Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Electron beam tomography (EBT) has been used for cardiac diagnosis and the quantitative assessment of coronary calcium since the late 1980s. The introduction of mechanical multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) scanners with shorter rotation times opened new possibilities of cardiac imaging with conventional CT scanners. The purpose of this work was to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the performance for EBT and MSCT for the task of coronary artery calcium imaging as a function of acquisition protocol, heart rate, spiral reconstruction algorithm (where applicable) and calcium scoring method. A cardiac CT semi-anthropomorphic phantom was designed and manufactured for the investigation of all relevant image quality parameters in cardiac CT. This phantom includes various test objects, some of which can be moved within the anthropomorphic phantom in a manner that mimics realistic heart motion. These tools were used to qualitatively and quantitatively demonstrate the accuracy of coronary calcium imaging using typical protocols for an electron beam (Evolution C-150XP, Imatron, South San Francisco, Calif.) and a 0.5-s four-slice spiral CT scanner (Sensation 4, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). A special focus was put on the method of quantifying coronary calcium, and three scoring systems were evaluated (Agatston, volume, and mass scoring). Good reproducibility in coronary calcium scoring is always the result of a combination of high temporal and spatial resolution; consequently, thin-slice protocols in combination with retrospective gating on MSCT scanners yielded the best results. The Agatston score was found to be the least reproducible scoring method. The hydroxyapatite mass, being better reproducible and comparable on different scanners and being a physical quantitative measure, appears to be the method of choice for future clinical studies. The hydroxyapatite mass is highly correlated to the Agatston score. The introduced phantoms can be used to quantitatively assess the performance characteristics of, for example, different scanners, reconstruction algorithms, and quantification methods in cardiac CT. This is especially important for quantitative tasks, such as the determination of the amount of calcium in the coronary arteries, to achieve high and constant quality in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2a–c.
Fig. 3a, b.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5a, b.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (1999) The World Health Report 1999: making a difference. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy J (1982) Complications associated with cardiac catheterization and angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 8:5–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Rourke R, Brundage B, Froelicher V, Greenland P, Grundy S, Hachamovitch R, Pohost G, Shaw L, Weintraub W, Winters JWL (2000) American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus Document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:326–340

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Little W, Constantinescu M, Applegate R, Kutcher M, Burrows M, Kahl F, Santamore W (1988) Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation 78:1157–1166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ambrose J, Fuster V (1998) The risk of coronary occlusion is not proportional to the prior severity of coronary stenoses. Heart 79:34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arad Y, Spadaro L, Goodman K, Newstein D, Guerci A (2000) Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1253–1260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raggi P, Callister T, Cooil B, He Z, Lippolis N, Russo D, Zelinger A, Mahmarian J (2000) Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation 101:850–855

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wexler L, Brundage B, Crouse J, Detrano R, Fuster V, Maddahi J, Rumberger J, Stanford W, White R, Taubert K (1996) Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. Circulation 94:1175–1192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stanford W, Thompson B, Weiss R (1993) Coronary artery calcification: clinical significance and current methods of detection. Am J Roentgenol 161:1139–1146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Agatston A, Janowitz W, Hildner F, Zusmer N, Viamonte M, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bielak L, Sheedy n PF, Peyser P (2001) Coronary artery calcification measured at electron-beam CT: agreement in dual scan runs and change over time. Radiology 218:22–49

    Google Scholar 

  12. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Mohlenkamp S, Schmermund A, Muschiol G, Groth J, Kusus M, Regenfus M, Daniel W, Erbel R, Moshage W (2001) Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 87:210–213

    Google Scholar 

  13. Becker C, Knez A, Ohnesorge B, Schöpf U, Flohr T, Bruening R, Haberl R, Reiser M (2000) Visualization and quantification of coronary calcifications with electron beam and spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 10:629–635

    Google Scholar 

  14. Devries S, Wolfkiel C, Shah V, Chomka E, Rich S (1995) Reproducibility of the measurement of coronary calcium with ultrafast computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 75:973–975

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hernigou A, Challande P, Boudeville J, Séné V, Grataloup C, Plainfossé M (1996) Reproducibility of coronary calcification detection with electron-beam computed tomography. Eur Radiol 6:2106

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shields J, Mielke C, Rockwood T, Short R, Viren F (1995) Reliability of electron beam computed tomography to detect coronary artery calcification. Am J Card Imaging 9:62–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang S, Detrano R, Secci A, Tang W, Doherty T, Puentes G, Wong N, Brundage B (1996) Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. Am Heart J 132:550–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoon H, Greaser L, Mather R, Sinha S, McNitt-Gray M, Goldin J (1997) Coronary artery calcium: alternate methods for accurate and reproducible quantitation. Acad Radiol 4:666–673

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shemesh J, Tenenbaum A, Kopecky K, Apter S, Rozenman J, Itzchak Y, Motro M (1997) Coronary calcium measurements by double helical computed tomography. Using the average instead of peak density algorithm improves reproducibility. Invest Radiol 32:50–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Broderick L, Shemesh J, Wilensky R, Eckert G, Zhou X, Torres W, Balk M, Rogers W, Conces J DJ, Kopecky K (1996) Measurement of coronary artery calcium with dual-slice helical CT compared with coronary angiography: evaluation of CT scoring methods, interobserver variations, and reproducibility. Am J Roentgenol 167:439–444

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McCollough C, Kaufmann R, Cameron B, Katz D, Sheedy P II, Peyser P (1995) Electron-beam CT: use of a calibration phantom to reduce variability in calcium quantification. Radiology 196:159–165

