Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) density as a prognostic factor for percutaneous ablation of pulmonary colorectal metastases

  • Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) density and other clinicopathological factors for percutaneous ablation of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer.

Methods

CEA density was calculated as: “absolute serum CEA pre-ablation/volume of all lung metastases [mm3]”. Median CEA density was the cut-off for high and low groups. Cox-regression was used to determine prognostic factors for survival.

Results

A total of 85 patients (102 ablation sessions) were followed for a median of 27 months. High CEA density was significantly associated with worse overall survival compared to low CEA density (adjusted HR: 2.12; 95 % CI: 1.22–3.70, p=0.002; median survival: 25.7 vs. 44.3 months). The interval between primary resection of the colorectal carcinoma and first ablation was also a prognostic factor, a duration >24 months being associated with better survival compared to a shorter interval (0–24 months) (adjusted HR: 0.55; 95 % CI: 0.31–0.98, p=0.04). Moreover, a disease-free interval >24 months was significantly associated with low CEA density compared to a shorter interval (0–24 months) (adjusted OR: 0.29; 95 % CI: 0.11–0.77, p=0.01).

Conclusions

Serum CEA density and interval between primary resection of a colorectal carcinoma and pulmonary ablation are independent prognostic factors for overall survival. In two patients with identical CEA serum levels, the patient with the lower/smaller pulmonary tumour load would have a worse prognosis than the one with the higher/larger pulmonary metastases.

Key Points

• CEA density is an independent prognostic factor for colorectal pulmonary metastases.

• A lower CEA density is associated with better overall survival.

• CEA may play a functional role in tumour progression.

• High CEA density is associated with smaller tumours.

• Interval between pulmonary ablation and primary colorectal carcinoma is a prognostic factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen CL, Scott WJ, Goldberg M (2006) Radiofrequency ablation of lung malignancies. Ann Thorac Surg 82(1):365–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang L, Han Y, Zhao J et al (2011) Is radiofrequency thermal ablation a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of pulmonary malignancies? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 39(3):348–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iizasa T, Suzuki M, Yoshida S et al (2006) Prediction of prognosis and surgical indications for pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 82(1):254–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanemitsu Y, Kato T, Hirai T, Yasui K (2004) Preoperative probability model for predicting overall survival after resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91(1):112–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kobayashi K, Kawamura M, Ishihara T (1999) Surgical treatment for both pulmonary and hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118(6):1090–1096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vogelsang H, Haas S, Hierholzer C, Berger U, Siewert JR, Präuer H (2004) Factors influencing survival after resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91(8):1066–1071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watanabe I, Arai T, Ono M et al (2003) Prognostic factors in resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 90(11):1436–1440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Welter S, Jacobs J, Krbek T, Poettgen C, Stamatis G (2007) Prognostic impact of lymph node involvement in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 31(2):167–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DeMatteo RM, Minnard EA, Kemeney N. Surgical resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. Paper presented at: Proceedings of ASCO1999

  10. Higashiyama M, Kodama K, Higaki N et al (2003) Surgery for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 51(7):289–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ike H, Shimada H, Ohki S, Togo S, Yamaguchi S, Ichikawa Y (2002) Results of aggressive resection of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma detected by intensive follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 45(4):468–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JM, Jin GY, Goldberg SN et al (2004) Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Inoperable Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer and Metastases: Preliminary Report 1. Radiology 230(1):125–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Melloni G, Doglioni C, Bandiera A et al (2006) Prognostic factors and analysis of microsatellite instability in resected pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 81(6):2008–2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiono S, Ishii G, Nagai K et al (2005) Histopathologic prognostic factors in resected colorectal lung metastases. Ann Thorac Surg 79(1):278–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore KH, McCaughan BC (2001) Surgical resection for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 71(3):143–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakagoe T, Sawai T, Ayabe H et al (2000) Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in tumor tissue of patients with colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 21(4B):3031–3036

