Summary
Relapse of acute leukemia is a frequent complication with uncertain outcome and poorly defined risk factors. From 1621 patients entered into two prospective clinical trials (AML02; n = 740 and AML04; n = 881), 74.2% reached complete remission (CR) 1 after induction(s) and 59 patients after additional induction ± hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Of the non-refractory patients, 48.4% with a median age of 63 (range 17–85) years relapsed. Relapses occurred within 6 months after CR in 46.5%, between 7 and 18 months in 38.7%, and after 18 months in 14.8% of patients. Relapse treatment resulted in CR2 in 39% of patients depending upon age (54.5% of ≤ 60 and 28.6% of > 60 years), duration of CR1, and treatment of relapse. Overall survival (OS) was 10.9 (7.4–16.2) %, but OS after HCT ± intensive chemotherapy (ICT) was 39.3% (31.8–48.6) at 5 years and not different in younger and older patients. Donor lymphocyte infusion ± chemotherapy and ICT alone resulted only in OS of 15.4% and of 5%, respectively. Independent favorable factors for OS were long CR1 duration, and HCT, while non-monosomal disease was beneficial for OS in elderly patients. Leukemia-free survival [LFS; 24.9 (19.5–31.7) % at 10 years] was affected by similar risk factors. In a competing risk model, the relapse incidence at 5 years was 53.5 ± 3.5% and the non-relapse mortality rate 21.7 ± 2.9%. Lower relapse incidence was observed in patents with HCT, long CR1 duration, and female gender. Risk factors for non-relapse mortality were HCT in younger and type of AML in elderly patients. In conclusion, allogeneic HCT ± IC improved the results in relapsed AML in younger and elderly patients. Increasing CR2 rates and HCT frequency will be the challenge for the next years. Relapse of the disease remains the major problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Relapse is the main cause of treatment failure in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Induction chemotherapy with one or two cycles of cytarabine in combination with anthracyclines results in complete remission (CR) in 60–80% of younger and in 40–60% of older adults depending on genetic and molecular risk factors [1, 2]. Despite achievement of CR following one or two intensive inductions and 2–3 cycles of consolidations with or without hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), relapses occur frequently and remain the major obstacle to cure. Prognostic factors for response and survival in relapsed as opposed to newly diagnosed AML are not well defined and are largely restricted to younger patients. In order to identify risk factors in more detail, we analyzed two prospective OSHO studies involving newly diagnosed AML patients. The characteristics, outcome, and prognostic factors were assessed from a total of 1621 AML patients aged 17–87 years. Risk factors for outcome, which include molecular signatures at diagnosis, are particularly important in elderly patients because of their high relapse risk and poor OS [3,4,5,6,7,8]. The results are important for counseling patients on HCT timing in CR1 or CR2. In addition, the results obtained from this study are compared to those of related studies in recent decades and strategies for improvement are discussed.
Patients and methods
Patients
All patients of the prospective OSHO AML trials (AML02 for patients ≤ 60 years, NCT01414231, and AML04 for patients > 60 years of age, NCT01497002) were included. Patients had given informed consent prior to being included in the clinical trials, both of which were approved by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig.
AML02 included newly diagnosed, non-promyelocytic AML patients aged ≤ 60 years and was part of the German intergroup trial [9]. The upfront randomized (9:1 assignment) intergroup study compared the OSHO study arm to a common standard arm consisting of a 7 + 3 regimen [10]. A total of 30 (8.6%) patients were randomly assigned to the intergroup arm. Patients in the OSHO arm received idarubicin 12 mg/m2 qd on days 1–3 and cytarabine 2 g/m2 qd on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. After CR, allogeneic HCT was scheduled for patients with adverse or intermediate risk cytogenetics for whom a matched related or unrelated donor was available. AML04 included newly diagnosed, non-promyelocytic AML patients > 60 years of age similarly randomized (9:1 assignment) to receive cytarabine at 2 g/m2 qd on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 in combination with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 qd on days 1–3 (OSHO arm) or the 7 + 3 regimen (n = 43; 9.6%). Allogeneic related or unrelated HCT following non-myeloablative conditioning was considered after CR [11]. AML type (de novo AML, AML following MDS and t-AML) and cytogenetic risk were defined as previously described [12,13,14,15]. Treatment of relapse was performed using intensive chemotherapy where possible, hypomethylating agents (HMA), donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) in patients relapsing after HCT, or HCT.
Statistical analysis and definitions
CR, partial remission (PR), incomplete remission (CRi), and relapse were defined as published previously [1]. The main study endpoints were OS and LFS. Patients with CR2/CR2i or reinduction failure were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.
OS was calculated from date of diagnosis or relapse until death of any cause. LFS was measured from achievement of CR/CRi until relapse or death in CR. RFS was defined as time to any recurrence of AML, but death was censored. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was defined as death without prior relapse. For patients without an event, all survival endpoints were censored at the date of last follow-up. Relapse incidence (RI) and NRM were calculated using cumulative incidence in a competing risk setting.
Univariate analyses were done using log-rank test for OS, LFS, and RFS, while the Gray test was applied for RI and NRM [16]. Factors significant at p < 0.1 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate models. Multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model for response for CR2, the multivariable Cox regression model including allogeneic HCT in treatment of relapse as a time-dependent variable for OS and LFS, and the Fine and Gray regression method for RI and NRM [17]. To evaluate the effect of allogeneic HCT on RI and NRM, we used a landmark analysis taking into the account the median time interval of allogeneic HCT from CR2 (28 days). Patients without event (relapse or death) in the first 28 days after CR2 remained in the HCT comparison group. The degree of relatedness between linear-related variables was calculated by Pearson correlation. Factors in the multivariate model were sequentially removed in the order of least significance until the final model included only factors showing an effect with p < 0.05. All p values reported are two-sided and all statistical analyses were carried out with R (the R project for statistical computing 3.6.0; packages “survival” and “cmprsk”).
Results
Patient characteristics at diagnosis and outcome
A total of 1621 newly diagnosed AML patients were recruited. Their median age was 62 (17–87) years, 66.6% had de novo, 25.8% AML following MDS, and 7.6% therapy-related AML (Table 1). The cytogenetic risk was favorable in 7.6%, intermediate in 64.4%, and unfavorable in 27.6% of all patients. An FLT3-ITD mutation (mut) was present in 19.1% and NPM1 mut in 30.2% of patients (with lower frequencies in the elderly patients; p < 0.05). A high proportion of patients (n = 1144; 70.6) reached CR/CRi after one or two courses of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with 238 (14.7%) being considered refractory (56 in the younger and 182 in the elderly population; Table 2). Of these, 59 entered CR after additional ICT or HCT for a total of 1203 patients in CR/CRi (74.2%; Table 1). Only 37.3% of patients received HCT as consolidation in CR1, 46.6% of younger and 27.6% of elderly patients (Table 2). Another 72 of 238 refractory AML patients underwent HCT, corresponding to 69.6% of the younger (≤ 60 years) and 18.1% of the older (> 60 years) patients. OS reached 26.0 (23.4–28.9) % at 10 years with a clear difference between patients ≤ 60 years [41.5 (37.5–46.0) %] and those > 60 years [10.9 (7.0–16.8) %] at 10 years (Fig. 1A; p < 0.0001). OS was dependent upon remission status [CR after one or two induction(s)/CRi vs. PR vs. NR] and age (Fig. 1B). In multivariate analysis, advanced age, cytogenetic risk, and NPM1 wild type (wt) were independent risk factors for CR and in addition male gender (p < 0.05), abnormal WBC (< 2 / 2–75 / > 75; p < 0.001), and AML type (p < 0.01) for OS (data not shown). LFS at 10 years was age dependent and amounted to 41.3 (37.0–46.1) % in younger and 15.4 (12.1–19.6) % in elderly patients (Fig. 1C). FLT3-ITD was not a risk factor for survival in the whole population, but for RFS in younger patients (p = 0.02; suppl. Figure 1). RI was the predominant complication (53.1 ± 1.5% at 5 years; Fig. 1D) and was clearly higher in elderly (63.5 ± 2.1% at 5 years) than in younger (43.0 ± 2.2% at 5 years) patients. NRM was 14.3 ± 1.1% at 5 years and not age dependent.
Patient characteristics at relapse and outcome
Of 1148 patients achieving CR/CRi, 48.4% (n = 582) relapsed within 1–121 months (Table 1). Relapse rate was unevenly distributed between patients ≤ 60 and > 60 years with 40.1% and 62.2%, respectively (Table 1; p < 0.0001). Median age at relapse was 63 (range 17 to 85) years as compared to 62 (17–87) years at diagnosis with a slight predominance of male patients (51.2%). While there was a higher number of female patients in the younger population (54%), the elderly cohort contained more males (54.8%; p = 0.04). De novo, AML following MDS and therapy-related AML (t-AML) were present in 67.2%, 26.3%, and 6.6% patients, respectively. The frequencies of AML following MDS and of therapy-related AML were higher in elderly than in younger patients (32.2% vs. 17.5% and 9.3% vs. 2.6%, respectively; Table 1; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, 4.2% were of favorable risk, 66.2% of intermediate, and 29.6% of poor risk. Seventy-six patients (14.5%) had a monosomal karyotype at diagnosis (p = 0.007). FLT3-ITD was present in 21.9% and NPM1 mut in 30.5%. Overall, the time interval from CR to relapse was 6 months or less in 46.6%, 7 to 18 months in 38.7%, and 18 months or more in 14.8% patients.
Compared to younger patients, elderly patients had a higher incidence of unfavorable cytogenetics (32.0% vs. 26.2%, respectively; p = 0.007), monosomies (16.8% vs. 11.3%, respectively), and shorter CR1 duration (51.0% vs. 40.0% ≤ 6 months, respectively; p = 0.02; Table 1). There was a tendency towards a lower rate of FLT3-ITD in the elderly compared to the younger patients (19.2% vs. 26.3%, respectively; p = 0.09), while NPM1 mut rates were comparable (29.8 vs. 31.6, respectively; p = n.s.; Table 1).
Treatment of relapse consisted of ICT (n = 190), allogeneic HCT with or without prior ICT (n = 151), palliative low-dose chemotherapy (n = 65), HMA (n = 69), DLI or G-CSF-stimulated buffy coat infusion ± prior chemotherapy (n = 27), best supportive care (n = 21), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 9). A minority of patients (n = 39) received no treatment for relapse. Numbers of ICT without HCT and, as expected, palliative/supportive treatments were higher in elderly than in younger patients (Table 1). The detailed rate of HCT according to age was 46.0% in younger and 13.8% in elderly patients with relapse (84.3% in younger and 47.7% in elderly patients with CR2) and predominantly from unrelated donors (82.6% and 86.4%, respectively; Table 2). A high proportion of patients was transplanted from mismatched donors (42.3% ≤ 60 years vs. 13.1% > 60 years) and after reduced intensity/non-myeloablative rather than myeloablative conditioning (19.6% ≤ 60 vs. 40.9% > 60 years).
CR2 was attained in 227 (39%) of the 582 patients, with a higher CR rate in patients ≤ 60 (54.5%) than in patients > 60 years (28.6%; Table 1; p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, time interval CR–relapse and treatment were independent factors for CR2. Since all other factors correlated with age, younger and elderly patients were analyzed separately (suppl. Table 1). In younger patients, age and monosomal vs. non-monosomal karyotype were additional independent variables, while in elderly patients, only monosomal vs. non-monosomal karyotype and treatment were the only independent variables for achieving CR2.
OS for relapsed patients was 10.9 (7.4–16.2) % at 10 years (Fig. 2A) and age decade dependent (suppl. Figure 2). A clear difference was noted between patients ≤ 60 and those > 60 years with OS rates of 23.4 (18.2–29.9) % and 7.0 (4.4–11.0) % at 5 years, respectively (Fig. 2A; p < 0.0001). OS was associated with AML type (Fig. 2B), cytogenetic risk (Fig. 2C), and duration of CR1 (Fig. 2D). The median OS in patients with monosomal karyotype was particularly low (2.4 versus 8.4 months; suppl. Figure 3; p < 0.0001) and similar to the median survival of relapsed patients transplanted in CR1 (median 3.6%; suppl. Figure 4; p < 0.01). FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutational status alone or in any of the possible combinations at initial diagnosis had no impact on OS after relapse (suppl. Figure 5).
Patients with HCT ± ICT had an OS at 5 years of 39.3 (31.8–48.6) % (Fig. 3A) compared to 15.4 (6–39.9) % for those receiving DLI ± ICT/modified chemotherapy (suppl. Figure 6) and 5.0 (2.5–9.9) % for patients receiving ICT alone (p < 0.0001; Fig. 3A). The OS in patients with HCT ± ICT was durable up to 10 years and surprisingly not significantly different in younger as compared to elderly patients (Fig. 3A). The OS curves after palliative/supportive treatment did not show any age dependency (p = n.s.), while there was a difference in the 5-year OS (3% vs. 6%; p < 0.05) between younger and elderly patients with intensive chemotherapy.
Treatment with HCT and time interval CR1–relapse were age-independent variables for OS and in elderly patients, only monosomal vs. non-monosomal (Table 3). All other variables were interacting with age and not significant in the age-specific analysis. In the subgroup of patients with intensive chemotherapy, age, AML type, cytogenetics, and CR duration influenced survival (suppl. Figure 7), but cytogenetic risk, CR duration, and treatment with allogeneic HCT were the only independent risk factors, while all other characteristics interacted with age (suppl. Table 2). For palliative/supportive treatments, only cytogenetics and CR duration influenced OS (suppl. Figure 8), but only CR duration and non-monosomal vs. monosomal karyotype were independent risk factors (suppl. Table 2). The use of HMA agents in comparison to best supportive care was a beneficial factor in this treatment group, but not age or AML type. We finally were interested in analyzing the prognostic value of molecular marker in patients treated with intensive chemotherapy. As shown in suppl. Figure 9 (A–D), no significant differences in OS were observed between the different NPM1 and FLT3 combinations and the two age groups after intensive chemotherapy.
LFS amounted to 24.9 (19.5–31.7) % at 5 years for all patients and 33.7 (26.2–43.5) % for younger patients (p = 0.008; suppl. Figure 10). There was no overall difference in LFS between patients according to NPM1 and FLT-ITD molecular markers (suppl. Figure 11). Similar to OS, LFS was influenced by age, cytogenetic risk, time interval CR–relapse, and HCT treatment. All but the last two variables were closely associated with age in the multivariate analysis (Table 3). For LFS after relapse, cytogenetic risk was an age-independent factor in younger and time interval in elderly patients.
A second relapse was the major complication in CR2 patients with 53.5 ± 3.5% at 5 years (Fig. 3B). RI amounted to 45.9 ± 4.6% at 5 years for younger and 63.1 ± 5.2% at 5 years for elderly patients was higher in unfavorable than in favorable cytogenetics and was influenced by age, type of AML (in elderly), gender (in younger), and type of treatment (Table 3). NRM for relapsed patients was 21.7 ± 2.9% (Fig. 3B) and influenced by HCT in younger and type of AML in elderly patients.
Discussion
In contrast to untreated AML, for which cytogenetic and molecular prognostic factors are well established, prognostic factors for relapsed AML are less well defined. In the present study, we analyzed 582 patients with AML relapse out of 1621 patients covering the whole age spectrum of adult AML. Relapsed patients treated with allogeneic HCT had long-term OS of 39.3% at 5 years without significant differences between younger and older patients. DLI ± ICT and ICT alone had OS rates of ≤ 10% at 10 years. Clear differences were observed between younger and elderly patients in terms of disease characteristics (gender, AML type, cytogenetic risk, time interval from CR1 to relapse, and history of previous treatment), long-term outcome, and risk factors. Using multivariate analysis, we identified duration of first remission and allogeneic HCT as independent prognostic factors for OS. In contrast, mutational status of FLT3-ITD and NPM1 at initial presentation had no significant impact on the prognosis after relapse. The major complication was age-dependent RI of 53.5% at 5 years. NRM was age independent and resulted in 21.7% at 5 years.
Our study of a large number of patients covering the AML-typical age spectrum over a long observation period has several implications. First, it confirms the high RI of patients with newly diagnosed AML in CR1 of 53.1% rising to 63.5% at 5 years in patients > 60 years. Strategies to reduce RI are urgently needed. Maintenance approaches based on conventional chemotherapy, immunotherapy, HMA, and targeted small molecules have been explored. No data so far have been convincing enough to establish one approach as the standard of care, although recent trials in AML subgroups with targeted therapy are promising [18]. The more frequent use of the most potent antileukemic approach [19], allogeneic HCT, in high risk and intermediate risk AML patients in CR1 may be an option in the light of the continuous reduction in transplant-related mortality [20]. The use of HCT should be increased not only in the younger but also in the elderly population taking advantage of new low-toxicity technologies and the availability of donors for almost every patient [21, 22]. Indications for HCT have been described previously [20] and take into account the risk of HCT, the comorbidity of the patients, and the relapse incidence but should also consider the outcome of relapsed patients. Based on these considerations, at least 60% of patients with AML in CR1 may need an HCT. In our cohort, the HCT rate was 37.3% in all patients with CR1, 46.6% for patients ≤ 60 years, and 27.6% for > 60 years. A broader indication in younger patients with AML in CR1 and even more so in elderly patients may be aspired. In addition, MRD-guided therapy might improve the results. Finally, the identification of driver mutations and the availability of targeted small molecules for maintenance may help to reduce the relapse rate in CR1 [23].
Obtaining CR2 after relapse of AML is of fundamental importance for long-term outcome. Numerous salvage regimens have been used and some have been compared in prospective trials [3, 24,25,26,27]. CR rates are roughly 50% with many of the protocols, but CR duration is rather short and median OS only about 6 months. Even a liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin did not show a survival advantage in refractory AML except in a smaller subgroup [28]. It is not expected that chemotherapies or combination of chemotherapies will improve these results. Less toxic, targeted therapies to driver mutations might be more effective in inducing CR in selective AML subpopulations, as in the case of FLT3-ITD [29, 30] or IDH 1 or 2 inhibitors in patients carrying respective mutations [31]. Therapies with HMA with or without anti-apoptotic pathways inhibitors might be an option in patients with contraindication for intensive chemotherapy or even in relapsed AML first line [32,33,34].
Long-term OS data of our study highlight the key role of HCT in the treatment of relapsed AML not only in younger but also for the first time in elderly patients. Without HCT, OS amounts to only ≤ 10% at 10 years. Similar results were reported by the ECOG‐ACRIN Cancer Research Group describing a 5‐year OS of only 10% in younger patients [35]. Results from trials performed between 1983 and 1997 in patients ≤ 55 years report an OS of 9% in comparison to the 23.4% OS at 5 years in our analysis [7]. For elderly patients, OS at 5 years was reported to be 6% compared to the 7% seen in our study. Although HCT has been described as beneficial mainly in younger patients, our results suggest that allogeneic HCT in CR2 is the treatment with the highest long-term OS (37.9%) at 5 years and that elderly patients have results comparable to younger patients. Similar to our previously described concept of early HCT after achieving CR in high risk patients, performing HCT in CR as early and in as many patients as possible may further improve results in CR2 [36]. Results of DLI ± intensive/modified chemotherapy seem not to be an alternative to HCT.
