Skip to main content
Log in

Sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of left ventricular function and mass in patients with mitral regurgitation: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative values of left ventricular (LV) function and muscle mass in patients with mitral regurgitation are independent predictors of cardiac morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate whether 64-MDCT can assess the LV function in patients with mitral regurgitation with high accuracy when compared with the MRI and echocardiography results. Fifty-one patients with mitral regurgitation underwent retrospectively ECG-gated 64-MDCT, echocardiography, and MRI for assessing the global ventricular function. End-diastolic and end-systolic volume, stroke volume, ejection fraction, and mass were measured on 64-MDCT and echocardiography, and compared with the results measured on MRI which served as the reference standard. Intertechnique agreement was tested by using Pearson’s correlation and Bland–Altman analyses. No significant differences were revealed in calculated LV function and mass between the 64-MDCT and MRI (paired t test, p = 0.07–0.53). Pearson’s correlation analysis showed the functional parameters and mass correlated closely between the 64-MDCT and MRI (r = 0.89–0.96, p < 0.001). When compared with MRI, echocardiography underestimated the volumetric parameters of LV (paired t test, p = 0.0003–0.004), but significantly overestimated the EF values (p = 0.003), and moderate correlations of functional parameters were obtained (r = 0.78, 0.60, 0.81, and 0.62, respectively). ECG-gated 64-MDCT allows for accurate and reliable assessment of LV function in patients with mitral regurgitation, whereas LV volumes measured by two-dimensional echocardiography were underestimated and the ejection fraction was overestimated when compared with those achieved by using MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carabello BA, Crawford FA Jr (1997) Valvular heart disease. N Engl J Med 337:32–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomson HL, Enriquez-sarano M, Tajik J (2001) Timing of surgery in patients with chronic severe mitral regurgitation. Cardiol Rev 9:137–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones EC, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Liu JE, Fishman D, Lee ET, Welty TK, Fabsitz RR, Howard BV (2001) Prevalence and correlates of mitral regurgitation in a population-based sample (the strong heart study). Am J Cardiol 87:298–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yiu SF, Enriquez-Sarano M, Tribouilloy C, Seward JB, Tajik AJ (2000) Determinants of the degree of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: a quantitative clinical study. Circulation 102:1400–1406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dini FL, Conti U, Fontanive P, Andreini D, Banti S, Braccini L, De Tommasi SM (2007) Right ventricular dysfunction is a major predictor of outcome in patients with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction. Am Heart J 154:172–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, Salm LP, de Roos A, van der Wall EE (2007) Assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with 16-slice multi-slice computed tomography: comparison with 2D-echocardiography. Int J Cardiol 116:201–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, Garcia A, Ferketich AK (2006) Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 151:736–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S, Toyoda H, Nishina T, Ohba M, Hosokawa R, Kimura T, Tamaki N, Komeda M, Kita T, Konishi J (2005) Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology 234:381–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu YW, Tadamura E, Kanao S, Yamamuro M, Okayama S, Ozasa N, Toma M, Kimura T, Kita T, Marui A, Komeda M, Togashi K (2008) Left ventricular functional analysis using 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with left ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Cardiology 109:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vogel-Claussen J, Pannu H, Spevak PJ, Fishman EK, Bluemke DA (2006) Cardiac valve assessment with MR imaging and 64-section multi-detector row CT. Radiographics 26:1769–1784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Quinones MA, Otto CM, Storddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA (2002) Doppler quantification task force of the nomenclature and standards committee of the american society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:167–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, Grayburn PA, Kraft CD, Levine RA, Nihoyannopoulos P, Otto CM, Quinones MA, Rakowski H, Stewart WJ, Waggoner A, Weissman NJ, American Society of Echocardiography (2003) Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 13:777–802

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Enriquez-Sarano M, Avierinos JF, Messika-Zeitoun D, Detaint D, Capps M, Nkomo V, Scott C, Schaff HV, Tajik AJ (2005) Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 352:875–883

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenhek R, Rader F, Klaar U, Gabriel H, Krejc M, Kalbeck D, Schemper M, Maurer G, Baumgartner H (2006) Outcome of watchful waiting in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation 113:2238–2244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Juilliere Y, Barbier G, Feldmann L (1997) Additional predictive value of both left and right ventricular ejection fractions on long-term survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 18:276–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Avierinos JF, Gersh BJ, Melton LJ 3rd, Bailey KR, Shub C, Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ, Enriquez-Sarano M (2002) Natural history of asymptomatic mitral valve prolapse in the community. Circulation 106:1355–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandstede J, Lipke C, Beer M, Hofmann S, Pabst T, Kenn W, Neubauer S, Hahn D (2000) Age- and gender-specific differences in left and right ventricular function and mass determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 10:438–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Collins P, Klein HU, Pennell DJ (2002) Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 90:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pujadas S, Reddy GP, Weber O, Lee JJ, Higgins CB (2004) MR imaging assessment of cardiac function. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:789–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Qin JX, Jones M, Shiota T, Greenberg NL, Tsujino H, Firstenberg MS, Gupta PC, Zetts AD, Xu Y, Ping Sun J, Cardon LA, Odabashian JA, Flamm SD, White RD, Panza JA, Thomas JD (2000) Validation of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for quantifying left ventricular volumes in the presence of a left ventricular aneurysm: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:900–907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, Niel J, Ebner C, Steringer-Mascherbauer R, Schmidt F, Galuschky C, Schummers G, Lang RM, Nesser HJ (2006) Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation 114:654–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alkadhi H, Bettex D, Wildermuth S, Baumert B, Plass A, Grunenfelder J, Desbiolles L, Marincek B, Boehm T (2003) Dynamic cine imaging of the mitral valve with 16-MDCT: a feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol 185:636–646

    Google Scholar 

  24. Flohr TG, Schoepf UJ, Kuettner A, Halliburton S, Bruder H, Suess C, Schmidt B, Hofmann L, Yucel EK, Schaller S, Ohnesorge BM (2003) Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems. Acad Radiol 10:386–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-gang Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, Yk., Yang, Zg., Ning, G. et al. Sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of left ventricular function and mass in patients with mitral regurgitation: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 19, 2107–2116 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1392-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1392-8

Keywords

Navigation