Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography to differentiate intracerebral hemorrhage from contrast extravasation after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Computed Tomography
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess whether dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), using conventional computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging as a reference standard, is sufficiently accurate to differentiate intracerebral hemorrhage from contrast extravasation after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.

Methods

On January 20, 2021, we searched the PubMed Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. QUADAS-2 was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analyses were performed using a bivariate random-effects model. To explore sources of heterogeneity, meta-regression analyses were performed. Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test was used to assess publication bias.

Results

A total of 7 studies (269 patients, 269 focal areas) were included. The pooled mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DECT in identifying intracerebral hemorrhage from contrast extravasation after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke were 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.96), 1 (95% CI 0.86 to 1), and 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 1), respectively. This evidence was of moderate certainty due to the risk of bias. Higgin’s I-squared for study heterogeneity was observed for the pooled sensitivity (I2 = 78.88%) and pooled specificity (I2 = 82.12%). Moreover, Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test revealed no publication bias (p = 0.38).

Conclusion

DECT shows excellent accuracy and specificity in differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage from contrast extravasation after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Nevertheless, there was substantial and moderate heterogeneity among the studies. Future large-scale, prospective cohort studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Key Points

Dual-energy computed tomography shows excellent accuracy and specificity in differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage from contrast extravasation after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.

Via meta-regression analysis, we found various possible covariates, including the publication date, image analysis, index test time, time of follow-up imaging, and reference standard judgment, that had an important effect on the heterogeneity.

There were no concerns regarding applicability in any of the included studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

95% CI:

95% confidence interval

AIS:

Acute ischemic stroke

AUROC:

Area under receiver operating characteristic

BBB:

Blood–brain barrier

CENTRAL:

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials

DECT:

Dual-energy computed tomography

EVT:

Endovascular thrombectomy

Higgin’s I 2 :

Higgins I-squared

HSROC:

Hierarchical summary receiver operating curve

ICH:

Intracranial hemorrhage

QUADAS-2:

Quality assessment for diagnostic studies-2

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

VNC:

Virtual non-contrast

References

  1. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW et al (2018) Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 137:e67–67e492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hui W, Wu C, Zhao W et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of recanalization therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: a systematic review. Stroke 51:2026–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D et al (2015) A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL et al (2016) Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 15:1138–1147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Xie Y, Wang H et al (2020) Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in Chinese ischemic stroke patients: the ASIAN score. Stroke 51:2690–2696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Almqvist H, Holmin S, Mazya MV (2019) Dual energy CT after stroke thrombectomy alters assessment of hemorrhagic complications. Neurology 93:e1068–1068e1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosche B, Macdonald RL (2015) Letter by Bosche and Macdonald regarding article, “Relevance of blood-brain barrier disruption after endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke: dual-energy computed tomographic study”. Stroke 46:e126–e127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Potter CA, Sodickson AD (2016) Dual-energy CT in emergency neuroimaging: added value and novel applications. Radiographics 36:2186–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Si-Mohamed S, Moreau-Triby C, Tylski P et al (2020) Head-to-head comparison of lung perfusion with dual-energy CT and SPECT-CT. Diagn Interv Imaging 101:299–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lazar M, Ringl H, Baltzer P et al (2020) Protocol analysis of dual-energy CT for optimization of kidney stone detection in virtual non-contrast reconstructions. Eur Radiol 30:4295–4305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Iwano S, Kamiya S, Ito R, Nakamura S, Naganawa S (2021) Iodine-related attenuation in contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography in small-sized solid-type lung cancers is associated with the postoperative prognosis. Cancer Imaging 21:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cai J, Zhou Y, Zhao Y et al (2021) Comparison of various reconstructions derived from dual-energy CT immediately after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in predicting hemorrhage. Eur Radiol 31:4419–4427

  13. Zaouak Y, Sadeghi N, Sarbu N, Ligot N, Lubicz B (2020) Differentiation between cerebral hemorrhage and contrast extravasation using dual energy computed tomography after intra-arterial neuro interventional procedures. J Belg Soc Radiol 104:70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Byrne D, Walsh JP, Schmiedeskamp H et al (2020) Prediction of hemorrhage after successful recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke: improved risk stratification using dual-energy CT parenchymal iodine concentration ratio relative to the superior sagittal sinus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41:64–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Phan CM, Yoo AJ, Hirsch JA, Nogueira RG, Gupta R (2012) Differentiation of hemorrhage from iodinated contrast in different intracranial compartments using dual-energy head CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:1088–1094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta R, Phan CM, Leidecker C et al (2010) Evaluation of dual-energy CT for differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage from iodinated contrast material staining. Radiology 257:205–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tijssen MP, Hofman PA, Stadler AA et al (2014) The role of dual energy CT in differentiating between brain haemorrhage and contrast medium after mechanical revascularisation in acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Radiol 24:834–840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonatti M, Lombardo F, Zamboni GA et al (2018) Iodine extravasation quantification on dual-energy CT of the brain performed after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke can predict hemorrhagic complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:441–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morhard D, Ertl L, Gerdsmeier-Petz W, Ertl-Wagner B, Schulte-Altedorneburg G (2014) Dual-energy CT immediately after endovascular stroke intervention: prognostic implications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37:1171–1178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolman DN, Patel BP, Wintermark M, Heit JJ (2018) Dual-energy computed tomography applications in neurointervention. J Comput Assist Tomogr 42:831–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Fletcher JG (2015) Dual- and multi-energy CT: principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications. Radiology 276:637–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Choi Y, Shin NY, Jang J, Ahn KJ, Kim BS (2020) Dual-energy CT for differentiating acute intracranial hemorrhage from contrast staining or calcification: a meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 62:1617–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Renú A, Amaro S, Laredo C et al (2015) Relevance of blood-brain barrier disruption after endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke: dual-energy computed tomographic study. Stroke 46:673–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoon W, Seo JJ, Kim JK, Cho KH, Park JG, Kang HK (2004) Contrast enhancement and contrast extravasation on computed tomography after intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 35:876–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Greer DM, Koroshetz WJ, Cullen S, Gonzalez RG, Lev MH (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging improves detection of intracerebral hemorrhage over computed tomography after intra-arterial thrombolysis. Stroke 35:491–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nikoubashman O, Jablawi F, Dekeyzer S et al (2016) MRI appearance of intracerebral iodinated contrast agents: is it possible to distinguish extravasated contrast agent from hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:1418–1421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Portela de Oliveira E, Chakraborty S, Patel M, Finitsis S, Iancu D (2020) Value of high-density sign on CT images after mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion in predicting hemorrhage and unfavorable outcome. Neuroradiol J 34:120–127

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Liao for her guidance on statistical methods. We are grateful for the advice and discussions with our colleagues Shan Deng and HaiPing Huang as well as the anonymous reviewers.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhijian Liang.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Zhijian Liang.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

Dr. Liao kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript. Two of the authors have significant statistical expertise (Dr. Chen and Dr. Zhang).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was not required because this is a systematic review of published literature.

Methodology

• prospective and retrospective

• multicenter study

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 404 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S., Zhang, J., Quan, X. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography to differentiate intracerebral hemorrhage from contrast extravasation after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 32, 432–441 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08212-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08212-1

Keywords

Navigation