Risk factors for CR and outcome in first relapse have been identified previously on smaller and younger populations [3]. Keating et al. demonstrated that age is an important predictor for response and survival [8] and Estey et al. that duration of first remission is an important predictor for survival [4]. Breems et al. confirmed four important prognostic indicators for survival: cytogenetics at initial diagnosis [t(16;16) or inv(16) being favorable], age at relapse, duration of first CR, and allogeneic HCT before relapse (unfavorable) [37]. In a smaller study with 81 relapsed and 57 refractory younger patients (median age 55 years), CR duration < 12 months, FLT3-ITD-positive status, and high-risk cytogenetics emerged as the three strongest independent adverse prognostic factors for OS and event-free survival [38]. In a study of the Spanish PETHEMA group, high-risk cytogenetics and t(8;21) at diagnosis, no previous allogeneic HCT and relapse-free interval < 12 months were associated with lower CR/CRi (median age 54 years). Of note, previous allogeneic HCT was a favorable prognostic factor in the PETHEMA study in contrast to other studies [39]. The largest study to date analyzed 1307 AML relapses out of 2170 patients in CR1 (60.2%) [40] according to curative (median age 53.6 years) and palliative treatment (median age 60.5 years). CR was observed in 38.4% of patients, with CR duration > 18 months, biallelic CEPBA mutation, and core binding factor-AML being favorable, while adverse cytogenetics and FLT3-ITD were negative prognostic factors for achieving CR or CRi. Interestingly, neither age, previous treatment with HCT, nor NPM1 mut were associated with response to salvage therapy. These results can only be compared to our younger patient population in which no impact of FLT3-ITD at diagnosis was found.
The current study has strengths and limitations. The prospective inclusion of all AML patients from diagnosis (with corresponding AML-typical age distribution and median age of 62 years) to relapse and all possible therapies of relapse are definitely strengths. Furthermore, a high proportion of patients over the age of 60 years was treated in a curative attempt at diagnosis (> 67%) and at relapse (53.8%). Limitations include lack of information on cytogenetic and molecular alterations at the time of relapse, in part also at initial diagnosis, lack of information on allelic ratios of FLT3 mutations, and missing ECOG and comorbidity indices impacting clinical outcome. However, entry of consecutive patients from diagnosis and the AML-typical age distribution may argue against biases. Furthermore, the use of non-myeloablative, less toxic conditioning regimen (Fludarabin/200 cGy total body irradiation, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil) and unrelated donors in elderly patients without outcome differences between 60–64, 65–69, and > 70 years may have played an important role [41].
Our study contributes to the knowledge and outcome on relapsed AML. While results in relapsing patients remain poor overall, results in subgroup of patients have shown clear improvement. Our data support previous studies showing increasing age, a shorter CR duration, and type of AML to be the strongest prognostic factors for CR2 and CR2 an important determinant for HCT. It is expected that with the use of targeted therapy and/or with use of HMA in combination with Bcl-2 inhibitors, CR rates will increase and may improve the results of HCT, if deeper CR rates are achieved. Currently, long-term results can only be obtained if CR2 is followed by HCT, which in our study was used in 84.4% of younger and in 47.4% of elderly patients in CR2. Explicitly, 53.8% (n = 163) of elderly patients received ICT, but only 44 patients received HCT. Increasing the rate of allogeneic HCT is no doubt the most interesting approach.
An accurate molecular analysis is required at the time of relapse to identify patients with driver mutations for whom targeted therapy is feasible and to facilitate subsequent MRD monitoring. Considering all the risk factors and heterogeneity of the disease, it is unrealistic to expect an improvement in OS across all AML patients. Stratification and the use of approaches tailored to individual subgroups will clearly be necessary. In this respect, identification of FLT3-ITD patients and targeted treatment with potent TKI inhibition like quizartinib and gilteritinib, monitoring MRD, and the use of HCT represent the most promising approach. Increasing CR2 rates, the use of HCT especially in elderly and reducing relapses will be the way to go.
