Skip to main content
Log in

Learning curve of liver stiffness measurement using a new hybrid machine composed of transient elastography interfaced with ultrasound

  • Ultrasound
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the learning curve for performing reliable liver stiffness measurements using a new hybrid machine composed of transient elastography (TE) interfaced with an ultrasound device for radiographers and radiologists with different levels of expertise in ultrasound imaging.

Methods

Ten novice operators who had never performed TE measurements were prospectively evaluated from April to October 2018: senior radiologists, young radiologists, fellows, radiographers, and residents, with different levels of experience in abdominal ultrasound imaging. All operators had a short theoretical training followed by a training session under supervision in three patients. Then, each operator had to perform TE in 50 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease, using beforehand ultrasound examination to select measurement area in the right liver lobe, and if needed, the XL probe. Percentages of failures and reliable measurements were compared.

Results

The rates of failures of measurements, poorly reliable, reliable, and very reliable results, were of 4.2% (21/500), 2.4% (12/500), 47.6% (238/500), and 45.8% (229/500), respectively. The rates of reliable plus very reliable results were excellent, ranging from 91 to 96% among all the subgroups. The rates of very reliable, reliable, and unreliable results did not differ between operator subgroups and especially between junior radiologists, senior radiologists, and radiographers. No breaking point was observed in the interquartile range/median values over time.

Conclusion

TE interfaced with ultrasound in this hybrid machine presents no learning curve effect. After a short initial training session, a novice observer is able to perform high rates of reliable and very reliable TE measurements.

Key Points

• When performing liver stiffness measurements using a new hybrid machine composed of transient elastography interfaced with ultrasound, the rate of failures of measurements is very low, below 5%.

• After a short training session and using ultrasound planning, a novice operator, whatever its expertise in ultrasound imaging, is capable of performing high rates of reliable and very reliable measurements.

• No learning curve is needed for performing reliable liver stiffness measurements using this new hybrid machine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

ICC:

Intra-class correlation coefficient

IQR/M:

Interquartile range-to-liver stiffness median ratio

LSM:

Liver stiffness measurement

TE:

Transient elastography

References

  1. Foucher J, Chanteloup E, Vergniol J et al (2006) Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study. Gut 55:403–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Martens S et al (2008) Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 134:960–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vergniol J, Foucher J, Terrebonne E et al (2011) Noninvasive tests for fibrosis and liver stiffness predict 5-year outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 140:1970–9, 9 e1-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J, Barthe C et al (2013) Non-invasive tests for fibrosis and liver stiffness predict 5-year survival of patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 37:979–988

  5. Vergniol J, Boursier J, Coutzac C et al (2014) Evolution of noninvasive tests of liver fibrosis is associated with prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 60:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sandrin L, Catheline S, Tanter M, Hennequin X, Fink M (1999) Time-resolved pulsed elastography with ultrafast ultrasonic imaging. Ultrason Imaging 21:259–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. European Association for the Study of the L (2011) EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol 55:245–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. European Association For The Study Of The L (2012) EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 57:167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Piscaglia F, Salvatore V, Mulazzani L, Cantisani V, Schiavone C (2016) Ultrasound shear wave elastography for liver disease. A critical appraisal of the many actors on the stage. Ultraschall Med 37:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cassinotto C, Lapuyade B, Mouries A et al (2014) Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with impulse elastography: comparison of Supersonic Shear Imaging with ARFI and FibroScan. J Hepatol 61:550–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM et al (2003) Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1705–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Degos F, Perez P, Roche B et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of FibroScan and comparison to liver fibrosis biomarkers in chronic viral hepatitis: a multicenter prospective study (the FIBROSTIC study). J Hepatol 53:1013–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nobili V, Vizzutti F, Arena U et al (2008) Accuracy and reproducibility of transient elastography for the diagnosis of fibrosis in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 48:442–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zarski JP, Sturm N, Guechot J et al (2012) Comparison of nine blood tests and transient elastography for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: the ANRS HCEP-23 study. J Hepatol 56:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boursier J, Zarski JP, de Lédinghen V et al (2013) Determination of reliability criteria for liver stiffness evaluation by transient elastography. Hepatology 57:1182–1191

  16. Molinari N, Morena M, Cristol JP, Daurè JP (2002) Free knot splines for biochemical data. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 67:163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kettaneh A, Marcellin P, Douvin C et al (2007) Features associated with success rate and performance of FibroScan measurements for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in HCV patients: a prospective study of 935 patients. J Hepatol 46:628–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boursier J, Konate A, Guilluy M et al (2008) Learning curve and interobserver reproducibility evaluation of liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:693–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH et al (2010) Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology 51:828–835

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pang JX, Pradhan F, Zimmer S et al (2014) The feasibility and reliability of transient elastography using Fibroscan(R): a practice audit of 2335 examinations. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J, Foucher J, El-Hajbi F, Merrouche W, Rigalleau V (2010) Feasibility of liver transient elastography with FibroScan using a new probe for obese patients. Liver Int 30:1043–1048

  22. Myers RP, Pomier-Layrargues G, Kirsch R et al (2012) Feasibility and diagnostic performance of the FibroScan XL probe for liver stiffness measurement in overweight and obese patients. Hepatology 55:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Armstrong MJ, Corbett C, Hodson J et al (2013) Operator training requirements and diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan in routine clinical practice. Postgrad Med J 89:685–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Cassinotto.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Christophe Cassinotto.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors has significant statistical expertise (Dr Molinari Nicolas).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• Prospective

• Observational

• Performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cassinotto, C., Pierredon-Foulongne, MA., Belgour, A. et al. Learning curve of liver stiffness measurement using a new hybrid machine composed of transient elastography interfaced with ultrasound. Eur Radiol 30, 1088–1095 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06388-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06388-1

Keywords

Navigation