Skip to main content
Log in

Maligne Lymphome des Auges

Malignant lymphomas of the eye

  • Schwerpunkt: Tumoren der Sinnesorgane
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Das Auge und seine Anhangsgebilde stellen einen seltenen Manifestationsort maligner Non-Hodgkin-Lymphome (NHL) dar. In Abhängigkeit von der anatomischen Lokalisation müssen intraokuläre Lymphome von NHL der Adnexstrukturen wie Bindehaut, Tränendrüsen und Orbita unterschieden werden. Während es sich bei der zweiten Gruppe überwiegend um indolente extranodale Marginalzonenlymphome (MALT-Lymphome [„mucosa associated lymphoid tissue“]) oder um sekundäre Manifestationen systemischer NHL handelt, sind primäre intraokuläre Lymphome meist als diffus großzellige B‑Zell-Lymphome (DLBCL) zu klassifizieren und werden als Sonderform des primären DLBCL des zentralen Nervensystems (ZNS) gewertet. Die häufigste Form ist das primäre vitreoretinale Lymphom, das unspezifische klinische Symptome bietet, oft schwierig von einer Uveitis abzugrenzen ist und daher auch als Masquerade-Syndrom bezeichnet wird. Die Diagnose wird üblicherweise durch die zytologische, immunzytochemische und molekulare Analyse eines Glaskörperaspirats gestellt, wird aber oft durch zytolytische Veränderungen, geringe Materialmengen und pseudoklonale Ergebnisse in der Klonalitätsanalyse erschwert. Neuere Ansätze wie der Nachweis von MYD88-Mutationen erlauben eine deutliche Verbesserung der Sensitivität. Enge Kooperation mit den klinischen Kollegen und rasche Aufarbeitung des Materials sind Grundvoraussetzungen für eine optimale Diagnostik.

Abstract

The eye and the ocular adnexae are rare sites for malignant non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Based on their anatomical location, intraocular lymphomas must be discerned from NHL of adnexal structures including conjunctiva, lacrimal gland, and orbit. Whereas the latter group mostly consists of indolent extranodal marginal zone B‑cell lymphomas of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type or secondary manifestations of systemic NHL, most primary intraocular lymphomas are classified as diffuse large B‑cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and are considered a variant of primary DLBCL of the central nervous system. The most common form is primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL), which presents with nonspecific symptoms and is difficult to discern from uveitis. Diagnosis of PVRL is usually made by cytological, immunocytochemical, and molecular analysis of vitreous aspirates. Degenerative changes, limited material, and the occurrence of pseudoclonality in the molecular analysis of B‑cell clonality can hamper diagnostic assessment. Novel techniques such as detection of MYD88 mutations common in PVRL can increase diagnostic sensitivity. Close cooperation with clinical colleagues and rapid specimen processing are fundamental for successful diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Bonzheim I, Giese S, Deuter C et al (2015) High frequency of myd88 mutations in vitreoretinal B‑cell lymphoma: a valuable tool to improve diagnostic yield of vitreous aspirates. Blood 126:76–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Camilleri-Broet S, Criniere E, Broet P et al (2006) A uniform activated b‑cell-like immunophenotype might explain the poor prognosis of primary central nervous system lymphomas: analysis of 83 cases. Blood 107:190–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coupland SE (2013) Molecular pathology of lymphoma. Eye (Lond) 27:180–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coupland SE, Anastassiou G, Bornfeld N et al (2005) Primary intraocular lymphoma of t‑cell type: report of a case and review of the literature. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:189–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coupland SE, Chan CC, Smith J (2009) Pathophysiology of retinal lymphoma. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 17:227–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Coupland SE, Damato B (2008) Understanding intraocular lymphomas. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 36:564–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coupland SE, Hummel M, Muller HH et al (2005) Molecular analysis of immunoglobulin genes in primary intraocular lymphoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:3507–3514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fend F, Ferreri AJ, Coupland SE (2016) How we diagnose and treat vitreoretinal lymphoma. Br J Haematol 173:680–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fisson S, Ouakrim H, Touitou V et al (2013) Cytokine profile in human eyes: contribution of a new cytokine combination for differential diagnosis between intraocular lymphoma or uveitis. PLOS ONE 8:e52385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez-Aguilar A, Idbaih A, Boisselier B et al (2012) Recurrent mutations of myd88 and tbl1xr1 in primary central nervous system lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res 18:5203–5211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grimm SA, Pulido JS, Jahnke K et al (2007) Primary intraocular lymphoma: an international primary central nervous system lymphoma collaborative group report. Ann Oncol 18:1851–1855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoang-Xuan K, Bessell E, Bromberg J et al (2015) Diagnosis and treatment of primary cns lymphoma in immunocompetent patients: guidelines from the european association for neuro-oncology. Lancet Oncol 16:e322–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kakkassery V, Stubiger N, Adamietz IA et al (2015) lymphoma of the ocular adnexa. Ophthalmologe 112:210–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kraan W, Horlings HM, van Keimpema M et al (2013) High prevalence of oncogenic myd88 and cd79b mutations in diffuse large b‑cell lymphomas presenting at immune-privileged sites. Blood Cancer J 3:e139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Levasseur SD, Wittenberg LA, White VA (2013) Vitreoretinal lymphoma: A 20-year review of incidence, clinical and cytologic features, treatment, and outcomes. JAMA Ophthalmol 131:50–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malumbres R, Davis J, Ruiz P et al (2007) Somatically mutated immunoglobulin ighv@ genes without intraclonal heterogeneity indicate a postgerminal centre origin of primary intraocular diffuse large b‑cell lymphomas. Br J Haematol 138:749–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Merle-Beral H, Davi F, Cassoux N et al (2004) Biological diagnosis of primary intraocular lymphoma. Br J Haematol 124:469–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Missotten T, Tielemans D, Bromberg JE et al (2013) Multicolor flowcytometric immunophenotyping is a valuable tool for detection of intraocular lymphoma. Ophthalmology 120:991–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Montesinos-Rongen M, Brunn A, Bentink S et al (2008) Gene expression profiling suggests primary central nervous system lymphomas to be derived from a late germinal center b cell. Leukemia 22:400–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mulay K, Honavar SG (2016) An update on ocular adnexal lymphoma. Semin Diagn Pathol 33:164–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Riemersma SA, Jordanova ES, Schop RF et al (2000) Extensive genetic alterations of the hla region, including homozygous deletions of hla class ii genes in b‑cell lymphomas arising in immune-privileged sites. Blood 96:3569–3577

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sassone M, Ponzoni M, Ferreri AJ (2017) Ocular adnexal marginal zone lymphoma: clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 30:118–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Y, Shen D, Wang VM et al (2011) Molecular biomarkers for the diagnosis of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma. Int J Mol Sci 12:5684–5697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Fend.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

F. Fend, D. Süsskind, C. Deuter und S.E. Coupland geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

H.A. Baba, Essen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fend, F., Süsskind, D., Deuter, C. et al. Maligne Lymphome des Auges. Pathologe 38, 515–520 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-017-0378-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-017-0378-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation