Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Breast cancer screening in patients with intermediate risk using contrast-enhanced mammography

  • Commentary
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Commentary to this article was published on 04 July 2023

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jochelson MS, Lobbes MBI (2021) Contrast-enhanced mammography: state of the art. Radiology 299:36–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cozzi A, Magni V, Zanardo M, Schiaffino S, Sardanelli F (2021) Contrast-enhanced mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Radiology 302:568–581

  3. Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG (2011) Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology 258:98–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zanardo M, Cozzi A, Trimboli RM et al (2019) Technique, protocols and adverse reactions for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM): a systematic review. Insights Imaging 10:76

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Saadatmand S, Geuzinge HA, Rutgers EJT et al (2019) MRI versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women with familial risk (FaMRIsc): a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 20:1136–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakker MF, De Lange SV, Pijnappel R et al (2019) Supplemental MRI screening for women with extremely dense breast tissue. N Engl J Med 381:2091–2102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neeter LMFH, Robbe MMQ, Van Nijnatten TJA et al (2023) Comparings the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer 14:174–182

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Geel K, Kok EM, Krol JP et al (2019) Reversal of the hanging protocol of contrast enhanced mammography leads to similar diagnostic performance yet decreased reading times. Eur J Radiol 117:62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Zelst JCM, Vreemann S, Witt HJ et al (2018) Multireader study on the diagnostic accuracy of ultrafast breast magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer screening. Invest Radiol 53:579–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Whelehan P, Evans A, Wells M, Macgillivray S (2013) The effect of mammography pain on repeat participation in breast cancer screening: a systematic review. Breast 22:389–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Keemer-Gels ME, Groenendijk RPR, Van den Heuvel JHM, Boetes C, Peer PGM, Wobbes T (2000) Pain experienced by women attending breast cancer screening. Breast Canc Res Treat 60:235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, P.O. Box 5500, 6130 MD, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands

    Marc B. I. Lobbes

  2. GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands

    Marc B. I. Lobbes

  3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands

    Marc B. I. Lobbes

Authors
  1. Marc B. I. Lobbes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc B. I. Lobbes.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Marc Lobbes.

Conflict of interest

M.L. received speaker’s fees from Hologic, Tromp Medical, Bayer, and Guerbet. M.L. participated in Medical Advisory Boards for Hologic and Bayer.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

NA

Ethical approval

NA

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

NA

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Please also see the second commentary available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09890-9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lobbes, M.B.I. Breast cancer screening in patients with intermediate risk using contrast-enhanced mammography. Eur Radiol 33, 8407–8409 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09889-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09889-2

Search

Navigation