Werkaure tomb. Results of carpological and xylotomical analyses. In: Krejčí J, Kytnarová KA, Vymazalová H, Pokorná A, Beneš J (eds) Abusir XXIV: Mastaba of Werkaure, vol 1: Tombs AC 26 and AC 32 – old Kingdom Strata. Charles University in Prague, Prague, pp 283–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivet MC (2008) Pasado y presente de una ciudad colonial. El caso Ibatín (1565–1685). Arqueología histórica en un espacio doméstico. Tesis de grado inédita, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, San Miguel de Tucumán

  • Rivet MC (2009) El espacio doméstico en la primera San Miguel de Tucumán. Un caso de estudio arqueológico. In: Chiavazza H, Ceruti CN (eds) Arqueología de Ciudades Americanas del Siglo XVI. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras – Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, pp 165–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolón G, Picca P, Rosenfeldt S (2012) Plants used as construction components of vernacular earthen architecture, La Rioja Province, Argentina. In: Correia M, Jerome P, Blondet M, Achenza M (eds) Terra 2012 | 12th SIACOT: Proceedings. 12th SIACOT Iberian-American Seminar on Earthen Architecture and Construction. Editora Argumentum, Lisboa, pp 152–157

  • Rosen AM (1992) Preliminary identification of silica skeletons from near eastern archaeological sites: an anatomical approach. In: Rapp G, Mulholand SC (eds) Phytolith Systematics: emerging issues. Advances in Archaeological and Museum Science, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 129–147

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saiquita V (2020) Entre adoberas y adoberos. Aproximaciones al patrimonio desde las prácticas y saberes (between adoberas and adoberos. Approaches to heritage from practice and knowledge). Revista Gremium 7:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott Cummings L (2007) Phytoliths as artifacts: evidence of threshing on silica bodies. In: Madella M, Zurro D (eds) Plants, people and places: recent studies in phytolithic analysis. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 151–154

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spengler G, Do Campo M, Ratto N (2010) Caracterización de materiales constructivos en tierra mediante estudios de laboratorio. In: Bertolino S, Cattáneo R, Izeta AD (eds) La arqueometría en Argentina y Latinoamérica. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades, Córdoba, pp 311–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasi J, Barada J, Barbarich MF, Veliz N, Saiquita V (2020) Culturas constructivas con tierra en el espacio altoandino. Aproximaciones tecnológicas y sociales desde el norte argentino (Earthen constructive cultures in the high Andean space. Technological and social approaches from northern Argentina). Em Questão 26:261–290. https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245260.261-290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasini A (2008) Esteco el Nuevo. Contribución al estudio de Nuestra Señora de Talavera de Madrid 1609/1692. Ediciones Al Margen, La Plata

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasini A, Alonso RN (2001) Esteco, el viejo. Breve historia y localización de nuestra Señora de Talavera 1566–1609. Gráfica Editora, Salta

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veen M (2007) Formation processes of desiccated and carbonized plant remains – the identification of routine practice. J Archaeol Sci 34:968–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucol AF, Osterrieth ML (2002) Técnicas de preparación de muestras sedimentarias para la extracción de fitolitos. Ameghiniana 39:379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucol AF, Passeggi E, Fernández Honaine M (2005) Análisis fitolíticos: Metodologías básicas y su aplicación a los estudios paleoecológicos. Facultad de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad Autónoma de Entre Ríos, Paraná

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina, Florencia Borsella, Diego Gobbo for the map, Inhabitants of El Shincal & Purmamarca, Anonymous reviewers, the VHA copy editor John Daniell.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aylen Capparelli.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Beneš.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castillón, V., López, M.L., Igareta, A. et al. First identification of plant remains in earthen architecture of Argentina: constructive and domestic archaeological data from early colonial contexts (16th and 17th centuries). Veget Hist Archaeobot 33, 131–146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-023-00962-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-023-00962-w

Keywords

Navigation