    Google Scholar 

  22. Becker C, Knez A, Jakobs T, Aydemir S, Becker A, Schöpf U, Bruening R, Haberl R, Reiser M (1999) Detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification with electron-beam and conventional CT. Eur Radiol 9:62–04

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shemesh J (1994) Spiral methods quantify coronary calcification. Computed Tomography :30–32

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shemesh J, Apter S, Rozenman J, Lusky A, Rath S, Itzchak Y, Motro M (1995) Calcification of coronary arteries: detection and quantification with double-helix CT. Radiology 197:779–783

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shemesh J, Fisman E, Tenenbaum A, Apter S, Leibovitch L, Rath S, Itzchak Y, Motro M (1997) Coronary artery calcification in women with syndrome X: usefulness of double-helical CT for detection. Radiology 205:697–700

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shemesh J, Tenenbaum A, Fisman E, Apter S, Rath S, Rozenman J, Itzchak Y, Motro M (1996) Absence of coronary calcification on double-helical CT scans: predictor of angiographically normal coronary arteries in elderly women? Radiology 199:66–58

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kalender W (2001) Computed tomography. Wiley, New York

  28. Kachelriess M, Kalender W (1997) ECG-based phase-oriented reconstruction from subsecond spiral CT scans of the heart. Radiology 205:215

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kachelriess M, Kalender W (1998) ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond spiral CT scans of the heart. Med Phys 25:2417–2431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kachelriess M, Kalender W (1998) Imaging of the heart by ECG-oriented reconstruction from subsecond spiral multi-row detector CT scans. Radiology 209:323

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kachelriess M, Kalender W, Karakaya M, Achenbach S, Nossen J, Moshage W, Bautz W (1998) Imaging of the heart by ECG-oriented reconstruction from subsecond spiral CT scans. In: Glazer G, Krestin G (eds) Advances in CT, vol IV. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 137–143

  32. Kachelriess M, Kalender W (1999) ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multirow spiral CT scans of the heart: theoretical considerations, phantom measurements and patient studies. Radiology 213:401

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kachelriess M, Kalender W (1999) ECG-based phase oriented image reconstruction from subsecond spiral multi-row CT scans of the heart. Eur Radiol 9:277

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kachelriess M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender W (1999) EKG-basierte phasenorientierte Bildrekonstruktion aus Subsekunden-Mehrzeilen-Spiral-CT-Aufnahmen des Herzens. Rofo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr (Suppl) 170:174–175

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kachelriess M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender W (2001) Neue Entwicklungen in der Computertomographie: EKG korrelierte Subsekunden-Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT. Röntgenpraxis

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kachelriess M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender W (2000) ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart. Med Phys 27:1881–1902

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kachelriess M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender W (2000) ECG-correlated imaging of the heart with subsecond multislice spiral CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19:888–901

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ulzheimer S, Kachelriess M, Kalender W (1999) Improvements of cardiac CT using ECG-oriented image reconstruction in subsecond spiral multirow scanning. Eur Radiol 9 (Suppl 1):419

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ulzheimer S, Decker R, Kachelriess M, Kalender W (2000) Quality assurance in cardiac CT: phantoms for scanner calibration and comparison of different imaging parameters. Eur Radiol 10 (Suppl 1):303–304

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ulzheimer S (2001) Cardiac imaging with X-ray computed tomography: new approaches to image acquisition and quality assurance. Reports from the Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg. Shaker, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kalender W, Felsenberg D, Genant H, Fischer M, Dequeker J, Reeve J (1995) The European Spine Phantom: a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. Eur J Radiol 20:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kalender W, Süss C, Faust U (1988) Polyethylene-based water- and bone-equivalent materials for calibration phantoms in quantitative computed tomography. Biomed Tech Berl 33:73–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Gorge G, Seibel R, Gronemeyer D, Ge J, Haude M, Rumberger J, Erbel R (1997) Coronary artery calcium in acute coronary syndromes: a comparative study of electron-beam computed tomography, coronary angiography, and intracoronary ultrasound in survivors of acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina. Circulation 96:1461–1469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, Knez A, Kopp A, Fukuda K, Reiser M (2000) Cardiac imaging with rapid, retrospective ECG synchronized multilevel spiral CT. Radiologe 40:111–117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, Kopp A, Schöpf U, Baum U, Knez A, Klingenbeck-Regn K, Reiser M (2000) Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 217:564–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ohnesorge B, Becker C, Flohr T, Reiser M (2002) Multi-slice CT in cardiac imaging. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  47. Hoffmann J (2000) Taschenbuch der Messtechnik, 2nd edn. Fachbuchverlag, Leipzig

  48. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, Kachelriess M, Ropers D, Giesler T, Bautz W, Daniel W, Kalender W, Moshage W (2000) Non-invasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 102:2823–2828

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements.

We thank our colleagues from the Department of Cardiology, especially S. Achenbach and D. Ropers, and from the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, for a good and pleasant collaboration. S. Achenbach supplied us with the cardiac 4D motion functions determined from angiography data. Parts of this work were supported by grants from the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung (AZ 262/98 and AZ 322/99). We also thank the reviewers for their constructive comments which helped to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstrasse 12, 91054 , Erlangen, Germany

    Stefan Ulzheimer & Willi A. Kalender

Authors
  1. Stefan Ulzheimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Willi A. Kalender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Ulzheimer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulzheimer, S., Kalender, W.A. Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13, 484–497 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1746-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1746-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation