Skip to main content
Log in

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for staging liver fibrosis is less reliable in the presence of fat and iron

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for staging liver fibrosis in the presence of fat and iron.

Methods

Ninety-five patients, including 48 men and 47 women, aged 57.0 ± 14.2 years, underwent liver biopsy. Ninety-six samples were histologically staged for liver fibrosis (0-Ishak score 0; 1-Ishak score 1–4; 2-Ishak score 5–6) and semiquantitatively graded for hepatic iron (0, no; 1, low; 2, moderate; 3, high iron) and for hepatic steatosis. Within 72 h after biopsy, navigator-triggered DW-MRI using b-values of 50/400/800 s/mm2 was performed in a 1.5-T system, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) were analysed. ADCs were correlated with fibrosis stage, steatosis grade, and iron grade using linear regression.

Results

ADC did not correlate with fibrosis stages in either the overall group (n = 96; R 2 = 0.38; P = 0.17) or in the subgroup without liver iron and steatosis (n = 40; R 2 = 0.01; P = 0.75). ADC decreased significantly with steatosis grade in cases without iron and fibrosis (n = 42; R 2 = 0.28; ß = -5.3; P < 0.001). Liver iron was modestly correlated with ADC in patients without fibrosis and steatosis (n = 33; R 2 = 0.29; P = 0.04), whereas high iron concentrations were associated with low ADC values (group 3: β = -489; P = 0.005; reference:group 0) but intermediate levels were not (group 1/group 2: P = 0.93/P = 0.54; reference group: 0).

Conclusions

ADC values are confounded by fat and iron. However, even in patients without fat or iron, DW-MRI does not adequately discriminate the stage of fibrosis.

Key Points

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is increasingly used to evaluate liver disease.

DWI using b-values of 50/400/800 s/mm 2 does not adequately quantify fibrosis.

Assessment of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is confounded by fat and iron.

Fat may influence ADCs by altering water diffusion.

Iron may influence ADCs by signal decay and noise floor effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colombo M, de Franchis R, Del Ninno E, Sangiovanni A, De Fazio C, Tommasini M, Donato MF, Piva A, Di Carlo V et al (1991) Hepatocellular carcinoma in Italian patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 325:675–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thampanitchawong P, Piratvisuth T (1999) Liver biopsy: complications and risk factors. World J Gastroenterol 5:301–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perrault J, McGill DB, Ott BJ, Taylor WF (1978) Liver biopsy: complications in 1000 inpatients and outpatients. Gastroenterology 74:103–106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, Bruckert E, Grimaldi A, Capron F, Poynard T et al (2005) Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 128:1898–1906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratziu V, Bugianesi E, Dixon J, Fassio E, Ekstedt M, Charlotte F, Kechagias S, Poynard T, Olsson R (2007) Histological progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a critical reassessment based on liver sampling variability. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 26:821–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ong TZ, Tan HJ (2003) Ultrasonography is not reliable in diagnosing liver cirrhosis in clinical practice. Singap Med J 44:293–295

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Lelio A, Cestari C, Lomazzi A, Beretta L (1989) Cirrhosis: diagnosis with sonographic study of the liver surface. Radiology 172:389–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Ambrosini R, Lagalla R, Carriero A, Midiri M, Vilgrain V (2007) Cirrhosis: CT and MR imaging evaluation. Eur J Radiol 61:57–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Godfrey EM, Patterson AJ, Priest AN, Davies SE, Joubert I, Krishnan AS, Griffin N, Shaw AS, Alexander GJ et al (2012) A comparison of MR elastography and (31)P MR spectroscopy with histological staging of liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2527-x

  10. Kim KA, Park M-S, Kim I-S, Kiefer B, Chung W-S, Kim M-J, Kim KW (2012) Quantitative evaluation of liver cirrhosis using T1 relaxation time with 3 Tesla MRI before and after oxygen inhalation. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.1002/jmri.23620

  11. Bonekamp S, Torbenson MS, Kamel IR (2011) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis. J Clin Gastroenterol 45:885–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bakan AA, Inci E, Bakan S, Gokturk S, Cimilli T (2011) Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol 22:682–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Grimm RC, Rossman PJ, Fidler JL, Ehman RL (2007) Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1207–1213.e2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huwart L, Peeters F, Sinkus R, Annet L, Salameh N, ter Beek LC, Horsmans Y, Van Beers BE (2006) Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography. NMR Biomed 19:173–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu X-F, Liu B, Qian Y-F, Zhang C, Yu Y-Q (2008) A pilot study of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging in a rabbit model. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 16:500–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu N-Y, Chen K-M, Chai W-M, Li W-X, Du L-J (2008) Feasibility of diagnosing and staging liver fibrosis with diffusion weighted imaging. Chin Med Sci J 23:183–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandrasegaran K, Akisik FM, Lin C, Tahir B, Rajan J, Saxena R, Aisen AM (2009) Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Am J Roentgenol 193:1556–1560. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Annet L, Peeters F, Abarca-Quinones J, Leclercq I, Moulin P, Van Beers BE (2007) Assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in liver fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:122–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruegel M, Holzapfel K, Gaa J, Woertler K, Waldt S, Kiefer B, Stemmer A, Ganter C, Rummeny EJ (2008) Characterization of focal liver lesions by ADC measurements using a respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MR imaging technique. Eur Radiol 18:477–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, Tang Y, Takahashi M (1997) Focal liver masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 204:739–744

