Abstract
Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of shoot apices of sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) was evaluated following wounding by cell-wall-digesting enzymes and sonication. The frequency of explants with regenerated shoots expressing GUS (β-glucuronidase) or GFP (green fluorescent protein) increased following treatment with the macerating enzymes cellulase Onozuka R-10 and pectinase Boerozym M5, whereas treatment with macerozyme R-10 had a negative effect. When a combination of cellulase (0.1%) and pectinase (0.05%) was used, the rate of explants with uniformly GUS-positive shoots increased at least twofold. The transient expression of reporter genes was also enhanced using sonication (50 MHz; 2, 4 and 6 s), but stable expression in regenerated shoots following 4 weeks of selection did not increase with this treatment. Enzyme treatment alone (0.1% cellulase and 0.05% pectinase) was superior to a combined treatment of sonication and enzymes with respect to stable transformation. Polymerase chain reaction analyses of shoots recovered by grafting from transformation experiments using GFP as the reporter gene demonstrated the stable integration of the transgene. Regenerated plants were fertile and seeds could be harvested.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BAP :
-
6-Benzylaminopurine
- GA 3 :
-
Gibberellic acid
- GFP :
-
Green fluorescent protein
- GUS :
-
β-Glucuronidase
- IAA :
-
Indoleacetic acid
- nptII :
-
Neomycin phosphotransferase II
References
Alibert B, Lucas O, Le Gall V, Kallerhoff J, Alibert G (1999) Pectolytic enzyme treatment of sunflower explants prior to wounding and cocultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens, enhances efficiency of transient β-glucuronidase expression. Physiol Plant 106:232–237
Alibert G, Aslane-Chanabé C, Burrus M (1994) Sunflower tissue and cell cultures and their use in biotechnology. Plant Physiol Biochem 32:31–44
Bidney D, Scelonge C, Martich J, Burrus M, Sims L, Huffman G (1992) Microprojectile bombardment of plant tissues increases transformation frequency by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol Biol 18:301–313
Burrus M, Chanabé C, Alibert G, Bidney D (1991) Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Cell Rep 10:161–166
Burrus M, Molinier J, Himber C, Hunold R, Bronner R, Rousselin P, Hahne G (1996) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) shoot apices: transformation patterns. Mol Breed 2:329–338
Dehmer KJ, Friedt W (1997) Development of molecular markers for high oleic acid content in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Indian Crop Prod 7:311–315
Doyle JF, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15
Grayburn WS, Vick BA (1995) Transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) following wounding with glass beads. Plant Cell Rep 14:285–289
Hahne G (2001) Sunflower. In: Hui YH, Khatchtourians GG, McHughen A, Nip WK, Scorza R (eds) Handbook of transgenic plants. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 813–833
Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907
Kemner JM, Liang X, Nester EW (1997) The Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence gene chvE is part of a putative ABC-type sugar transport operon. J Bacteriol 179:2452–2458
Knittel N, Gruber V, Hahne G, Lenee P (1994) Transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): a reliable protocol. Plant Cell Rep 14:81–86
Köhler R, Zipfel WR, Webb WW, Hanson MR (1997) The green fluorescent protein as a marker to visualize plant mitochondria in vivo. Plant J 11:613–621
Korell M, Brahm L, Horn R, Friedt W (1996) Interspecific and intergeneric hybridisation in sunflower breeding. I. General breeding aspects. Plant Breed Abstr 66:925–931
Molinier J, Hahne G (1997) Improvement of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). In: Pech JC, Latché A, Bouzayen M (eds) Plant sciences. INRA, Versailles, pp 219–222
Santarém ER, Trick HN, Essig JS, Finer JJ (1998) Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean immature cotyledons: optimization of transient expression. Plant Cell Rep 17:752–759
Sheng J, Citovsky V (1996) Agrobacterium-plant cell DNA transport: have virulence proteins, will travel. Plant Cell 8:1699–1710
Trick HN, Finer JJ (1997) Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Transgenic Res 6:329–337
Vancanneyt G, Schmidt R, O'Connor-Sanchez A, Willmitzer L, Rocha-Sosa M (1989) Construction of an intron containing marker gene: splicing of the intron in transgenic plants and its use in monitoring early events in Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Mol Gen Genet 220:245–250
Vervliet G, Holsters M, Teuchy H, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1975) Characterization of different plaque-forming and defective temperate phages in Agrobacterium strains. J Gen Virol 26:33–48
Weber S, Horn R, Friedt W (2000) High regeneration potential in vitro of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) lines derived from interspecific hybridization. Euphytica 116:271–280
Weber S, Zarhloul MK, Friedt W (2001) Modification of oilseed quality by genetic transformation. In: Esser K, Kadereit JW, Lüttge U, Runge M (eds) Progress in botany, vol 62. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 140–174
Acknowledgements
The financial support of the European Community (contract no. AIR-3-CT94-2003) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn (Project FR-682/8-1), is gratefully acknowledged. We wish to thank Sandra Köhl, Silke Schreiner and Daniela Bernhardt for excellent technical assistance. We like to thank Norbert Martini for providing the construct pBds10FatB3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by K. Glimelius
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, S., Friedt, W., Landes, N. et al. Improved Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.): assessment of macerating enzymes and sonication. Plant Cell Rep 21, 475–482 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0548-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0548-7