Change history
16 September 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-021-04638-1
References
Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D et al (2017) Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood 129:424–447
Kahl C, Krahl R, Becker C et al (2016) Long-term follow-up of the AML97 study for patients aged 60 years and above with acute myeloid leukaemia: a study of the East German Haematology and Oncology Study Group (OSHO). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142:305–315
Ravandi F (2013) Relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: why is there no standard of care? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 26:253–259
Estey EH (2000) Treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myelogenous leukemia. Leukemia 14:476–479
Estey EH, Plunkett W, Kantarjian H, Rios MB, Keating MJ (1993) Treatment of relapsed or refractory AML with intermediate-dose arabinosylcytosine (ara-C): confirmation of the importance of ara-C triphosphate formation in mediating response to ara-C. Leuk Lymphoma 10(Suppl):115–121
Kantarjian H, O’Brien S, Cortes J et al (2008) Therapeutic advances in leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome over the past 40 years. Cancer 113:1933–1952
Rowe JM, Li X-S, Cassileth PA et al (2005) Very poor survival of patients with AML who relapse after achieving a first complete remission: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. Blood 106(11):546
Keating MJ, Kantarjian H, Smith TL et al (1989) Response to salvage therapy and survival after relapse in acute myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Oncol 7:1071–1080
Büchner T, Schlenk RF, Schaich M et al (2012) Acute myeloid leukemia (AML): different treatment strategies versus a common standard arm—combined prospective analysis by the German AML Intergroup. J Clin Oncol 30:3604–3610
Mayer RJ, Davis RB, Schiffer CA et al (1994) Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 331:896–903
Hegenbart U, Niederwieser D, Forman S et al (2003) Hematopoietic cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors after minimal conditioning as a curative treatment modality for severe paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Biol Bood Marrow Transplant 9:689–697
Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F et al (1998) The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children’s Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood 92:2322–33
Grimwade D, Walker H, Harrison G et al (2001) The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial. Blood 98:1312–1320
Byrd JC, Mrózek K, Dodge RK et al (2002) Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood 100:4325–4336
Döhner H, Estey EH, Amadori S et al (2010) Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 115:453–474
Gray RJ (1988) A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 16:1141–1154
Fine JP, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):496–509
Canaani J, Luger SM (2016) Revisiting maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia with novel agents. Curr Opin Hematol 23:175–180
Rodríguez-Arboli E, Labopin M, Tischer J et al (2020) FLAMSA-based reduced intensity conditioning versus myeloablative conditioning in younger patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia with active disease at the time of allogeneic stem cell transplantation: an ALWP/EBMT analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 26(11):2165–2173
Cornelissen JJ, Gratwohl A, Schlenk RF et al (2012) The European LeukemiaNet AML Working Party consensus statement on allogeneic HSCT for patients with AML in remission: an integrated-risk adapted approach. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9:579–590
Hegenbart U, Niederwieser D, Sandmaier BM et al (2006) Treatment for acute myelogenous leukemia by low dose total body irradiation (TBI) based conditioning and hematopoietic cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors. J Clin Oncol 24:444–453
Luznik L, O’Donnell PV, Fuchs EJ (2012) Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for tolerance induction in HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation. Semin Oncol 39:683–693
Burchert A, Bug G, Fritz LV et al (2020) Sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-internal tandem duplication mutation (SORMAIN). J Clin Oncol 38(26):2993–3002
Megías-Vericat JE, Martínez-Cuadrón D, Sanz MA, Montesinos P (2018) Salvage regimens using conventional chemotherapy agents for relapsed/refractory adult AML patients: a systematic literature review. Ann Hematol 97:1115–1153
