Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Coracobrachialis muscle: morphology, morphometry and gender differences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Coracobrachialis (CBM) is a complex muscle with a wide range of variations in its morphology and innervation. The goal of this study was to elucidate the morphology, morphometry, gender differences of CBM and precise anatomical position of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) with reference to surrounding anatomical landmarks in an adult Sri Lankan population.

Method

Cadaveric upper limbs (n = 312) were examined for the proximal and distal attachments, length, width, thickness of CBM and its relationship with the MCN.

Results

The CBM originated from the tip of the coracoid process of the scapula and lateral, posterior and medial aspects of the tendon of short head of biceps brachii. Gender differences were observed in all morphometrical parameters of CBM. In 83.33 %, MCN perforated the CBM. In 50 % the MCN pierced the middle one-third of CBM while none pierced the lower one-third. The distance from the coracoid process to the point of entry of MCN into CBM (distance P) was 50.62 mm. A positive correlation was observed between the arm length and distance P indicating that arm length provides an accurate and reliable means of gauging the distance P of an individual.

Conclusion

The present study provides new evidence pertaining to the origin of CBM. Further, it was revealed that the predicted distance P of any upper extremity can be calculated by dividing the arm length by 5. Precise anatomical location of MCN in relation to CBM using unequivocal and well-defined anatomical landmarks will be imperative in modern surgical procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bach BR, O’Brien SJ, Warren RF, Leighton M (1988) An unusual neurological complication of the Bristow procedure: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:458–460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bassett RW, Browne AO, Morrey BF (1990) Glenohumeral muscle force and moment mechanics in a position of shoulder instability. J Biomech 23:405–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassmajian J (1989) Grants method of anatomy, 11th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltiomore

  4. Böhnel P (1979) Variant of the coracobrachialis muscle. Handchirurgie 11:119–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clavert P, Lutz JC, Wolfram-Gabel R et al (2009) Relationship of musculocutaneous nerve and the coracobrachialis during coracoids abutment procedure (Latarjet procedure). Surg Radiol Anat 31:49–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eglseder WA, Goldman M (1997) Anatomic variations of the musculocutaneous nerve in the arm. Am J Orthop 26:777–780

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Naggar MM (2001) A study on the morphology of the coracobrachialis muscle and its relationship with the musculocutaneous nerve. Folia Morphol 60:217–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Flatow EL, Bigliani LU, April EW (1989) An anatomic study of the musculocutaneous nerve and its relationship to the coracoid process. Clin Orthop 244:166–171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guha R, Satyanarayana N, Reddy CK, Jayasri N, Nitin V, Praveen G et al (2010) Variant insertion of coracobrachialis muscle-morphological significance, embryological basis and clinical importance. J Coll Med Sci-Nepal 6:42–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gümüşalan Y, Yazar F, Ozan H (1998) Variant innervation of the cora-cobrachialis muscle and unusual course of the musculocutaneous nerve in man. Kaibogaku Zasshi 73:269–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanson P, Peter MS, Sorensen H, Erik BS (1999) Anatomical differences in the psoas muscles in young black and white men. J Anat 194:303–307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hobar PC, Rohrich RJ, Mickel TJ (1990) The coracobrachialis muscle flap for coverage of exposed axillary vessels: a salvage procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:801–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klepps SJ, Goldfarb C, Flatow E, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K (2001) Anatomic evaluation of the subcoracoid pectoralis major transfer in human cadavers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:453–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koizumi M (1989) A morphological study on the coracobrachialis muscle. Kaibogaku Zasshi 64:18–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kopuz C, Icten N, Yildirim M (2003) A rare accessory coracobrachialis muscle: a review of the literature. Surg Radiol Anat 24:406–410

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liem K, Bemis W, Walker WF, Grande L (2000) Function anatomy of the vertebrates: an evolutionary perspective. 3rd edn. Brooks/Cole, Boston

  17. Loukas M, Aqueelah H (2005) Musculocutaneous and median nerve connections within, proximal and distal to the coracobrachialis muscle. Folia Morphol 64:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J (1984) Muscle strength and cross-sectional area in man: a comparison of strength-trained and untrained subjects. Br J Sports Med 18:149–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakatani T, Mizukami S, Tanaka S (1997) Three cases of the musculocutaneous nerve not perforating the coracobrachialis muscle. Kaibogaku Zasshi 72:191–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozturk A, Bayraktar B, Taskara N, Kale AC, Kutlu C, Cecen A (2005) Morphometric study of the nerves entering into the coracobrachialis muscle. Surg Radiol Anat 27:308–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Parry SW, Ward JW, Mathes SJ (1988) Vascular anatomy of the upper extremity muscles. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:358–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ray B, Rai AL, Roy TS (2004) Unusual insertion of the coracobrachialis muscle to the brachial fascia associated with high division of brachial artery. Clin Anat 17:672–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rebouças F, Filho RB, Filardis C, Pereira RR, Cardoso AA (2010) Anatomical study of the musculocutaneous nerve in relation to the coracoid process. Rev Bras Orthop 45:400–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Remerand F, Laulan J, Couvret C et al (2010) Is the musculocutaneous nerve really in the coracobrachialis muscle when performing an axillary block? An ultrasound study. Anesth Analg 110:1729–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Romanes GJ (1986) Cunningham’s textbook of anatomy, 15th Edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  26. Sinnathamby CS (1999) Last’s anatomy regional and applied, 10th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  27. Struthers J (1854) On some points in the abnormal anatomy of the arm. Br Foreign Med Chir Rev 14:170–179

    Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor GI, Cichowitz A, Ang SG, Seneviratne S, Ashton M (2003) Comparative anatomical study of the gracilis and coracobrachialis muscles: implications for facial reanimation. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:20–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Venieratos D, Anagnostopoulou S (1998) Classification of communications between the musculocutaneous and median nerves. Clin Anat 11:327–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE (2000) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, P.O. Box 70, Galle, Sri Lanka

    Isurani Ilayperuma, B. G. Nanayakkara, S. M. Uluwitiya & K. N. Palahepitiya

  2. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka

    R. Hasan

Authors
  1. Isurani Ilayperuma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. G. Nanayakkara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Hasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. M. Uluwitiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. N. Palahepitiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isurani Ilayperuma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ilayperuma, I., Nanayakkara, B.G., Hasan, R. et al. Coracobrachialis muscle: morphology, morphometry and gender differences. Surg Radiol Anat 38, 335–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1564-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1564-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation