Abstract
Purpose: Based on previous experience, we combined topotecan with paclitaxel (weekly administration) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our primary objective was to determine the response rate and survival and our secondary objective, the safety of the regimen. Methods: From October 2003, until March 2005, 45 patients all with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. All patients were chemotherapy and radiotherapy naive. Both agents were infused on day 1 of every week once for three consecutive weeks, every 28 days. Three infusions were considered as one course. The treatment plan was to give three courses (nine infusions) and then to evaluate the response. Topotecan (1.75 mg/m2) was infused for 30 min and paclitaxel (70 mg/m2) for 90 min; these doses had been established as the maximum tolerated dose in a previous phase I–II trial. Results: Eighteen/45 (40%) patients responded, 2 (4.4%) complete responses and 16 (35.6%) partial responses. Twenty-one (46.7%) patients had stable disease, and 6 (13.3%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 8 months and median time to tumor progression 9 months. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in two patients (in these two patients, the dose of both drugs was reduced by 25% and G-CSF was given), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one patient and grade 4 anemia in one patient. Conclusion: This novel combination of topotecan–paclitaxel in a weekly administration rendered a 40% response rate, with very low toxicity in stages IIIA, IIIB and IV NSCLC patients.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fosella FV, de Vore R, Kerr RN et al (2000) Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. J Clin Oncol 18:2354–2362
Georgoulias V, Kouroussis CH Androulakis N et al (1999) Front-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with docetaxel and gemcitabine: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 17:914–920
Stathopoulos GP, Veslemes M, Georgatou N et al (2004) Front-line paclitaxel-vinorelbine versus paclitaxel-carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol 15:1048–1055
Crino L, Scagliotti G, Maragolo M et al (1997) Cisplatin–gemcitabine combination in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 15:297–303
Huizing MT, Giaccone G, van Warmerdam LJC et al (1997) Pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and carboplatin in a dose-escalating and dose-sequencing study in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:317–329
Belani CP, Keams CM, Zuhowski EG et al (1999) Phase I trial, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlations, of combinations paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:676–684
Iaffaioli RV, Tortoriello A, Facchini G et al (1999) Phase I–II study of gemcitabine and carboplatin in stage IIIB–IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:921–926
Pectasides D, Aspropotamitis A, Halikia A et al (1999) Combination chemotherapy with carboplatin, docetaxel, gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 17:3816–3821
Comella P, Frasci G, Panza N et al (2000) Randomized trial comparing cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine with either cisplatin and gemcitabine or cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: interim analysis of a phase III trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 18:1451–1457
Depierre A, Chastang CI, Quoix E et al (1994) Vinorelbine plus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. Ann Oncol 5:37–42
Oshita F, Noda K, Nishiwaki Y et al (1997) Phase II study of irinotecan and etoposide in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 15:304–309
Lorusso V, Carpagnano F, Frasci G et al (2000) Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:405–411
Dimitroulis J, Stathopoulos GP (2005) Evolution of non-small-cell lung cancer chemotherapy (Review). Oncol Rep 13:923–930
Sargent DJ, Niedzwiecki D, O’Connell MJ et al (2001) Recommendation for caution with irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:144–145
Rougier P, van Custem E, Bajetta E et al (1998) Randomized trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1407–1412
Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD et al (1998) Randomized trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1413–1418
Ardizzoni A, Hansen H, Dombernowsky P et al (1997) Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. J Clin Oncol 15:2090–2096
Markman M (1997) Topotecan: an important new drug in the management of ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol 4(Suppl 5):55–58
Bokkel Huinick WT, Gore M, Carmichael J et al (1997) Topotecan vs paclitaxel for the treatment or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:2183–2187
Stathopoulos GP, Rigatos SK, Christodoulou Ch et al (2004) Weekly administration of topotecan and paclitaxel in pretreated advanced cancer patients: a phase I/II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 54:259–264
Rowinsky EK (2002) Weekly topotecan: an alternative to topotecan’s standard daily x5 schedule? Oncologist 7:324–328
Greco A, Hainsworth JD (1997) Paclitaxel (1-h infusion) plus carboplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter phase II trial. Semin Oncol 24:512–514, S12–S17
Bonomi P, Kim KM, Fairclough D et al (2000) Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial. J Clin Oncol 18:623–631
Kosmidis P, Milonakis N, Fountzilas G et al (1997) Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel (225 mg/m2) plus carboplatin in non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study. Semin Oncol 24:12–30, S12–S33
Akerley W, Glantz M, Choy H et al (1998) Phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel in advanced lung cancer. J Oncol 16:153–157
Frasci G, Panza N, Comella P et al (1999) Cisplatin-topotecan-paclitaxel weekly administration with G-CSF support for ovarian and small-cell lung cancer patients: a dose-finding study. Ann Oncol 10:355
Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staqnet M (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhower EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216
Giaccone G (2004) Twenty-five years of treating advanced NSCLC: what have we achieved? Ann Oncol 15:Siv83
Kouroussis Ch, Androulakis N, Kakolyris St et al (1998) First-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma with docetaxel and vinorelbine. Cancer 83:2083–2090
Miller VA, Krug LM, Ng KK et al (2000) Phase II trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:1346–1350
Frasci G, Lorousso V, Panza N et al (2000) Gemcitabine versus vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2529–2536
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stathopoulos, G., Katis, C., Tsavdaridis, D. et al. Front-line paclitaxel and topotecan chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 58, 555–560 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-006-0204-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-006-0204-y