Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring MRD with flow cytometry: an effective method to predict relapse for ALL patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring by four-color flow cytometry (FCM) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). MRD was examined with four-color FCM at different time points in 139 patients (including pediatric and adult patients) with ALL after allo-HSCT. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) was applied to evaluate the MRD of Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (Ph+ ALL) patients. Patients who were FCM-positive (FCM+) after transplantation had a lower event-free survival (EFS) of 0.54 and a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of 0.54 compared to an EFS of 0.80 and a CIR of 0.08 in FCM-negative (FCM−) patients (EFS, p < 0.001; CIR, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in high-risk patients and Ph+ ALL patients. Moreover, a FCM+ status after the second month post-HSCT (defined as MRD positive) proved to be a predictor of leukemia relapse. Multivariate analysis for EFS, OS and CIR showed that MRD status after transplantation was an independent prognostic factor (p < 0.001, p = 0.013, and p < 0.001, respectively). A good correlation was found between the MRD results of FCM and RQ-PCR (n = 126 pairs, Spearman r = 0.8139, p < 0.001). MRD monitoring by four-color FCM post-transplantation is an important tool for relapse prediction in ALL patients. Prompt and appropriate pre-emptive anti-leukemia treatment could be considered based on the status of MRD after HSCT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avivi I, Rowe JM, Goldstone AH (2002) Stem cell transplantation in adult ALL patients. Best Practice Res 15(4):653–674

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bader P, Hancock J, Kreyenberg H, Goulden NJ, Niethammer D, Oakhill A, Steward CG, Handgretinger R, Beck JF, Klingebiel T (2002) Minimal residual disease (MRD) status prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a powerful predictor for post-transplant outcome in children with ALL. Leukemia 16(9):1668–1672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borowitz MJ, Devidas M, Hunger SP, Bowman WP, Carroll AJ, Carroll WL, Linda S, Martin PL, Pullen DJ, Viswanatha D, Willman CL, Winick N, Camitta BM (2008) Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children’s Oncology Group study. Blood 111(12):5477–5485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Borowitz MJ, Pullen DJ, Shuster JJ, Viswanatha D, Montgomery K, Willman CL, Camitta B (2003) Minimal residual disease detection in childhood precursor-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: relation to other risk factors. A Children’s Oncology Group study. Leukemia 17(8):1566–1572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruggemann M, Raff T, Flohr T, Gokbuget N, Nakao M, Droese J, Luschen S, Pott C, Ritgen M, Scheuring U, Horst HA, Thiel E, Hoelzer D, Bartram CR, Kneba M (2006) Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 107(3):1116–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bunin N, Johnston DA, Roberts WM, Ouspenskaia MV, Papusha VZ, Brandt MA, Zipf TF (2003) Residual leukaemia after bone marrow transplant in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia after first haematological relapse or with poor initial presenting features. Br J Haematol 120(4):711–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campana D (2004) Minimal residual disease studies in acute leukemia. Am J Clin Pathol 122(Suppl):S47–S57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campana D, Coustan-Smith E (2004) Minimal residual disease studies by flow cytometry in acute leukemia. Acta Haematol 112(1–2):8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Campana D, Neale GA, Coustan-Smith E, Pui CH (2001) Detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the St Jude experience. Leukemia 15(2):278–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ciudad J, San Miguel JF, Lopez-Berges MC, Vidriales B, Valverde B, Ocqueteau M, Mateos G, Caballero MD, Hernandez J, Moro MJ, Mateos MV, Orfao A (1998) Prognostic value of immunophenotypic detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 16(12):3774–3781

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coustan-Smith E, Behm FG, Sanchez J, Boyett JM, Hancock ML, Raimondi SC, Rubnitz JE, Rivera GK, Sandlund JT, Pui CH, Campana D (1998) Immunological detection of minimal residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet 351(9102):550–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Coustan-Smith E, Sancho J, Behm FG, Hancock ML, Razzouk BI, Ribeiro RC, Rivera GK, Rubnitz JE, Sandlund JT, Pui CH, Campana D (2002) Prognostic importance of measuring early clearance of leukemic cells by flow cytometry in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 100(1):52–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Coustan-Smith E, Sancho J, Hancock ML, Boyett JM, Behm FG, Raimondi SC, Sandlund JT, Rivera GK, Rubnitz JE, Ribeiro RC, Pui CH, Campana D (2000) Clinical importance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 96(8):2691–2696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dworzak MN, Froschl G, Printz D, Mann G, Potschger U, Muhlegger N, Fritsch G, Gadner H (2002) Prognostic significance and modalities of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 99(6):1952–1958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dworzak MN, Panzer-Grumayer ER (2003) Flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 44(9):1445–1455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA, Lerner KG, Thomas ED (1974) Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 18(4):295–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang XJ, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Chen H, Han W, Chen YH, Zhang XH, Lu DP (2009) Treatment of acute leukemia with unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical blood and bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 15(2):257–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knechtli CJ, Goulden NJ, Hancock JP, Harris EL, Garland RJ, Jones CG, Grandage VL, Rowbottom AW, Green AF, Clarke E, Lankester AW, Potter MN, Cornish JM, Pamphilon DH, Steward CG, Oakhill A (1998) Minimal residual disease status as a predictor of relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 102(3):860–871

