Abstract
Objectives
There is potential for high radiation exposure during neurointerventional procedures. Increasing regulatory requirements mandate dose monitoring of patients and staff, and justification of high levels of radiation exposure. This paper demonstrates the potential to use radiation dose-tracking software to establish local diagnostic reference levels.
Methods
Consecutive neurointerventional procedures, performed in a single institution within a one-year period, were retrospectively studied. Dose area product (DAP) data were collected using dose-tracking software and clinical data obtained from a prospectively generated patient treatment database.
Results
Two hundred and sixty-four procedures met the selection criteria. Median DAP was 100 Gy.cm2 for aneurysm coiling procedures, 259 Gy.cm2 for arteriovenous malformation (AVM) embolisation procedures, 87 Gy.cm2 for stroke thrombolysis/thrombectomy, and 74 Gy.cm2 for four-vessel angiography. One hundred and nine aneurysm coiling procedures were further studied. Six significant variables were assessed using stepwise regression analysis to determine effect on DAP. Aneurysm location (anterior vs posterior circulation) had the single biggest effect (p = 0.004).
Conclusions
This paper confirms variable radiation exposures during neurointerventional procedures. The 75th percentile (used to define diagnostic reference levels) of DAP measurements represents a reasonable guidance metric for monitoring purposes. Results indicate that aneurysm location has the greatest impact on dose during coiling procedures and that anterior and posterior circulation coiling procedures should have separate diagnostic reference levels.
Key Points
• Dose-tracking software is useful for monitoring patient radiation dose during neurointerventional procedures
• This paper provides a template for methodology applicable to any interventional suite
• Local diagnostic reference levels were defined by using the 75th percentile of DAP as per International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations
• Aneurysm location is the biggest determinant of radiation dose during coiling procedures.
• Anterior and posterior circulation coiling procedures should have separate diagnostic reference levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AVM:
-
Arteriovenous malformation
- DAP:
-
Dose-area product
- DRL:
-
Diagnostic reference level
- IAEA:
-
International Atomic Energy Agency
- IRCP:
-
International Commission on Radiological Protection
References
Lin N, Cahill KS, Frerichs KU, Friedlander RM, Claus EB (2012) Treatment of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the USA: a paradigm shift. J Neurointerv Surg 4:182–189
Miller DL, Balter S, Schueler BA, Wagner LK, Strauss KJ, Vano E (2010) Clinical radiation management for fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. Radiology 257:321–332
Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB et al (2009) Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:S263–S273
Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE et al (2003) Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part II: skin dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:977–990
Authors on behalf of ICRP, Stewart FA, Akleyev AV et al (2012) ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs—threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 41:1–322
Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Available via: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/CELEX-32013L0059-EN-TXT.pdf
Broughton J, Cantone MC, Ginjaume M, Shah B, Czarwinski R (2015) Implications in dosimetry of the implementation of the revised dose limit to the lens of the eye. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 164:70–74
Seals KF, Lee EW, Cagnon CH, Al-Hakim RA, Kee ST (2016) Radiation-induced cataractogenesis: a critical literature review for the interventional radiologist. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39:151–160
Kirova G, Georgiev E, Zasheva C, St Georges A (2015) Dose tracking and radiology department management. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 165:62–66
Alexander MD, Oliff MC, Olorunsola OG, Brus-Ramer M, Nickoloff EL, Meyers PM (2010) Patient radiation exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic interventional neuroradiology procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 2:6–10
Rehani MM, Frush DP, Berris T, Einstein AJ (2012) Patient radiation exposure tracking: worldwide programs and needs—results from the first IAEA survey. Eur J Radiol 81:e968–e976
Kemerink GJ, Frantzen MJ, Oei K et al (2002) Patient and occupational dose in neurointerventional procedures. Neuroradiology 44:522–528
Bor D, Cekirge S, Turkay T et al (2005) Patient and staff doses in interventional neuroradiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 117:62–68
Sanchez RM, Vano E, Fernandez JM, Moreu M, Lopez-Ibor L (2014) Brain radiation doses to patients in an interventional neuroradiology laboratory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:1276–1280
Faulkner K, Christofides S, Lillicrap S, Horton P, Malone J (2012) Criteria for the acceptability of radiological equipment. Radiation protection no. 162. European Union, Luxembourg
Balter S, Miller D, Vano E et al (2008) A pilot study exploring the possibility of establishing guidance levels in x-ray directed interventional procedures. Med Phys 35:673–680
Balter S, Rosenstein M, Miller DL, Schueler B, Spelic D (2011) Patient radiation dose audits for fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. Med Phys 38:1611–1618
ICRP (2017) Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. ICRP Publication 135. Ann ICRP 46(1)
Aroua A, Rickli H, Stauffer JC et al (2007) How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level. Eur Radiol 17:1621–1633
Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE et al (2003) Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I: overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:711–727
IAEA (2013) Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in medical imaging. Available via: https://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/InformationFor/HealthProfessionals/1_Radiology/Optimization/diagnostic-reference-levels.htm. Accessed 13 Nov 17
Kwon D, Little MP, Miller DL (2011) Reference air kerma and kerma-area product as estimators of peak skin dose for fluoroscopically guided interventions. Med Phys 38:4196–4204
Fleetwood IG, Steinberg GK (2002) Arteriovenous malformations. Lancet 359:863–873
Berman MF, Sciacca RR, Pile-Spellman J et al (2000) The epidemiology of brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 47:389–396 discussion 397
Villablanca JP, Achiriolaie A, Hooshi P et al (2005) Aneurysms of the posterior circulation: detection and treatment planning using volume-rendered three-dimensional helical computerized tomography angiography. J Neurosurg 103:1018–1029
Villablanca JP, Duckwiler GR, Jahan R et al (2013) Natural history of asymptomatic unruptured cerebral aneurysms evaluated at CT angiography: growth and rupture incidence and correlation with epidemiologic risk factors. Radiology 269:258–265
Schievink WI, Wijdicks EF, Piepgras DG, Chu CP, O'Fallon WM, Whisnant JP (1995) The poor prognosis of ruptured intracranial aneurysms of the posterior circulation. J Neurosurg 82:791–795
Fischer S, Vajda Z, Aguilar Perez M et al (2012) Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 54:369–382
Miller DKD, Bonavia G (2009) Reference levels of patient radiation doses in interventional radiology. Radiology 253:753–764
Johnson PB, Borrego D, Balter S, Johnson K, Siragusa D, Bolch WE (2011) Skin dose mapping for fluoroscopically guided interventions. Med Phys 38:5490–5499
(2017) EUCLID—European study on clinical diagnostic reference levels for X-ray medical imaging. ESR EuroSafe Imaging. Available via: http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/euclid
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Owen J O’Connor.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise (C.O’T.).
Informed consent
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Methodology
• retrospective
• observational
• performed at one institution
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Acton, H., James, K., Kavanagh, R.G. et al. Monitoring neurointerventional radiation doses using dose-tracking software: implications for the establishment of local diagnostic reference levels. Eur Radiol 28, 3669–3675 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5405-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5405-3