Skip to main content
Log in

A cost analysis for using recycled irrigation runoff water in container nursery production: a Southern California nursery case study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the U.S., container plant growers use high-quality water sources which can be expensive. The use of recycled irrigation runoff water could save growers money. The objective of this study was to compare the cost of recycled irrigation water with the cost of untreated municipal water at a nursery in Southern California over multiple years. Water cost for municipal (Western) supplied water ranged from $2.26 to $2.91 per 1000 gallons (3785 L). Water capturing and recycling system construction and infrastructure costs accounted for a large portion of recycled water cost. However, water provider rebates and a Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) grant reduced total and per volume recycled water costs. Without considering rebates from water providers and a NRCS grant, the cost of recycled water was between $0.92 and $1.21 per 1000 gallons (3785 L). With consideration of rebates and the grant, the cost of recycled water ranged between $0.43 and $0.53 per 1000 gallons (3785 L). Thus, recycled water is a viable alternative to many high cost water sources and public funds facilitate adoption of recycled water for irrigation by containerized plant growers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome 300 (9):p D05109

    Google Scholar 

  • Behe BK, Campbell BL, Hall CR, Khachatryan H, Dennis JH, Yue CY (2013) Consumer preferences for local and sustainable plant production characteristics. Hortscience 48(2):200–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Board CSWRC. (2015) Irrigated lands regulatory program. http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/agriculture/docs/about_agwaivers.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2017

  • Burger DW, Hartin JS, Hodel DR, Lukaszewski TA, Tjosvold SA, Wagner SA (1987) Water use in California’s ornamental nurseries. Calif Agric 41(9–10):7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • CDFA (2016) State water efficiency and enhancement program. https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/oefi/sweep/. Accessed 27 Mar 2017

  • DeVincentis AJ, Brumfield RG, Gottlieb P, Johnson JR (2015) Cost analysis of using recycled water in container production: a case study of Southern New Jersey. Hortscience 50(8):1196–1201

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans RY (2014) Nutrition and Fertilization. In: Newman JP (ed) Container nursery production and business management manual. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources Communication Services, Richmond, CA, pp 69–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher A, LeBude AV, Owen JS, White SA, Beeson RC (2016) The next ten years: strategic vision of water resources for nursery producers. Horttechnology 26(2):121–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall CR, Campbell BL, Behe BK, Yue CY, Lopez RG, Dennis JH (2010) The appeal of biodegradable packaging to floral consumers. Hortscience 45(4):583–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones DW (2012) Reference evapotranspiration zones. State of California

  • Lamm AJ, Warner LA, Martin E, White SA, Fisher PR (2017) Enhancing extension programs by discussing water conservation technology adoption with growers. J Agric Educ 58(1):251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman JP, Kabashima JN, Merhaut D, Haver DL, Gan J, Oki LR (2014) Controlling runoff and recycling water, nutrients, and waste. In: Newman JP (ed) Container nursery production and business management manual. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources Communication Services, Richmond, pp 95–118

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2017) National Climatic Data Center. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/normals. Accessed 13 Apr 2017

  • NRCS U (2014) Environmental quality incentives program. Accessed 4 Apr 2017

  • Raudales RE, Fisher PR, Hall CR (2017) The cost of irrigation sources and water treatment in greenhouse production. Irrig Sci 35(1):43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaible G, Aillery M (2012) Water conservation in irrigated agriculture: trends and challenges in the face of emerging demands

  • Schuch UK, Burger DW (1997) Water use and crop coefficients of woody ornamentals in containers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 122(5):727–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Skimina CA, Kabashima JN (1994) Water recycling in container crop production. In: Heuser CW, Heuser PE (eds) Recycling and resource conservation practices. Pennsylvania Nurserymen’s Association, Harrisburg, pp 13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2014a) Census of horticultural specialties. vol 3. Washington D.C.

  • USDA (2014b) Farm and ranch irrigation survey. vol 3. Washington D.C.

  • Zetland D (2011) Colorado river aqueduct. In: Danver SL, Burch JR (eds) Encyclopedia of water politics and policy in the United States. CQ Press/SAGE, Washington D.C., pp 420–421

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2014-51181-22372. We would like to thank Altman Plants including Ken Altman, Jim Hessler, Jerry Miller, and Javier Lopez for contributing information for this study. Western Municipal Water District staff, Mallory Gandara and Gregory Bucy, provided water meter reading and cost information. Richard Evans was instrumental in providing a thorough review of this manuscript prior to submission. We appreciate Grant Johnson’s assistance in obtaining recycled water data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno J. L. Pitton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Fereres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pitton, B.J.L., Hall, C.R., Haver, D.L. et al. A cost analysis for using recycled irrigation runoff water in container nursery production: a Southern California nursery case study. Irrig Sci 36, 217–226 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-018-0578-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-018-0578-8

Navigation