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Taouli B, Martin AJ, Qayyum A, Merriman RB, Vigneron D, Yeh BM, Coakley FV (2004) Parallel imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:677–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Do RKG, Chandarana H, Chandanara H, Felker E, Hajdu CH, Babb JS, Kim D, Taouli B (2010) Diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis with diffusion-weighted imaging: value of normalized apparent diffusion coefficient using the spleen as reference organ. Am J Roentgenol 195:671–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Poyraz AK, Onur MR, Kocakoç E, Oğur E (2011) Diffusion-weighted MRI of fatty liver. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.1002/jmri.23519

  24. Lee JT, Liau J, Murphy P, Schroeder ME, Sirlin CB, Bydder M (2012) Cross-sectional investigation of correlation between hepatic steatosis and IVIM perfusion on MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 30:572–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. St Pierre TG, Clark PR, Chua-anusorn W, Fleming AJ, Jeffrey GP, Olynyk JK, Pootrakul P, Robins E, Lindeman R (2005) Noninvasive measurement and imaging of liver iron concentrations using proton magnetic resonance. Blood 105:855–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, Callea F, De Groote J, Gudat F, Denk H, Desmet V, Korb G et al (1995) Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 22:696–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kühn JP, Evert M, Friedrich N, Kannengiesser S, Mayerle J, Thiel R, Lerch MM, Dombrowski F, Mensel B et al (2011) Noninvasive quantification of hepatic fat content using three-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging with correction for T2* relaxation effects. Invest Radiol 46:783–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Soylu A, Kiliçkesmez O, Poturoğlu S, Dolapçioğlu C, Serez K, Sevindir I, Yaşar N, Akyildiz M, Kumbasar B (2010) Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic active hepatitis. Diagn Interv Radiol 16:204–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Le Bihan D (1995) Molecular diffusion, tissue microdynamics and microstructure. NMR Biomed 8:375–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Le Bihan D, Turner R, Douek P, Patronas N (1992) Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:591–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim YK, Lee MW, Lee WJ, Kim SH, Rhim H, Lim JH, Choi D, Kim Y-S, Jang KM et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of diffusion-weighted and of gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MR imaging alone or in combination in the detection of small liver metastasis (≤ 1.5 cm in diameter). Invest Radiol 47:159–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kenis C, Deckers F, De Foer B, Van Mieghem F, Van Laere S, Pouillon M (2012) Diagnosis of liver metastases: can diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) be used as a stand alone sequence? Eur J Radiol 81:1016–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yuan Z, Ye X-D, Dong S, Xu L-C, Xu X-Y, Liu S-Y, Xiao X-S (2010) Role of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating response after chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 75:e9–e14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Morisaka H, Sano K, Wakayama T, Araki T (2012) Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of the liver: Which affects more on apparent diffusion coefficient changes of cirrhosis and liver lesions, D or D*? ISMRM, 20th ed. Melbourne

  35. Hernando D, Karampinos DC, King KF, Haldar JP, Majumdar S, Georgiadis JG, Liang Z-P (2011) Removal of olefinic fat chemical shift artifact in diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 65:692–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tonan T, Fujimoto K, Qayyum A, Kawaguchi T, Kawaguchi A, Nakashima O, Okuda K, Hayabuchi N, Sata M (2012) Quantification of hepatic iron concentration in chronic viral hepatitis: usefulness of T2-weighted single-shot spin-echo echo-planar MR imaging. PLoS One 7:e33868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Qayyum A (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: concepts and applications. Radiographics 29:1797–1810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Naganawa S, Sato C, Nakamura T, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, Maruyama K, Takizawa O (2005) Diffusion-weighted images of the liver: comparison of tumor detection before and after contrast enhancement with superparamagnetic iron oxide. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:836–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Robin Bülow and Jens-Peter Kühn contributed equally to this work.

Some of subjects were prospectively enrolled in another study: “Kühn JP, Evert M, Friedrich N, et al. (2011) Noninvasive quantification of hepatic fat content using three-echo dixon magnetic resonance imaging with correction for T2* relaxation effects. Invest Radiol 46:783-9. PubMed PMID: 21808200”. In this prospective study, we investigated a chemical shift-encoded MRI for liver fat quantification compared to histology. In the present study, retrospective data evaluation was performed to assess liver fibrosis using diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Bülow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bülow, R., Mensel, B., Meffert, P. et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for staging liver fibrosis is less reliable in the presence of fat and iron. Eur Radiol 23, 1281–1287 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2700-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2700-2

Keywords

Navigation