Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomical variations of lumbosacral plexus

  • Anatomic Variations
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Basis

Deviations detected during spinal operations have motivated us to start research related to variations of lumbosacral plexus formation. Aim of this work was to find out deviations of its formation from ascension of particular roots from foramen invertebrale and foramina sacralia up to formation of terminal branches.

Set

One hundred lumbosacral plexi have been examined in 50 adult cadavers for a purpose to find out an incidence of neural variations. We have observed participation of Th12 root, L4 and L5 roots in its formation, as well as various deviations from ascension of particular plexiform roots up to their ending branches. For lumbal plexus, we have observed four nerve roots and six lumbal nerves; for sacral one, three sacral roots with a share of S4 and lumbosacral trunk formed of L4 and L5 roots and four sacral nerves. We have considered also their course, anastomoses and thickness. We highlight motoric innervation particularities in relation to diagnostics besides anatomical complexity and variability.

Results

Variations on the level of neural roots were common, nerve formations were uncommon. Thickness of neural roots, formation or their absence were dependent on the type of plexus, particularly in sacral area. For lumbal plexus, L1 root was the thinnest and L4 root was the thickest. L3 root was the thickest in six cases. Fifth lumbal root usually completely filled foramen invertebrale. We have observed double ascension of L4 root from foramen invertebrale in 25 cases and plexiform in five cases. In other cases it was branched in various distance following ascension from foramen invertebrale. Plexiform ascension of L3 root along with L4 root was present in two cases. Double ascension of L3 root was present in four cases. L2, L3 along with L5 roots were doubled in two cases. Iliohypogastric nerve was the longest, ilioinguinal was the thinnest and nervus femoralis was the thickest. Changes in sacral plexus on the level of neural roots have been observed 41-times. Double ascension of L5 root was present in eight cases and plexiform in four cases. Double S1 root at ascension from foramina sacralia was present 16 times, S2 8 times, S3 once and S1 along with S2 4 times. S1, S2 and S3 roots were branched in various distance following ascension from foramina sacralia in 15 cases. Truncus lumbosacralis was thickened in 19 cases, a share from L4 root was thicker as L5 root in 11 cases. Low level of connection between truncus lumbosacralis and S1 root was observed in 10 cases. Nervus ischiadicus has branched into tibial and peroneal portions already in minor pelvis in two cases. The level of distance of n. (nervus) gluteus superior, n. gluteus inferior, n. cutaneus femoris posterior and n. pudendus was dependent on the plexus type.

Conclusion

This study enabled us to find out and to describe extraordinary anatomical deviations in formation of neural roots and nerves of lumbal and sacral plexus, undescribed yet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Fergusson MWJ (1995) Gray’s anatomy, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 1258–1274

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams PL, Warwick R (1985) Gray’s anatomy, 36th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 1106–1110

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chin Ch, Chew KC (1997) Lumbosacral nerve root avulsion. Injury 28:674–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Erbil K, Onderoglu S, Basar R (1998) Unusual branching in lumbar plexus. Case report. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 57:377–381

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hope EE, Bodensteiner JB, Thong N (1985) Neonatal lumbar plexus injury. Arch Neurol 42:94–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iczi Y, Gürkanlar D, Ozan H, Gönül E (2005) The morphological aspects of lumbar plexus and roots. An anatomical study. Turk Neurosurg 15:87–92

    Google Scholar 

  7. Urbanowitz Z (1981) Connections between the lumbal and sacral plexus in man. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 40:271–279

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weber RH (1961) Some variations in the lumbal plexus of nerves in man. Acta Anat 44:336–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergman RA, Thompson SA, Afifi AK, Saddeh FA (1988) Compendium of human anatomical variations. Urban and Schwarzenburg, Baltimore, pp 138–139

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haigh PI (1999) Soft-tissue images. Abdominal aortic aneurism causing lumbar plexus neuropraxis. Can J Surg 42:329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marieb EN, Mallat J (2005) Základy embryologie, kapitola 3. In: Marieb EN, Mallat J (eds) Anatomie lidského těla. Computer Press, a.s., Brno, pp 62–67

  12. O’Rahilly R, Muller F, Meyer DB (1990) The human vertebral column at the end of the embryonic periods proper. 4. The sacrococcygeal region. J Anat 168:95–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Matejčík.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matejčík, V. Anatomical variations of lumbosacral plexus. Surg Radiol Anat 32, 409–414 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0546-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0546-3

Keywords

Navigation