Skip to main content
Log in

Genotyping of Burkholderia pseudomallei Isolated From Patients in South-Western Coastal Region of India

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Burkholderia pseudomallei is the causative agent of melioidosis. Various tools have been used to determine the genetic diversity in B. pseudomallei isolates. In this study, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)—PCR and flagellin gene (fliC) based PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) were used to genotype Indian clinical B. pseudomallei isolates. A total of 89 clinical isolates could be grouped in 6 groups (A through F) by RAPD-PCR analysis. Some of the isolates in various groups had identical banding pattern suggesting them to be epidemiologically related. The RAPD groups also correlated with MLST sequence types suggesting the utility of this easy to do typing method. The PCR- RFLP analysis suggested Type III to be the predominant type which is different from other RFLP types reported from Southeast Asia. In conclusion, the results of this study show that RAPD-PCR, a simple genotyping method, may be used for analyzing the B. pseudomallei isolates and also establish epidemiological relevant relatedness among them. The results of fliC PCR–RFLP further suggest the Indian isolates are different from other Southeast Asian isolates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Data Availability

All relevant data are available in the Manuscript.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Churuangsuk C, Chusri S, Hortiwakul T, Charernmak B, Silpapojakul K (2016) Characteristics, clinical outcomes and factors influencing mortality of patients with melioidosis in southern Thailand: a 10-year retrospective study. Asian Pac J Trop Med 9:256–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Limmathurotsakul D, Golding N, Dance DA, Messina JP, Pigott DM et al (2016) Predicted global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and burden of melioidosis. Nat Microbiol 1:15008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Koshy M, Jagannati M, Ralph R, Victor P, David T et al (2019) Clinical manifestations, antimicrobial drug susceptibility patterns, and outcomes in melioidosis cases, India. Emerg Infect Dis 25:316–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mukhopadhyay C, Shaw T, Varghese GM, Dance DAB (2018) Melioidosis in South Asia (India, Nepal, Pakistan, Bhutan and Afghanistan). Trop Med Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed3020051