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Koh KN, Park M, Kim BE, Im HJ, Park CJ, Jang S, Chi HS, Seo JJ (2010) Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease detected by a simplified flow cytometric assay during remission induction chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Korean J Pediatr 53(11):957–964. doi:10.3345/kjp.2010.53.11.957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu YR, Zhang LP, Chang Y, Cheng YF, Fu JY, Li LD, Wang H, Liu GL, Chen SS, Huang XJ, Lu DP (2006) Clinical significance for minimal residual disease detection by 4 color flow cytometry in adult and childhood B lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Chin J Hematol 27(5):302–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Malec M, Bjorklund E, Soderhall S, Mazur J, Sjogren AM, Pisa P, Bjorkholm M, Porwit-MacDonald A (2001) Flow cytometry and allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR are equally effective in detection of minimal residual disease in ALL. Leukemia 15(5):716–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitterbauer G, Nemeth P, Wacha S, Cross NC, Schwarzinger I, Jaeger U, Geissler K, Greinix HT, Kalhs P, Lechner K, Mannhalter C (1999) Quantification of minimal residual disease in patients with BCR-ABL-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia using quantitative competitive polymerase chain reaction. Br J Haematol 106(3):634–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mortuza FY, Papaioannou M, Moreira IM, Coyle LA, Gameiro P, Gandini D, Prentice HG, Goldstone A, Hoffbrand AV, Foroni L (2002) Minimal residual disease tests provide an independent predictor of clinical outcome in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 20(4):1094–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Munoz L, Lopez O, Martino R, Brunet S, Bellido M, Rubiol E, Sierra J, Nomdedeu JF (2000) Combined use of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry to study minimal residual disease in Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 85(7):704–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagler A, Condiotti R, Rabinowitz R, Schlesinger M, Nguyen M, Terstappen LW (1999) Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) by multi-parameter flow cytometry (MPFC). Med Oncol (Northwood, London, England) 16(3):177–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Neale GA, Coustan-Smith E, Stow P, Pan Q, Chen X, Pui CH, Campana D (2004) Comparative analysis of flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 18(5):934–938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Preudhomme C, Henic N, Cazin B, Lai JL, Bertheas MF, Vanrumbeke M, Lemoine F, Jouet JP, Deconninck E, Nelken B, Cosson A, Fenaux P (1997) Good correlation between RT-PCR analysis and relapse in Philadelphia (Ph1)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Leukemia 11(2):294–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Qin YZ, Li JL, Zhu HH, Li LD, Chang Y, Le H, Ruan GR, Liu YR, Huang XJ, Chen SS (2007) Detection of common fusion transcript levels in untreated leukemia patients by real-time quantitative RT-PCR technique. Chin J Hematol 28(7):433–437

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Qin YZ, Liu YR, Zhu HH, Li JL, Ruan GR, Zhang Y, Jiang Q, Jiang H, Li LD, Chang Y, Huang XJ, Chen SS (2008) Different kinetic patterns of BCR-ABL transcript levels in imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia patients after achieving complete cytogenetic response. Int J Lab Hematol 30(4):317–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sanchez J, Serrano J, Gomez P, Martinez F, Martin C, Madero L, Herrera C, Garcia JM, Casano J, Torres A (2002) Clinical value of immunological monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia after allogeneic transplantation. Br J Haematol 116(3):686–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spinelli O, Peruta B, Tosi M, Guerini V, Salvi A, Zanotti MC, Oldani E, Grassi A, Intermesoli T, Mico C, Rossi G, Fabris P, Lambertenghi-Deliliers G, Angelucci E, Barbui T, Bassan R, Rambaldi A (2007) Clearance of minimal residual disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and the prediction of the clinical outcome of adult patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 92(5):612–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Szczepanski T (2007) Why and how to quantify minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia? Leukemia 21(4):622–626

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. van der Velden VH, Wijkhuijs JM, van Dongen JJ (2008) Non-specific amplification of patient-specific Ig/TCR gene rearrangements depends on the time point during therapy: implications for minimal residual disease monitoring. Leukemia 22(3):641–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vidriales MB, Perez JJ, Lopez-Berges MC, Gutierrez N, Ciudad J, Lucio P, Vazquez L, Garcia-Sanz R, del Canizo MC, Fernandez-Calvo J, Ramos F, Rodriguez MJ, Calmuntia MJ, Porwith A, Orfao A, San-Miguel JF (2003) Minimal residual disease in adolescent (older than 14 years) and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemias: early immunophenotypic evaluation has high clinical value. Blood 101(12):4695–4700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Weir EG, Cowan K, LeBeau P, Borowitz MJ (1999) A limited antibody panel can distinguish B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia from normal B precursors with four color flow cytometry: implications for residual disease detection. Leukemia 13(4):558–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Outstanding Young Scientist’s Foundation of China (grant No. 30725038), Program for Innovative Research Team in University (grant No. IRT0702) and Leading Program of Clinical Faculty accredited by the Ministry of Health of China. The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Jun Huang.

Additional information

Xiao-Su Zhao and Yan-Rong Liu contributed equally to the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, XS., Liu, YR., Zhu, HH. et al. Monitoring MRD with flow cytometry: an effective method to predict relapse for ALL patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ann Hematol 91, 183–192 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-011-1285-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-011-1285-1

Keywords

Navigation