Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the chemical structure of poly(urea-urethane-siloxane)s on their morphological, surface and thermal properties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polymer Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Segmented poly(urethane-urea-siloxane)s (PUUS) were synthesized using 4,4′-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and ethylene diamine (ED) as the hard segment components and hydroxypropyl-terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) as the soft segment component, where the hard segment content ranged from 38 to 65 wt%. Segmented PUUSs were prepared by a two-step polymerization procedure in tetrahydrofuran/N-methylpyrrolidone (THF/NMP) mixture with a large proportion of polar solvent. The structure, composition and hard segment length were determined by 13C NMR and two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy. Thermal, mechanical, small-angle X-ray scattering and hydrogen bonding analyses indicated the formation of the microphase-separated copolymers with high tensile strength. Globular superstructures observed in the copolymer films by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were probably arisen from the microstructural organization of the MDI-ED segments, depending on their content and length. The PUUS copolymers showed high water resistance and became more hydrophobic with increasing weight fraction of PDMS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dvornic PR, Lenz RW (1990) High temperature siloxane elastomers. Hüthing and Wepf, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yilgör I, McGrath JE (1988) Polysiloxane containing copolymers: a survey of recent developments. Adv Polym Sci 86:1–86. doi:10.1007/BFb0025274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stokes K, McVenes R, Anderson JM (1995) Polyurethane elastomer biostability. J Biomater Appl 9:321–354. doi:10.1177/088532829500900402

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Petrovic ZS, Ferguson J (1991) Polyurethane elastomers. Prog Polym Sci 16:695–836. doi:10.1016/0079-6700(91)90011-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seymour W, Cooper SL (1973) Thermal analysis of polyurethane block polymers. Macromolecules 6:48–53. doi:10.1021/ma60031a008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarva SS, Hsieh AJ (2009) The effect of microstructure on the rate-dependent stress-strain behavior of poly(urethane urea) elastomers. Polymer 50:3007–3015. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2009.04.025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li H, Freeman BD, Ekiner OM (2011) Gas permeation properties of poly(urethane-urea)s containing different polyethers. J Membrane Sci 369:49–58. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ning L, Ning WD, Kang YS (1996) Crystallinity and hydrogen bonding of hard segments in segmented poly(urethane urea) copolymers. Polymer 37:3577–3583. doi:10.1016/0032-3861(96)00166-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spaans CJ, de Groot JH, Dekens FG, Pennings AJ (1998) High molecular weight polyurethanes and a polyurethane urea based on 1,4-butanediisocyanate. Polym Bull 41:131–138. doi:10.1007/s002890050343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheth JP, Aneja A, Wilkes GL, Yilgor E, Atilla GE, Yilgor I, Beyer FL (2004) Influence of system variables on the morphological and dynamic mechanical behavior of polydimethylsiloxane based segmented polyurethane and polyurea copolymers: a comparative perspective. Polymer 45:6919–6932. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.06.057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yilgor I, Eynur T, Yilgor E, Wilkes GL (2009) Contribution of soft segment entanglement on the tensile properties of silicone-urea copolymers with low hard segment contents. Polymer 50:4432–4437. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yilgor E, Burgaz E, Yurtsever E, Yilgor I (2000) Comparison of hydrogen bonding in polydimethylsiloxane and polyether based urethane and urea copolymers. Polymer 41:849–857. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00245-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Xue-Hai Yu, Nagarajan MR, Grasel TG, Gibson PE, Cooper SL (1985) Polydimethylsiloxane–polyurethane elastomers: synthesis and properties of segmented copolymers and related zwitter ionomers. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 23:2319–2338. doi:10.1002/pol.1985.180231106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang LF, Ji Q, Glass TE, Ward TC, McGrath JE, Muggli M, Burns G, Sorathia U (2000) Synthesis and characterization of organosiloxane modified segmented polyether polyurethanes. Polymer 41:5083–5093. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00570-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hergenrother RW, Yu XH, Cooper SL (1994) Blood-contacting properties of polydimethylsiloxane polyurea–urethanes. Biomaterials 15:635–640. doi:10.1016/0142-9612(94)90215-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Balaban M, Antić V, Pergal M, Francolini I, Martinelli A, Djonlagić J (2012) The effect of the polar solvents on the synthesis of poly(urethane-urea-siloxane)s. J Serb Chem Soc 77:1457–1481. doi:10.2298/JSC111025056B

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaji A, Murano M (1990) Sequence distribution of segmented polyurethane–urea. Polym J 22:1065–1075. doi:10.1295/polymj.22.1065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo N, Wang DN, Ying SH (1996) Study on sequence distribution of segmented poly(urethane urea)s by 13C-NMR spectroscopy: effect of polymerization procedures. J Polym Sci A 34:2157–2161. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(199608)34:11<2157:AID-POLA8>3.0.CO;2-W