Schlenk RF, Müller-Tidow C, Benner A, Kieser M (2017) Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: any progress? Curr Opin Oncol 29:467–473
Canaani J, Nagar M, Heering G et al (2020) Reassessing the role of high dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget 11:2233–2245
Thiel A, Schetelig J, Pönisch W et al (2015) Mito-FLAG with Ara-C as bolus versus continuous infusion in recurrent or refractory AML—long-term results of a prospective randomized intergroup study of the East German Study Group Hematology/Oncology (OSHO) and the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL). Ann Oncol 26:1434–1440
Cortes JE, Goldberg SL, Feldman EJ et al (2015) Phase II, multicenter, randomized trial of CPX-351 (cytarabine:daunorubicin) liposome injection versus intensive salvage therapy in adults with first relapse AML. Cancer 121:234–242
Cortes JE, Khaled S, Martinelli G et al (2019) Quizartinib versus salvage chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia (QuANTUM-R): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:984–997
Perl AE, Martinelli G, Cortes JE et al (2019) Gilteritinib or chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML. N Engl J Med 381:1728–1740
Stein EM, DiNardo CD, Fathi AT et al (2019) Molecular remission and response patterns in patients with mutant-IDH2 acute myeloid leukemia treated with enasidenib. Blood 133:676–687
Al-Ali HK, Jaekel N, Junghanss C et al (2012) Azacitidine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia medically unfit for or resistant to chemotherapy: a multicenter phase I/II study. Leuk Lymphoma 53:110–117
DiNardo CD, Pratz KW, Letai A et al (2018) Safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol 19:216–228
Thol F, Ganser A (2020) Treatment of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Curr Treat Options Oncol 21:66
Ganzel C, Sun Z, Cripe LD, Fernandez HF, Douer D, Rowe JM, Paietta EM, Ketterling R, O'Connell MJ, Wiernik PH, Bennett JM, Litzow MR, Luger SM, Lazarus HM, Tallman MS (2018) Very poor long-term survival in past and more recent studies for relapsed AML patients: The ECOG-ACRIN experience. Am J Hematol 93(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.25162
Basara N, Schulze A, Wedding U et al (2009) Early related or unrelated haematopoietic cell transplantation results in higher overall survival and leukaemia-free survival compared with conventional chemotherapy in high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia patients in first complete remission. Leukemia 23:635–640
Breems DA, van Putten WL, Huijgens PC et al (2005) Prognostic index for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. J Clin Oncol 23:1969–1978
Chevallier P, Labopin M, Turlure P et al (2011) A new Leukemia Prognostic Scoring System for refractory/relapsed adult acute myelogeneous leukaemia patients: a GOELAMS study. Leukemia 25:939–944
Bergua JM, Montesinos P, Martinez-Cuadrón D et al (2016) A prognostic model for survival after salvage treatment with FLAG-Ida +/- gemtuzumab-ozogamicine in adult patients with refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 174:700–710
Schlenk RF, Frech P, Weber D et al (2017) Impact of pretreatment characteristics and salvage strategy on outcome in patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 31:1217–1220
Sorror ML, Sandmaier BM, Storer BE et al (2011) Long-term outcomes among older patients following nonmyeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies. JAMA 306:1874–1883
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original version of this article was revised: The first name of authors were erroneously presented (correct Volker Schmidt instead of Schmidt Volker; correct Christian Späth instead of Späth Wolfgang). In figure 2B, the n value of de novo AML should be 389 instead of 369. In figure 2D, the n value of ≤6 months should be 271 instead of 86 and the n value of >18 months should be 86 instead of 271.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Heinicke, T., Krahl, R., Kahl, C. et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation improves long-term outcome for relapsed AML patients across all ages: results from two East German Study Group Hematology and Oncology (OSHO) trials. Ann Hematol 100, 2387–2398 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-021-04565-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-021-04565-1