  17. Sfoungaristos S, Perimenis P (2012) PSA density is superior than PSA and Gleason score for adverse pathologic features prediction in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 6(1):46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chua TC, Al-Alem I, Zhao J, Glenn D, Liauw W, Morris DL (2012) Radiofrequency ablation of concomitant and recurrent pulmonary metastases after surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 19(1):75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hublet A, Wijtenburg E, Lismonde M et al (2009) Feasibility of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary malignancies in the hands of the surgeon. Acta Chir Belg 110(3):267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koelblinger C, Strauss S, Gillams A (2014) Outcome after radiofrequency ablation of sarcoma lung metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37(1):147–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kayser K, Zink S, André S et al (2002) Primary colorectal carcinomas and their intrapulmonary metastases: Clinical, glyco-, immuno-and lectin histochemical, nuclear and syntactic structure analysis with emphasis on correlation with period of occurrence of metastases and survival. APMIS 110(6):435–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Duffy MJ (2001) Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful? Clin Chem 47(4):624–630

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Timmerman RD, Bizekis CS, Pass HI et al (2009) Local surgical, ablative, and radiation treatment of metastases. CA Cancer J Clin 59(3):145–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Steinke K, Glenn D, King J et al (2004) Percutaneous imaging–guided radiofrequency ablation in patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases: 1-year follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol 11(2):207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bajenova O, Chaika N, Tolkunova E et al (2014) Carcinoembryonic antigen promotes colorectal cancer progression by targeting adherens junction complexes. Exp Cell Res 324(2):115–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pignatelli M, Durbin H, Bodmer WF (1990) Carcinoembryonic antigen functions as an accessory adhesion molecule mediating colon epithelial cell-collagen interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87(4):1541–1545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hakim AA (1984) Carcinoembryonic antigen, a tumour-associated glycoprotein induces defective lymphocyte function. Neoplasma 31(4):385–397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hakim AA, Siraki CM, Joseph CE (1983) Carcinoembryonic antigen from human malignant melanoma cells. I. Production and shedding characteristics. Annales D'immunologie 134d(3):319–331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Medoff JR, Jegasothy BV, Roche JK (1984) Carcinoembryonic antigen-induced release of a suppressor factor from normal human lymphocytes in vitro. Cancer Res 44(12 Pt 1):5822–5827

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rena O, Casadio C, Viano F et al (2002) Pulmonary resection for metastases from colorectal cancer: factors influencing prognosis. Twenty-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21(5):906–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Garetto I, Busso M, Sardo D et al (2014) Radiofrequency ablation of thoracic tumours: lessons learned with ablation of 100 lesions. La Radiol Med 119(1):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li X, Wang J, Li W et al (2012) Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma pulmonary metastases. Int J Hyperth 28(8):721–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu Q, Cao W, Huang L et al (2012) CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of pulmonary malignancies: Results in 69 cases. World J Surg Oncol 10(1):80

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Okuma T, Matsuoka T, Yamamoto A et al (2010) Determinants of local progression after computed tomography-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for unresectable lung tumours: 9-year experience in a single institution. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33(4):787–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gillams A, Khan Z, Osborn P, Lees W (2013) Survival after radiofrequency ablation in 122 patients with inoperable colorectal lung metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36(3):724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Boame N, Gresham G, Jonker D, Martel G, Balaa F, Asmis T (2014) Use of chemotherapy and radiofrequency ablation to treat colorectal cancer metastases: a retrospective review of The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre over 7 years. Curr Oncol 21(4), e557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee W-S, Yun SH, Chun H-K et al (2007) Pulmonary resection for metastases from colorectal cancer: prognostic factors and survival. Int J Color Dis 22(6):699–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Professor David Morris. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.The authors state that this work has not received any funding. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board as it was a retrospective study. Approval from the institutional animal care committee was not required because no animals were involved in this study. Study subjects or cohorts have not been previously reported. Methodology: retrospective, observational, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Morris.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PNG 147 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 161 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huo, Y.R., Glenn, D., Liauw, W. et al. Evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) density as a prognostic factor for percutaneous ablation of pulmonary colorectal metastases. Eur Radiol 27, 128–137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4352-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4352-0

Keywords

Navigation