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Vidyalakshmi K, Lipika S, Vishal S, Damodar S, Chakrapani M (2012) Emerging clinico-epidemiological trends in melioidosis: analysis of 95 cases from western coastal India. Int J Infect Dis 16:e491-497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chewapreecha C, Holden MT, Vehkala M, Valimaki N, Yang Z et al (2017) Global and regional dissemination and evolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Nat Microbiol 2:16263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tay ST, Cheah PC, Puthucheary SD (2010) Sequence polymorphism and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the flagellin gene of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Clin Microbiol 48:1465–1467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leelayuwat C, Romphruk A, Lulitanond A, Trakulsomboon S, Thamlikitkul V (2000) Genotype analysis of Burkholderia pseudomallei using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD): indicative of genetic differences amongst environmental and clinical isolates. Acta Trop 77:229–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Antonov VA, Tkachenko GA, Altukhova VV, Savchenko SS, Zinchenko OV et al (2008) Molecular identification and typing of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei: when is enough enough? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 102(Suppl 1):S134-139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haase A, Melder A, Smith-Vaughan H, Kemp D, Currie B (1995) RAPD analysis of isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from patients with recurrent melioidosis. Epidemiol Infect 115:115–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bandeira T, Castelo-Branco D, Rocha MFG, Cordeiro RA, Ocadaque CJ et al (2017) Clinical and environmental isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from Brazil: genotyping and detection of virulence gene. Asian Pac J Trop Med 10:945–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tellapragada C, Kamthan A, Shaw T, Ke V, Kumar S et al (2016) Unravelling the molecular epidemiology and genetic diversity among Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from South India using multi-locus sequence typing. PLoS ONE 11:e0168331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamthan A, Shaw T, Mukhopadhyay C, Kumar S (2018) Molecular analysis of clinical Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from southwestern coastal region of India, using multi-locus sequence typing. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 12:e0006915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zueter AR, Rahman ZA, Abumarzouq M, Harun A (2018) Multilocus sequence types of clinical Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from peninsular Malaysia and their associations with disease outcomes. BMC Infect Dis 18:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sathkumara HD, Merritt AJ, Corea EM, Krishnananthasivam S, Natesan M et al (2018) Clinical, bacteriologic, and geographic stratification of melioidosis emerges from the Sri Lankan National Surveillance Program. Am J Trop Med Hyg 98:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Price EP, Sarovich DS, Viberg L, Mayo M, Kaestli M et al (2015) Whole-genome sequencing of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates from an unusual melioidosis case identifies a polyclonal infection with the same multilocus sequence type. J Clin Microbiol 53:282–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aziz A, Currie BJ, Mayo M, Sarovich DS, Price EP (2020) Comparative genomics confirms a rare melioidosis human-to-human transmission event and reveals incorrect phylogenomic reconstruction due to polyclonality. Microb Genom. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Godoy D, Randle G, Simpson AJ, Aanensen DM, Pitt TL et al (2003) Multilocus sequence typing and evolutionary relationships among the causative agents of melioidosis and glanders, Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei. J Clin Microbiol 41:2068–2079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tissera K, Liyanapathirana V, Dissanayake N, Pinto V, Ekanayake A et al (2017) Spread of resistant gram negatives in a Sri Lankan intensive care unit. BMC Infect Dis 17:490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Modhapati SR, Rohit A, Aditya V, Shetty VP, Mohanapriya AK et al (2021) Comparative analysis of different methods used for molecular characterization of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolated from noncystic fibrosis conditions. Indian J Med Microbiol 40:74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Penn CW, Luke CJ (1992) Bacterial flagellar diversity and significance in pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 100:331–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Winstanley C, Morgan JAW (1997) The bacterial flagellin gene as a biomarker for detection, population genetics and epidemiological analysis. Microbiology (Reading) 143(Pt 10):3071–3084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. DeShazer D, Brett PJ, Carlyon R, Woods DE (1997) Mutagenesis of Burkholderia pseudomallei with Tn5-OT182: isolation of motility mutants and molecular characterization of the flagellin structural gene. J Bacteriol 179:2116–2125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Winstanley C, Hales BA, Corkill JE, Gallagher MJ, Hart CA (1998) Flagellin gene variation between clinical and environmental isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei contrasts with the invariance among clinical isolates. J Med Microbiol 47:689–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Novak RT, Glass MB, Gee JE, Gal D, Mayo MJ et al (2006) Development and evaluation of a real-time PCR assay targeting the type III secretion system of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Clin Microbiol 44:85–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gee JE, Sacchi CT, Glass MB, De BK, Weyant RS et al (2003) Use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for rapid identification and differentiation of Burkholderia pseudomallei and B. mallei. J Clin Microbiol 41:4647–4654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Khosravi Y, Vellasamy KM, Mariappan V, Ng SL, Vadivelu J (2014) Antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic characterisation of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolated from Malaysian patients. ScientificWorldJournal 2014:132971

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Holden MT, Titball RW, Peacock SJ, Cerdeño-Tárraga AM, Atkins T et al (2004) Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14240–14245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Radua S, Ling OW, Srimontree S, Lulitanond A, Hin WF et al (2000) Characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolated in Thailand and Malaysia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 38:141–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wongratanacheewin S, Komutrin K, Sermswan RW (2000) Use of multiplex PCR patterns as genetic markers for Burkholderia pseudomallei. Acta Trop 74:193–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Norton R, Roberts B, Freeman M, Wilson M, Ashhurst-Smith C et al (1998) Characterisation and molecular typing of Burkholderia pseudomallei: are disease presentations of melioidosis clonally related? FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 20:37–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nasutionab F, Theanhom A, Sukartini, Bhuyard P, Chumpookam J (2021) Genetic diversity evaluation in wild Muntingia calabura L. based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Gene Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101335

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Director, Defence Research & Development Establishment (DRDE), Ministry of Defence, Government of India, Jhansi Road, Gwalior for his constant support and providing necessary facilities for this study. DRDE accession number for this manuscript is DRDE/MB/15/2021.

Funding

The funding for the work was met through core institutional funds. No specific funding was received for this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SK: Research conceptualisation, data analysis, project administration, editing and review of the manuscript; CM: Research conceptualization, resources, review of the manuscript; AK: methodology and research work, draft of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subodh Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The clinical samples were received at Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal for laboratory diagnosis and the study was approved by Institutional Ethical committee (Approval No. IEC 241/2011). The study on B. pseudomallei isolates was approved by Institutional Biosafety Committee of DRDE, Gwalior.

Consent to Participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 70 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamthan, A., Mukhopadhyay, C. & Kumar, S. Genotyping of Burkholderia pseudomallei Isolated From Patients in South-Western Coastal Region of India. Curr Microbiol 79, 226 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-02905-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-02905-6

Navigation