Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The administration of gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after the failure of erlotinib

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Recent studies have demonstrated that erlotinib therapy may be considered an option for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who experienced disease progression after treatment with gefitinib, particularly in patients in whom the disease had been stabilized for a long time prior to gefitinib therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the disease control rate and toxicity of gefitinib in patients whose disease progressed after erlotinib therapy.

Methods

From May 2005 to August 2006, 15 patients received a 250 mg/day dosage of gefitinib after having disease progression while taking erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg/day.

Results

Among patients who received erlotinib, 1 (7%) achieved a partial response (PR), and 5 (33%) achieved stable disease (SD). Among patients who received gefitinib, none achieved a PR, and 6 achieved SD (40%). Five out of 6 patients who achieved PR/SD with erlotinib also achieved SD with gefitinib; 8 out of 9 patients who achieved a progressive disease (PD) with erlotinib also achieved a PD with gefitinib. The median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 3.5 months, respectively. The TTP and OS in SD patients were 3.7 and 7.4 months, respectively. The most common toxicities of gefitinib were dry skin (grade 1–2) in 27% of patients and acneiform rashes and rashes/desquamation in 20% of patients. Diarrhea (grade 1–2) occurred in 7% of patients.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that patients who achieved PR/SD with erlotinib also benefit from taking gefitinib. Conversely, gefitinib is not recommended in patients whose disease progressed after taking erlotinib.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jänne PA, Engelman JA, Johnson BE (2005) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for treatment and tumor biology. J Clin Oncol 23:3227–3234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baselga J, Arteaga CL (2005) Critical update and emerging trends in epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:2445–2459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thatcher N, Chang A, Parikh P et al (2005) Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer). Lancet 366:1527–1537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S et al (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 361:947–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JS, Park K, Kim SW et al (2009) A randomised phase III study of gefitinib (IRESSA) versus standard chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) as a first-line treatment for never-smokers with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung. World Conference on Lung Cancer Proceedings 2009:PRS 4

  6. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y et al (2010) Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:121–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362:2380–2388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J et al (2005) Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 353:123–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bezjak A, Tu D, Seymour L et al (2006) Symptom improvement in lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib: quality of life analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21. J Clin Oncol 24:3831–3837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou C, Wu Y, Chen G et al (2010) Efficacy results from the randomise phase III OPTIMAL (CTONG 0802) study comparing first-line erlotinib versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine, in Chinese advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR activating mutations (abstract # LBA13). Ann Oncol 21 (Suppl 8):viii6

  11. Rosell R, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A et al (2011) Erlotinib versus chemotherapy (CT) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations: interim results of the European Erlotinib Versus Chemotherapy (EURTAC) phase III randomized trial. In: ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. Part I. vol 29, No. 15 (May 20 Suppl):7503

  12. Togashi Y, Masago K, Fujita S et al (2011) Differences in adverse events between 250 mg daily gefitinib and 150 mg daily erlotinib in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 74(1):98–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baselga J, Rischin D, Ranson M et al (2002) Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic trial of ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inpatients with five selected solid tumor types. J Clin Oncol 20:4292–4302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hidalgo M, Siu LL, Nemunaitis J et al (2001) Phase I and pharmacologic study of OSI-774, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 19:3267–3279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho BC, Im CK, Park MS et al (2007) Phase II study of erlotinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of gefitinib. J Clin Oncol 25:2528–2533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vasile E, Tibaldi C, Chella A et al (2008) Erlotinib after failure of gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously responding to gefitinib. J Thorac Oncol 3:912–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee DH, Kim SW, Suh C et al (2008) Phase II study of erlotinib as a salvage treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer patients after failure of gefitinib treatment. Ann Oncol 19:2039–2042

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong AS, Soong R, Seah SB et al (2008) Evidence for disease control with erlotinib after gefitinib failure in typical gefitinib-sensitive Asian patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 3:400–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sim SH, Han SW, Oh DY et al (2009) Erlotinib after gefitinib failure in female never-smoker Asian patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 65:204–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Costa DB, Son K, Cho BC et al (2008) Effects of erlotinib in EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancers with resistance to gefitinib. Clin Cancer Res 14:7060–7067

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou ZT, Xu XH, Wei Q et al (2009) Erlotinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after gefitinib failure. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64:1123–1127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Katayama T, Shimizu J, Suda K et al (2009) Efficacy of erlotinib for brain and leptomeningeal metastases in patients with lung adenocarcinoma who showed initial good response to gefitinib. J Thorac Oncol 4:1415–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wong MK, Lo AI, Lam B et al (2010) Erlotinib as salvage treatment after failure to first-line gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 65:1023–1028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Asami K, Kawahara M, Atagi S et al (2011) Duration of prior gefitinib treatment predicts survival potential in patients with lung adenocarcinoma receiving subsequent erlotinib. Lung Cancer 73:211–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hata A, Katakami N, Yoshioka H et al (2011) Erlotinib after gefitinib failure in relapsed non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical benefit with optimal patient selection. Lung Cancer 74(2):268–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shih YN, Liou JL, Jiang WC et al (2007) Phase II study of erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who failed prior gefitinib treatment. J Thorac Oncol 8:S743 (P3–P150)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Choong NW, Dietrich S, Seiwert TY et al (2006) Gefitinib response of erlotinib-refractory lung cancer involving meninges–role of EGFR mutation. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 3:50–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaira K, Naito T, Takahashi T et al (2010) Pooled analysis of the reports of erlotinib after failure of gefitinib for non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 68:99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo R, Chen X, Wang T et al (2011) Subsequent chemotherapy reverses acquired tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance and restores response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 11:90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Watanabe S, Tanaka J, Ota T et al (2011) Clinical responses to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor retreatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients who benefited from prior effective gefitinib therapy: a retrospective analysis. BMC Cancer 11:1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chou WC, Huang SF, Yeh KY et al (2006) Different responses to gefitinib in lung adenocarcinoma coexpressing mutant- and wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor genes. Jpn J Clin Oncol 36:523–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Riely GJ, Kris MG, Zhao B et al (2007) Prospective assessment of discontinuation and reinitiation of erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib followed by the addition of everolimus. Clin Cancer Res 13:5150–5155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Francesco Grossi received an honorarium to serve on scientific meetings of Roche and Astra-Zeneca. The other co-authors have not conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Grossi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grossi, F., Rijavec, E., Dal Bello, M.G. et al. The administration of gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after the failure of erlotinib. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 69, 1407–1412 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-012-1848-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-012-1848-4

Keywords

Navigation