Correction to: European Radiology

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06185-w

The original version of this article, published on 02 May 2019, unfortunately contained a mistake. The following correction has therefore been made in the original: The presentation of Fig. 2 was incorrect. The corrected figure is given below.

Fig. 2
figure 1

Forest plot of the 56 analyzed studies, for a total of 64 independent study parts. Heterogeneity among studies was very high (I2 = 92%). The last row shows the pooled extracellular volume obtained using the random effects model