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ilarduya AM, Carvalho E, Alla A, Muñoz-Guerra S (2010) Sequence analysis of polyether-based thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers by 13C NMR. Macromolecules 43:3990–3993. doi:10.1021/ma100395x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zong J, Zhang Q, Sun H, Yu Y, Wang S, Liu Y (2010) Characterization of polydimethylsiloxane–polyurethanes synthesized by graft or block copolymerizations. Polym Bull 65:477–493. doi:10.1007/s00289-010-0262-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Garrett JT, Lin JS, Runt J (2002) Influence of preparation conditions on microdomain formation in poly(urethane urea) block copolymers. Macromolecules 35:161–168. doi:10.1021/ma010915d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Teo L-S, Chen C-Y, Kuo J-F (1997) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study on effects of temperature on hydrogen bonding in amine-containing polyurethanes and poly(urethane-urea)s. Macromolecules 30:1793–1799. doi:10.1021/ma961035f

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yilgor E, Yurtsever E, Yilgor I (2002) Hydrogen bonding and polyurethane morphology. II. Spectroscopic, thermal and crystallization behavior of polyether blends with 1,3-dimethylurea and a model urethane compound. Polymer 43:6561–6568. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00566-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Garrett JT, Xu R, Cho J, Runt J (2003) Phase separation of diamine chain-extended poly(urethane) copolymers: FTIR spectroscopy and phase transitions. Polymer 44:2711–2719. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00165-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang S, Ren Z, He S, Zhu Y, Zhu C (2007) FTIR spectroscopic characterization of polyurethane-urea model hard segments (PUUMHS) based on three diamine chain extenders. Spectrochim Acta A 66:188–193. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2006.02.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yilgor I, Yilgor E, Ward TC, Guler IG, Wilkes GL (2006) FTIR investigation of the influence of diisocyanate symmetry on the morphology development in model segmented polyurethanes. Polymer 47:4105–4114. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yilgor I, Yilgor E, Das S, Wilkes GL (2009) Time-dependent morphology development in segmented polyetherurea copolymers based on aromatic diisocyanates. J Polym Sci B 47:471–483. doi:10.1002/polb.21652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Adhikari R, Gunatillake PA, Bown M (2003) Effect of polydimethylsiloxane macrodiol molecular weight on properties and morphology of polyurethane and polyurethaneurea. J Appl Polym Sci 90:1565–1573. doi:10.1002/app.12748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Song YM, Chen WC, Liu KH, Tseng YH (1996) Effect of isocyanates on the crystallinity and thermal stability of polyurethanes. J Appl Polym Sci 62:827–834. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19961031)62:5<827:AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-P

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sheth JP, Yilgor E, Erenturk B, Ozhalici H, Yilgor I, Wilkes GL (2005) Structure-property behavior of poly(dimethylsiloxane) based segmented polyurea copolymers modified with poly(propylene oxide). Polymer 46:8185–8193. doi:10.1016/j.polylmer.2005.06.050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheth JP, Klinedinst DB, Wilkes GL, Yilgor I, Yilgor E (2005) Role of chain symmetry and hydrogen bonding in segmented copolymers with monodisperse hard segments. Polymer 46:7317–7322. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yilgor E, Atilla GE, Ekin A, Kurt P, Yilgor I (2003) Isopropyl alcohol: an unusual, powerful, ‘green’ solvent for the preparation of silicone-urea copolymers with high urea contents. Polymer 44:7787–7793. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Abouzahr S, Wilkes GL, Ophir Z (1982) Structure-property behaviour of segmented polyether-MDI-butanediol based urethanes: effect of composition ratio. Polymer 23:1077–1086. doi:10.1016/0032-3861(82)90411-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu C, Hu CP (2009) Synthesis, characterization and in vitro oxidative stability of poly(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)methylsiloxane modified polyurethaneurea. Polym Degrad Stab 94:259–266. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.10.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Childs MA, Matlock DD, Dorgan JR, Ohno TR (2001) Surface morphology of poly(caprolactone)-b-poly(dimethylsiloxane)-b-poly(caprolactone) copolymers: effects on protein adsorption. Biomacromolecules 2:526–537. doi:10.1021/bm0100054PMid:11749216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Madhavan K, Reddy BSR (2006) Poly(dimethylsiloxane-urethane) membranes: effect of hard segment in urethane on gas transport properties. J Membrane Sci 283:357–365. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pergal MV, Antic VV, Govedarica MN, Godjevac D, Ostojic S, Djonlagic J (2011) Synthesis and characterization of novel urethane-siloxane copolymers with a high content of PCL-PDMS-PCL segments. J Appl Polym Sci 122:2715–2730. doi:10.1002/app.33926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee YH, Kim EJ, Kim HD (2011) Synthesis and properties of waterborne poly(urethane urea)s containing polydimethylsiloxane. J Appl Polym Sci 120:212–219. doi:10.1002/app.33007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia (Project No. 172062).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milica Balaban.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balaban, M., Antić, V., Pergal, M. et al. Influence of the chemical structure of poly(urea-urethane-siloxane)s on their morphological, surface and thermal properties. Polym. Bull. 70, 2493–2518 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-013-0968-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-013-0968-2

Keywords

Navigation