Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical findings of vertebral osteomyelitis: Brucella spp. versus other etiologic agents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate patients with vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) in our region and to compare the clinical and laboratory parameters of brucellar and non-brucellar VO patients (NBVO). This retrospective study included 80 patients with VO followed in our hospital between August 2004 and September 2010. The distribution of gender was 43 females (53.8%) and 37 males (46.2%) with average age of 52.5. Patients with brucellar vertebral VO (BVO; n = 30) accounted for 37.5% of all patients, and the rest (n = 50) were with NBVO. Co-morbidities existed in 32.5% of patients. In statistical comparison of VO patients who had the Brucella spp. as the infectious agent with patients of VO by non-brucellar pathogens, the following factors were found out to be significantly associated with BVO; low Charlson score (P = 0.0001), lower co-incidence with chronic renal failure (P = 0.001), high frequency of constitutional symptoms (P = 0.006), fever (P = 0.005), low-level inflammatory markers (WBC; Neutrophil; ESR; CRP, P values 0.006; 0.001; 0.022; 0.002, respectively), low-rate surgical treatment (P = 0.02) and culture positivity (P = 0.0001) and higher hemoglobin, total protein, albumin values (P = 0.002; 0.032; 0.016, respectively). VO may be strongly associated with brucellosis in patients presenting with fever and symptoms, low Charlson score and indistinct inflammatory markers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cottle L, Riordan T (2008) Infectious spondylodiscitis. J Infect 56(6):401–12 (epub 2008 Apr 28)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jevtic V (2004) Vertebral infection. Eur Radiol 14:E43–E52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Skaf GS, Kanafani ZA, Araj GF, Kanj SS (2010) Non-pyogenic infections of the spine. Int J Antimicrob Agents 36(2):99–105 (epub 2010 May 21)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yoon SH, Chung SK, Kim KJ, Kim HJ, Jin YJ, Kim HB (2010) Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: identification of microorganism and laboratory markers used to predict clinical outcome. Eur Spine J 19(4):575–582 (epub 2009 Nov 24)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butler JS, Shelly MJ, Timlin M, Powderly WG, O’Byrne JM (2006) Nontuberculous pyogenic spinal infection in adults: a 12-year experience from a tertiary referral center. Spine 31:2695–2700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Turunc T, Demiroglu YZ, Uncu H, Colakoglu S, Arslan H (2007) A comparative analysis of tuberculous, brucellar and pyogenic spontaneous spondylodiscitis patients. J Infect 55(2):158–163 (epub 2007 Jun 7)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Premru MM, Spik VC, Furlan SL, Zupanc TL (2010) Clinical appearance of Staphylococcus aureus spondylodiscitis and molecular characterization of the isolates. Scand J Infect Dis 42(10):763–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Skaf GS, Domloj NT, Fehlings MG (2010) Pypgenic spondylodiscitis: an overview. J Infect Public Health 3:5–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Belzunegui J, Intxausti JJ, De Dios JR et al (2000) Haematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis in the elderly. Clin Rheumatol 19:344–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Colmenero JD, Jimenez-Mejias ME, Sanchez-Lora FJ et al. (1997) Pyogenic, tuberculous, and brucellar vertebral osteomyelitis: a descriptive and comparative study of 219 cases. Ann Rheum Dis 56:709e15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Govender S (2005) Spinal infections. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(11):1454e8

    Google Scholar 

  12. An HS, Seldomridge JA (2006) Spinal infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:27e33

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bhavan KP, Marschall J, Olsen MA, Fraser VJ, Wright NM, Warren DK (2010) The epidemiology of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis: a cohort study in a tertiary care hospital. BMC Infect Dis 10:158

    Google Scholar 

  14. Priest DH, Peacock JE Jr (2005) Hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis due to Staphylococcus aureus in the adult: clinical features and therapeutic outcomes. South Med J 98(9):854–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Belzunegui J, Del Val N, Intxausti JJ et al (1999) Vertebral osteomyelitis in northern Spain: report of 62 cases. Clin Exp Rheumatol 17:447–452

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chelsom J, Solberg CO (1998) Vertebral osteomyelitis at a Norwegian university hospital 1987–97: clinical features, laboratory findings and outcome. Scand J Infect Dis 30:147–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sexton DJ (2001) Vascular access infections in patients undergoing dialysis with special emphasis on the role and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Dis Clin North Am 15:731–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nassar GM, Ayus JC (2001) Infectious complications of the hemodialysis access. Kidney Int 60(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steinberg JP, Clark CC, Hackman BO (1996) Nosocomial and community acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteremias from 1980 to 1993: impact of intravascular devices and methicillin resistance. Clin Infect Dis 23:255–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jensen AG, Espersen F, Skinhoj P et al (1998) Bacteremic Staphylococcus aureus spondylitis. Arch Intern Med 158:509–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elif Şahin Horasan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horasan, E.Ş., Çolak, M., Ersöz, G. et al. Clinical findings of vertebral osteomyelitis: Brucella spp. versus other etiologic agents. Rheumatol Int 32, 3449–3453 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2213-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2213-3

Keywords

Navigation